Generalized Regret Analysis of Thompson Sampling using Fractional Posteriors
Organizations: Department of Quantitative Methods, Daniels School of Business, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47906, USA. · Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA. · Department of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Abstract
Thompson sampling (TS) is one of the most popular and earliest algorithms to solve stochastic multi-armed bandit problems. We consider a variant of TS, named -TS, where we use a fractional or -posterior () instead of the standard posterior distribution. To compute an -posterior, the likelihood in the definition of the standard posterior is tempered with a factor . For -TS we obtain both instance-dependent and instance-independent frequentist regret bounds under very mild conditions on the prior and reward distributions, where is the gap between the true mean rewards of the and the best arms, and is a known constant. Both the sub-Gaussian and exponential family models satisfy our general conditions on the reward distribution. Our conditions on the prior distribution can be easily satisfied by a density that is positive, continuous, and bounded. We also establish another instance-dependent regret upper bound that matches (up to constants) to that of improved UCB [Auer and Ortner, 2010]. Our regret analysis carefully adapts and combines recent theoretical developments in the non-asymptotic concentration analysis and Bernstein-von Mises type results for the -posterior distribution. Moreover, our analysis does not require additional structural properties such as closed-form posteriors or conjugate priors.
Explore similar work
Asymptotic Optimality of Thompson Sampling for Risk-Averse Bandits with Sub-Gaussian Rewards
Prior Diffusiveness and Regret in the Linear-Gaussian Bandit
burn-in'' term $d r \sqrt{\mathrm{Tr}(Σ_0)}$ decouples additively from the minimax (long run) regret $σd \sqrt{T}$. Previous regret bounds exhibit a multiplicative dependence on these terms. We establish these results via a new elliptical potential'' lemma, and also provide a lower bound indicating that the burn-in term is unavoidable.