Music Cover Retrieval, also known as Version Identification, aims to recognize distinct renditions of the same underlying musical work, a task central to catalog management, copyright enforcement, and music retrieval. State-of-the-art approaches have largely focused on harmonic and melodic features, employing increasingly complex audio pipelines designed to be invariant to musical attributes that often vary widely across covers. While effective, these methods demand substantial training time and computational resources. By contrast, lyrics constitute a strong invariant across covers, though their use has been limited by the difficulty of extracting them accurately and efficiently from polyphonic audio. Early methods relied on simple frameworks that limited downstream performance, while more recent systems deliver stronger results but require large models integrated within complex multimodal architectures. We introduce LIVI (Lyrics-Informed Version Identification), an approach that seeks to balance retrieval accuracy with computational efficiency. First, LIVI leverages supervision from state-of-the-art transcription and text embedding models during training to achieve retrieval accuracy on par with--or superior to--harmonic-based systems. Second, LIVI remains lightweight and efficient by removing the transcription step at inference, challenging the dominance of complexity-heavy pipelines.
Music retrieval is relation-dependent: given a reference track, a listener may seek its style with a new theme, a cover, or a comparable voice, and these intents demand contradictory rankings. We present MUUNRiver-Bench, a diagnostic benchmark whose reference-audio queries use natural-language instructions to define relevance. A pipeline combining expert genre priors, LLM-generated prompts and lyrics, synthesis, and expert review yields 3,440 tracks spanning 13 genres and 116 sub-genres, and seven tasks: similar-music, style-preserving lyric-rewriting, lyric-preserving style-rewriting, cover, vocal-timbre, isolated-vocal, and segment retrieval. Across six models in eight configurations, task-wise rank reversals reveal complementary biases: acoustic encoders favour local identity, whereas text-aligned encoders favour semantic relations. Frozen encoders diagnose default similarity preferences; instruction-aware and audio-text fusion systems provide exploratory tests of textual conditioning, with neither simple fusion scheme consistently improving its backbone
There have been several studies on automatically generating piano covers, and recent advancements in deep learning have enabled the creation of more sophisticated covers. However, existing automatic piano cover models still have room for improvement in terms of expressiveness and fidelity to the original. To address these issues, we propose a learning algorithm called AMT-APC, which leverages the capabilities of automatic music transcription models. By utilizing the strengths of well-established automatic music transcription models, we aim to improve the accuracy of piano cover generation. Our experiments demonstrate that the AMT-APC model reproduces original tracks more accurately than any existing models.
AI-generated covers often fail through local musical errors that a global quality score cannot locate: the vocal contour may remain recognizable while the accompaniment uses the wrong harmonic function, or the output may stay in key while the arrangement remains incomplete. We present a five-dimensional diagnostic framework covering melodic pitch, harmonic progression, key consistency, style consistency, and arrangement/production quality. The benchmark contains 30 covers generated from 5 source songs by 6 systems, with expert severity ratings and 9 symbolic or acoustic features. Harmonic progression and arrangement had the highest severe-error rates (53% and 47%), whereas key consistency was better preserved. Six covers combined acceptable key consistency with severe harmonic errors. Large-leap ratio had a nominal association with melodic ratings (Spearman rho = -0.429, uncorrected p = 0.018), but no feature correlation survived the nine-test multiplicity reference. An interpretable percentile-rule pilot likewise failed to outperform a fixed majority baseline reliably across 16 dimension-level comparisons. The results separate useful diagnostic evidence from dependable automatic scoring: low-level and symbolic summaries can expose particular symptoms, but they do not replace context-aware musical judgment.