CREMD: Crowd-Sourced Emotional Multimodal Dogs Dataset
Organizations: dept. of Computer Science, New York Institute of Technology, New York, USA
Abstract
Dog emotion recognition plays a crucial role in enhancing human-animal interactions, veterinary care, and the development of automated systems for monitoring canine well-being. However, accurately interpreting dog emotions is challenging due to the subjective nature of emotional assessments and the absence of standardized ground truth methods. We present the CREMD (Crowd-sourced Emotional Multimodal Dogs Dataset), a comprehensive dataset exploring how different presentation modes (e.g., context, audio, video) and annotator characteristics (e.g., dog ownership, gender, professional experience) influence the perception and labeling of dog emotions. The dataset consists of 923 video clips presented in three distinct modes: without context or audio, with context but no audio, and with both context and audio. We analyze annotations from diverse participants, including dog owners, professionals, and individuals with varying demographic backgrounds and experience levels, to identify factors that influence reliable dog emotion recognition. Our findings reveal several key insights: (1) while adding visual context significantly improved annotation agreement, our findings regarding audio cues are inconclusive due to design limitations (specifically, the absence of a no-context-with-audio condition and limited clean audio availability); (2) contrary to expectations, non-owners and male annotators showed higher agreement levels than dog owners and female annotators, respectively, while professionals showed higher agreement levels, aligned with our initial hypothesis; and (3) the presence of audio substantially increased annotators' confidence in identifying specific emotions, particularly anger and fear.
Figures & tables
| Fear | Happy | Angry | Neutral |
| scared | playful | Agressive | calm |
| rescue | toy | fight | relaxed |
| abandoned | friendly | food agression | rest |
| shelter | excited | resource guarding | stting quietly |
| anxious | play | cesar milan | neutral state |
| anxiety | ball | growl | no emotion |
| Appearances | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Total |
| Count | 313 | 31 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 351 |
| Percentage | 89% | 9% | 1% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 100% |
| Index | Dog Id | Dog Name | Dog Breed | Dog Age | Dog Color | Dog Gender | Dog Size | Videos |
| 1 | D1003 | Tori | - | - | golden/white | - | medium | V1003 |
| 2 | D1056 | Dory | - | - | tan/light brown | female | big | V1058, V1070, V1071 |
| 3 | D1205 | Cong | miniature poodle | - | light brown | male | small | V1237, V1238 |
| 4 | D1146 | Meira | pit bull terrier | - | grey/white | female | medium | V1161, V1380, V1381 |
| Category | Statistic |
| Size | 23 |
| Female : Male | 13:10 |
| Owners | 16 (70%) |
| Professionals | 8 (35%) |
| Median Age | 32 |
| Race (n) | Asian (13), Caucasian (6), Hispanic (3), Other (1) |
| Category | Count |
| Annotations | 12,794 |
| Votes | 15,195 |
| Votes per Annotation | Count | % |
| 3 | 70 | 1% |
| 2 | 2,261 | 18% |
| 1 | 10,463 | 82% |
| Total | 12,794 | 100% |
| Comparison | p-value |
| NCNA vs. YCNA | 0.008 |
| YCNA vs. YCYA | 0.173 |
| NCNA vs. YCYA | 0.003 |
| Description | Value Range |
| Agreement scores | 0.0 to 1.0 |
| 0.0 | No agreement above chance |
| 1.0 | Perfect agreement |
| Category | NCNA | YCNA | YCYA | Overall |
| Not consistent | 3% | 2% | 0% | 5% |
| Partly consistent | 13% | 11% | 3% | 27% |
| Consistent | 29% | 30% | 9% | 68% |
| Statistic | Male | Female | Owner | Non-owner | Professional | Non-professional |
| median | 0.79 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.70 |
| mean | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.71 |
| 1QR | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.57 |
| 3QR | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.83 |
| max (excl. outliers) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| min (excl. outliers) | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| Test Type | Group | Value |
| Shapiro Test (Owners) | p-value | 1.72 × 10 -13 |
| Shapiro Test (Non-owners) | p-value | 1.28 × 10 -25 |
| Mann-Whitney U Test | p-value | 1.18 × 10 -21 |
| Test Type | Group | Value |
| Shapiro Test (Male) | p-value | 1.95 × 10 -21 |
| Shapiro Test (Female) | p-value | 4.14 × 10 -15 |
| Mann-Whitney U Test | p-value | 6.21 × 10 -15 |
| Test Type | Group | Value |
| Shapiro Test (Professionals) | p-value | 2.70 × 10 -22 |
| Shapiro Test (Non-professionals) | p-value | 2.50 × 10 -14 |
| Mann-Whitney U Test | p-value | 5.48 × 10 -8 |