An Evolutionary Framework for Automatic Optimization Benchmark Generation via Large Language Models

Designing effective multi-objective Bayesian optimization (MOBO) algorithms requires balancing many interdependent design choices whose optimal configuration is problem-dependent and typically demands deep expertise. We extend the LLaMEA framework to MOBO, using large language models as mutation and crossover operators within evolutionary strategies to generate complete algorithm implementations, with SMAC hyperparameter optimization integrated into the evolutionary loop. Across nine evolutionary runs we generated approximately 900 algorithms and benchmarked them on twelve synthetic problems (ZDT, DTLZ, WFG) and three real-world engineering problems (RE), using a BoFire qParEGO implementation as a state-of-the-art Bayesian-optimization baseline. On the synthetic suite the strongest generated algorithm attains the highest mean normalized hypervolume (0.971, vs. 0.869 for qParEGO) while requiring roughly 60x less wall-clock time; a Friedman test with post-hoc analysis places the two in a single top-performing group, and per-problem tests find the generated algorithm significantly better than qParEGO on 7 of the 12 problems and never worse, matching state-of-the-art accuracy at an order-of-magnitude lower cost. On the three unseen real-world engineering problems a generated algorithm attains the best mean normalized hypervolume (0.985, vs. 0.971 for qParEGO)--significantly better than qParEGO on two of the three problems--at roughly 3.4x lower wall-clock cost, confirming that the gains transfer beyond the synthetic regime. LLM-driven evolutionary search can thus discover algorithm designs that achieve Pareto-efficient trade-offs difficult to reach through manual design.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated with evolutionary computation to support optimization tasks. This survey primarily focuses on evolutionary optimization, i.e., optimization based on evolutionary computation. For brevity, we use the term optimization throughout to denote this scope. However, existing surveys typically examine isolated roles of LLMs and do not provide a unified view that connects optimization modeling with optimization solving. To address this gap, we systematically review recent developments through a workflow-oriented framework. First, we organize the literature into two primary stages: LLMs for optimization modeling and LLMs for optimization solving (in this survey, the terms optimization modeling and optimization solving are used as concise forms of optimization problem modeling and optimization problem solving, respectively). Second, we divide the solving stage into three paradigms according to the role of the LLM: stand-alone optimizers, low-level components embedded in optimization algorithms, and high-level managers for algorithm selection and generation. Third, we analyze representative methods, identify their technical limitations, and clarify their relationships with traditional optimization approaches. We further substantiate this taxonomy through benchmark systematization, baseline comparisons, and practitioner-oriented guidance, and we review interdisciplinary applications across the natural sciences, engineering, and machine learning. Based on the resulting analysis, we identify research directions toward dynamic, self-evolving, and agentic optimization ecosystems. An up-to-date collection of related literature is maintained at https://github.com/ishmael233/LLM4OPT.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for optimization modeling and solver-code generation, yet practical operations research and optimization problems often require a harder capability: designing scalable algorithms that exploit problem structure and outperform direct formulation-and-solve baselines. Existing benchmarks are limited to small or simplified examples far below real-world scale and complexity. We introduce FrontierOR, among the first benchmarks to systematically evaluate LLM-based efficient algorithm design for realistic large-scale optimization problems. FrontierOR includes 180 tasks derived from methodologically diverse papers published in top-tier operations research venues, each with standardized instances and a hidden, expert-verified evaluation suite. We evaluate seven LLMs spanning frontier, cost-effective, and open-source models both in one-shot and test-time evolution settings. The results reveal that frontier models still struggle to move from executable formulations to efficient optimization algorithms: the strongest one-shot model outperforms Gurobi in only 31% of cases in both solution quality and computational efficiency, and even strong coding agents with test-time evolution achieve only 50% on selected hard tasks. FrontierOR establishes a practical evaluation platform for LLM-based optimization algorithm design, which enables future LLMs and agents to be systematically tested on whether they can move beyond correct formulation toward a feasible, high-quality, and efficient algorithm. Code and data are publicly released at https://github.com/Minw913/FrontierOR.