math.STFeb 16, 2026

Frequentist Regret Analysis of Gaussian Process Thompson Sampling via Fractional Posteriors

Authors: Somjit Roy, Prateek Jaiswal, Anirban Bhattacharya, Debdeep Pati, Bani K. Mallick

Organizations: Department of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA · Daniels School of Business, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA · Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA

Abstract

We study Gaussian Process Thompson Sampling (GP-TS) for sequential decision-making over compact, continuous action spaces and provide a frequentist regret analysis based on fractional Gaussian process posteriors, without relying on domain discretization as in prior work. We show that the variance inflation commonly assumed in existing analyses of GP-TS can be interpreted as Thompson Sampling with respect to a fractional posterior with tempering parameter α∈(0,1)α\in (0,1). We derive a kernel-agnostic regret bound expressed in terms of the information gain parameter γtγ_t and the posterior contraction rate εtε_t, and identify conditions on the Gaussian process prior under which εtε_t can be controlled. As special cases of our general bound, we recover regret of order O~(T12)\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(T^{\frac{1}{2}}) for the squared exponential kernel, O~(T2ν+3d2(2ν+d))\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(T^{\frac{2ν+3d}{2(2ν+d)}} ) for the Matérn-νν kernel, and a bound of order O~(T2ν+3d2(2ν+d))\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(T^{\frac{2ν+3d}{2(2ν+d)}}) for the rational quadratic kernel. Overall, our analysis provides a unified and discretization-free regret framework for GP-TS that applies broadly across kernel classes.

Explore similar work

Mar 10, 2026

On Regret Bounds of Thompson Sampling for Bayesian Optimization

We study a widely used Bayesian optimization method, Gaussian process Thompson sampling (GP-TS), under the assumption that the objective function is a sample path from a GP. Compared with the GP upper confidence bound (GP-UCB) with established high-probability and expected regret bounds, most analyses of GP-TS have been limited to expected regret. Moreover, whether the recent analyses of GP-UCB for the lenient regret and the improved cumulative regret upper bound can be applied to GP-TS remains unclear. To fill these gaps, this paper shows several regret bounds: (i) a regret lower bound for GP-TS, which implies that GP-TS suffers from a polynomial dependence on 1/δ1/δ with probability δδ, (ii) an upper bound of the second moment of cumulative regret, which directly suggests an improved regret upper bound on δδ, (iii) expected lenient regret upper bounds, and (iv) an improved cumulative regret upper bound on the time horizon TT. Along the way, we provide several useful lemmas, including a relaxation of the necessary condition from recent analysis to obtain improved regret upper bounds on TT.
Sep 12, 2023

Generalized Regret Analysis of Thompson Sampling using Fractional Posteriors

Thompson sampling (TS) is one of the most popular and earliest algorithms to solve stochastic multi-armed bandit problems. We consider a variant of TS, named αα-TS, where we use a fractional or αα-posterior (α∈(0,1)α\in(0,1)) instead of the standard posterior distribution. To compute an αα-posterior, the likelihood in the definition of the standard posterior is tempered with a factor αα. For αα-TS we obtain both instance-dependent O(∑k≠i∗Δk(log⁡(T)C(α)Δk2+12))\mathcal{O}\left(\sum_{k \neq i^*} Δ_k\left(\frac{\log(T)}{C(α)Δ_k^2} + \frac{1}{2} \right)\right) and instance-independent O(KTlog⁡K)\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{KT\log K}) frequentist regret bounds under very mild conditions on the prior and reward distributions, where ΔkΔ_k is the gap between the true mean rewards of the kthk^{th} and the best arms, and C(α)C(α) is a known constant. Both the sub-Gaussian and exponential family models satisfy our general conditions on the reward distribution. Our conditions on the prior distribution can be easily satisfied by a density that is positive, continuous, and bounded. We also establish another instance-dependent regret upper bound that matches (up to constants) to that of improved UCB [Auer and Ortner, 2010]. Our regret analysis carefully adapts and combines recent theoretical developments in the non-asymptotic concentration analysis and Bernstein-von Mises type results for the αα-posterior distribution. Moreover, our analysis does not require additional structural properties such as closed-form posteriors or conjugate priors.
Oct 14, 2026

Convergence Rates of Gaussian Process Thompson Sampling for Efficient Global Optimization

Efficient global optimization aims to identify a global optimum of an expensive black-box function within a limited evaluation budget NN. We investigate the convergence rates of Gaussian process Thompson sampling (GP-TS) under noiseless observations, assuming a fixed objective function in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS). For Matérn kernels with smoothness parameter νν in dimension dd, we establish a worst-case expected simple-regret upper bound of O(N−ν/dlog⁡N)O(N^{-ν/d}\sqrt{\log N}) for both discrete GP-TS on sufficiently fine grids and its continuous counterpart. For the continuous implementation, we develop a nested-grid argument to control posterior sample paths over the entire domain. We further establish matching lower bounds of Ω(N−5/2log⁡N)Ω(N^{-5/2}\sqrt{\log N}) for both implementations under a fixed one-dimensional Matérn-5/25/2 kernel, demonstrating that the logarithmic penalty is intrinsic to standard GP-TS in this setting. Motivated by this limitation, we propose Gaussian Process Capped Thompson Sampling (GP-CTS), which caps posterior sample paths using a valid RKHS norm upper bound while preserving optimism. This modification successfully eliminates the logarithmic penalty and achieves the minimax-optimal rate Θ(N−ν/d)Θ(N^{-ν/d}) for both discrete and continuous implementations.