Variational Approach for Job Shop Scheduling

Efficiently solving the Job Shop Scheduling Problem in real-world industrial applications requires policies that are both computationally lean and topologically robust. While Reinforcement Learning has shown potential in automating dispatching rules, existing models often struggle with a scalability bottleneck caused by quadratic graph complexity or the architectural overhead of heterogeneous layers. We introduce a unified graph framework that employs feature-based homogenization to project distinct node roles into a shared latent space. This allows a standard homogeneous Graph Isomorphism Network to capture complex resource contention with linear complexity, ensuring low-latency inference for large-scale industrial applications. Our empirical results demonstrate that our framework achieves state-of-the-art performance while exhibiting consistent zero-shot generalization. We identify the job-to-machine ratio as the primary driver of policy effectiveness, rather than absolute problem size. Based on this, we propose a hypothesis of structural saturation, demonstrating that policies trained on critically congested instances ($\mathcal{J} \approx \mathcal{M}$) learn scale-invariant resolution strategies. Agents trained at this saturation point internalize invariant conflict-resolution logic, allowing them to treat massive rectangular instances as a sequential concatenation of saturated sub-problems. This approach eliminates the need for expensive scale-specific retraining and prevents overfitting to statistical shortcuts, providing a robust and efficient pathway for deploying RL solutions in dynamic production environments.

The Flexible Job Shop Scheduling Problem (FJSP) is the optimal allocation of a set of jobs to machines. Two primary challenges persist in FJSP: the unpredictable arrival of future jobs and the combinatorial complexity of the problem, rendering it intractable for conventional mixed-integer linear programming solvers. This paper proposes an event-based \gls{DRL} approach to solve FJSP with random job arrivals. Specifically, we employ the Proximal Policy Optimization algorithm and use lightweight Multi-Layer Perceptrons to train the \gls{DRL} agent for minimizing the total completion time of all jobs. We design the state representation to be directly accessible from the environment, and limit the learning agent to selecting from among a set of well-established dispatching rules. Simulations show that our \gls{DRL} approach outperforms any of the individual dispatching rules on datasets with varying heterogeneity and job arrival rates. We benchmark our \gls{DRL} against an arrival-triggered mixed-integer linear programming solution and show that our method achieves good performance especially when the datasets are heterogeneous.

The job shop scheduling problem is a challenging combinatorial optimization problem, and recent reinforcement learning approaches using graph neural networks have shown promise for learning scheduling policies directly from problem instances. However, training on large instances remains computationally expensive, and generalization across instance sizes remains challenging. This paper studies curriculum learning for graph neural network-based reinforcement learning in the job shop scheduling problem by comparing it with single-size training across three target sizes: 20 x 20, 25 x 25, and 30 x 30. In the curriculum setting, the policy is first trained on smaller instances and then progressively adapted to larger target sizes, allowing scheduling behavior learned in earlier stages to support learning on larger instances. Models are evaluated on unseen instances from 8 x 8 to 30 x 30 using the optimality gap, considering both generalization across all evaluation sizes and specialization on the target size. Results show that curriculum learning consistently reduces wall-clock training time, with larger benefits as the target size increases. The strongest advantage is observed at 30 x 30, where curriculum learning reduces the mean optimality gap across all evaluation sizes by approximately 8.1 percentage points, reduces the target-size mean optimality gap by approximately 8.6 percentage points, and saves approximately 50 hours of training time.