Dual-Evolving Reinforcement Learning for Automated Reward Design

Designing effective reward functions is a critical challenge in Reinforcement Learning (RL), which traditionally requires costly manual trial-and-error. While Large Language Model (LLM)-based methods have shown promise in reward design, undifferentiated sampling and limited use of historical feedback often lead to insufficient exploration of the reward space and optimization instability. To address these challenges, we propose $R^2E$, a Role-driven Reward Evolutionary framework for automated reward function design that structures the process through explicit role specialization. $R^2E$ employs multiple LLM roles with complementary objectives: an Explorer that promotes novelty to expand the search space, a Guardian that performs conservative refinements to improve training stability, and an Evolver that recombines high-performing rewards via crossover and mutation to integrate effective structures. A dynamic scheduling strategy coordinates these roles, progressively shifting the search from broad exploration to focused exploitation. To mitigate optimization instability and provide a medium for cross-role collaboration, $R^2E$ incorporates a Global Elite Pool that retains the best-performing rewards to guide subsequent generations, thereby enabling coordinated interaction among roles and ensuring a reliable and consistent refinement process. Extensive experiments on multiple robotic tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.

Designing effective reward functions is a cornerstone of reinforcement learning (RL), yet it remains a challenging and labor-intensive process due to the inefficiencies and inconsistencies inherent in traditional methods. Existing methods often rely on extensive manual design and evaluation steps, which are prone to redundancy and overlook local uncertainties at intermediate decision points. To address these challenges, we propose the Chain of Uncertain Rewards (CoUR), a novel framework that integrates large language models (LLMs) to streamline reward function design and evaluation in RL environments. Specifically, our CoUR introduces code uncertainty quantification with a similarity selection mechanism that combines textual and semantic analyses to identify and reuse the most relevant reward function components. By reducing redundant evaluations and leveraging Bayesian optimization on decoupled reward terms, CoUR enables a more efficient and robust search for optimal reward feedback. We comprehensively evaluate CoUR across nine original environments from IsaacGym and all 20 tasks from the Bidexterous Manipulation benchmark. The experimental results demonstrate that CoUR not only achieves better performance but also significantly lowers the cost of reward evaluations.

The temporal structure of reward composition in reinforcement learning (RL) is typically hand-designed and held fixed throughout training, leaving the progression of motivational priorities largely unexplored. In this work, we propose an evolutionary framework for discovering developmental reward schedules, in which three distinct biologically inspired motivational components -- agency, novelty, and reactivity -- are combined through time-varying weights that dynamically shift over the course of training. Evaluated on two sparse-reward MiniGrid tasks: DoorKey-6x6 and KeyCorridorS3R1, our framework compares the generalizability of four evolutionary algorithms: CMA-ES, xNES, DE, and L-SHADE against an extrinsically motivated baseline (our main comparison point), and three additional hand-designed methods. On DoorKey-6x6, all evolved methods outperform the non-evolved baselines, with L-SHADE achieving the best performance -- an approximate relative mean improvement of 11.4% over the extrinsic only baseline. On KeyCorridorS3R1, CMA-ES achieves the best overall performance, with the remaining evolved methods showing weaker and less reliable generalization capability compared to the extrinsic only baseline. Interestingly, the discovered schedules diverge from our defined developmental ordering, with novelty consistently emerging as the dominant early signal during training, across both tasks. Collectively, our results position evolutionary optimization as a promising approach for developmental reward schedule discovery in deep reinforcement learning, and suggest that what evolution finds to be optimal in computational settings may differ from what it finds to be optimal in biology. The code for this project can be found at: https://github.com/alannadels/Evolutionary_RL.git.