math.OCNov 27, 2025

On the Condition Number Dependency in Bilevel Optimization

Authors: Lesi ChenJingzhao Zhang

Organizations: IIIS, Tsinghua University

Abstract

Bilevel optimization minimizes an objective function, defined by an upper-level problem whose feasible region is the solution of a lower-level problem. We study the oracle complexity of finding an εε-stationary point with first-order methods when the upper-level problem is nonconvex, and the lower-level problem is strongly convex. Recent works (Ji et al., ICML 2021; Arbel and Mairal, ICLR 2022; Chen et al., JMLR 2025) achieve a O~(κˉy4ε2)\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\bar κ_y^4 ε^{-2}) upper bound that is near-optimal in εε, which can be reduced to O~(κˉy7/2ε2)\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\bar κ_y^{7/2} ε^{-2}) by a naive application of Nesterov acceleration in the inner loop, where κˉy\bar κ_y is the global condition number. However, the optimal dependency on the condition number is unknown. In this work, we establish a new Ω(κy5/2ε2)Ω(κ_y^{5/2} ε^{-2}) lower bound, where κy<κˉyκ_y < \bar κ_y is the lower-level condition number that is of the same order as κˉy\bar κ_y when the smoothness constants are O(1)\mathcal{O}(1). Our lower bound establishes the first provable gap in terms of condition number dependency between bilevel problems and minimax problems in this setup. Our lower bounds can be extended to various settings, including high-order smooth functions, stochastic oracles, and convex hyper-objectives: (1) For second-order and arbitrarily smooth problems, we show lower bounds of Ω(κy31/14ε12/7)Ω({κ_y^{31/14}} ε^{-12/7}) and Ω(κy21/10ε8/5)Ω(κ_y^{21/10} ε^{-8/5}), respectively. (2) For convex-strongly-convex problems, we improve the previously best lower bound (Ji and Liang, JMLR 2022) from Ω(κy/ε)Ω(κ_y /\sqrtε) to Ω(κy3/2/ε)Ω(κ_y^{3/2} / \sqrtε). (3) For smooth stochastic problems, we also show a lower bound of Ω(κy4ε4)Ω(κ_y^4 ε^{-4}).

Explore similar work

CardsList