Vision-language model (VLM) shows promise for high-level planning in smart manufacturing, yet their deployment in dynamic workcells faces two critical challenges: (1) stateless operation, they cannot persistently track out-of-view states, causing world-state drift; and (2) opaque reasoning, failures are difficult to diagnose, leading to costly blind retries. This paper presents VLM-DEWM, a cognitive architecture that decouples VLM reasoning from world-state management through a persistent, queryable Dynamic External World Model (DEWM). Each VLM decision is structured into an Externalizable Reasoning Trace (ERT), comprising action proposal, world belief, and causal assumption, which is validated against DEWM before execution. When failures occur, discrepancy analysis between predicted and observed states enables targeted recovery instead of global replanning. We evaluate VLM-DEWM on multi-station assembly, large-scale facility exploration, and real-robot recovery under induced failures. Compared to baseline memory-augmented VLM systems, VLM DEWM improves state-tracking accuracy from 56% to 93%, increases recovery success rate from below 5% to 95%, and significantly reduces computational overhead through structured memory. These results establish VLM-DEWM as a verifiable and resilient solution for long-horizon robotic operations in dynamic manufacturing environments.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Architectural Overview of the VLM-DEWM Framework. Operating on a Database-Transaction paradigm, the system is orchestrated through three tightly coupled modules. The perception module first projects raw multimodal sensory streams into a structured instantaneous snapshot ( Envt ) via geometric projection and filtration. This snapshot drives the thinking module, where the VLM serves as the reasoning core to simultaneously update the external world model (DEWM)—the central knowledge hub comprising environmental ( Ω ) and internal ( M,CS ) memory—and synthesize a structured External Reasoning Trace (ERT) . Crucially, the validation module treats the persistent memory in the DEWM as ground-truth evidence to rigorously verify the ERT’s logical and physical consistency before dispatching the final action sequence to the Robot Skill Library A for execution.
Figure 2: Structural Composition of the Environment Memory Core ( Ω ). The Spatial Network ( S ) maintains geometric state (left), while the Hierarchical Semantic Graph ( G ) encodes logical relations (right). The Grounding Link ( Φground , red) anchors every semantic node to its physical instantiation.
Action π
Pre-Condition ( G )
Atomic Effects ( Ωt+1,CSt+1 )
Rollback Trigger
Pick(obj)
∃Clear(obj)
1. Sobj : Detach PCobj 2. G : Del On(obj, *) 3. CS : Set Holding(obj)
Gripper width > limit (Slip)
Place(loc)
CS=Holding(obj)
1. Sobj : Anchor at loc 2. G : Add On(obj, loc) 3. CS : Set Idle
Force feedback > limit (Collision)
Insert(A, B)
∃Aligned(A, B)
1. G : Add Inserted(A, B) 2. CS : Set Idle
Torque > limit / Stall
Table 1: Atomic State Transition Rules for Primitive Skills
Figure 3: The Perception-to-Memory Synchronization Pipeline. Raw observations ( Ot ) are transformed into persistent belief updates via three stages: (1) task-focused perception producing Envt , (2) geometric-semantic data association, and (3) dual-layer updates (continuous S-Update and discrete G-Update with geometric verification).
Figure 4: The Progressive VLM-Guided Planning and Deep Recovery Loop (Sec. 3.3). Dynamic Context Engineering distills the DEWM state ( Ω,M,CS ) into a task-relevant prompt. The VLM then generates an External Reasoning Trace (ERT) which is mathematically validated before execution. On failure, the Deep Causal Diagnosis module computes the belief-outcome discrepancy ( Δ=Ωt+1⊖Acausal ) to generate targeted feedback for belief correction and informed recovery.
Figure 5: Task 1 Environment Setup. The multi-zone factory simulation scene containing blocks, spheres, and cylinders distributed across three distinct platforms. This raw visual input triggers the memory construction process.
Figure 6: Initial Memory Construction in Task 1. (a-b) The Geometric Layer of DEWM separates the static background (Left) from dynamic objects (Right). (c) The Semantic Layer initializes the topological graph and its matrix representation, anchoring the scene’s logical structure before manipulation.
Figure 7: Reasoning and Dynamic Update Process. (a) Based on the initial memory, the VLM decomposes the instruction “Complete Red Assembly” into a hierarchical execution tree. (b) After execution, the DEWM reflects the new physical reality. By comparing this with Fig. 6(c) , we observe the real-time topology update (e.g., edge On(cube, table) is replaced by On(cube, cylinder) ), verifying the system’s dynamic tracking capability.
Method
VLM Core
TSR (%) ↑
STA (%) ↑
PE ↓
IE (%) ↑
VLM-DEWM (Ours)
Gemini 2.5 Pro
94.00
100.00
75
100.00
SAGE [ 18 ]
Gemini 2.5 Pro
72.00
83.33
261
12.26
GEAR [ 21 ]
Gemini 2.5 Pro
0.00
–
148
–
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro
28.00
39.74
1
–
GPT-5
GPT-5
12.00
34.62
1
–
Qwen3-VL
Qwen3-VL
0.00
30.77
1
–
Table 2: Quantitative Results for Task 1 (Long-Horizon Assembly)
Figure 8: Task 2 Environment Setup. Multi-modal inputs (LIDAR + Camera) + semantic segmentation acquired during the town-scale exploration. This raw sensory stream serves as the input for constructing the DEWM.
Difficulty
Count
Description
Easy
15
Basic Recognition (e.g., “Is there a bank?”)
Medium
20
Spatial Relations (e.g., “Is the bench near the park?”)
Figure 9: Hierarchical Memory Construction in Task 2. (a) The reconstructed global semantic map serves as the metric substrate. (b) Key landmarks (e.g., hydrants) are extracted as object-centric instances. (c) The Semantic Graph abstracts these entities into topological relations (e.g., Near(bench, park) ), enabling efficient spatial querying.
Figure 10: Exploration Execution History ( M ). The temporal tree visualizes the robot’s 240-step exploration path. Color-coded nodes indicate memory events: Green nodes mark steps where new entities were discovered and registered into G ; Yellow nodes indicate steps with only re-observations, demonstrating the system’s efficiency in avoiding redundant updates.
Method
VLM Core
QSR (%) ↑
STA (%) ↑
PE ↓
IE (%) ↑
VLM-DEWM (Ours)
Gemini 2.5 Pro
94.00
92.68
509
90.14
SAGE
Gemini 2.5 Pro
52.00
56.10
2162
1.30
GEAR
Gemini 2.5 Pro
74.00
-
240
-
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro
-
29.27
240
-
Table 4: Quantitative Results for Task 2 (Exploration & Q&A)
Figure 11: Real-World Deployment. The Franka Emika Panda performing the dynamic assembly task. The system successfully diagnoses and recovers from induced execution failures using the CS -based causal diagnosis.
Long-horizon robotic tasks are vulnerable to unexpected environmental changes that can render planned actions ineffective or unsafe. To address this, robots must detect such changes as they occur, interpret their impact, and adjust their actions accordingly. Traditional rule-based decision-making pipelines are brittle in open-world conditions, as they are hand-tuned for specific scenarios and lack generalization. Vision-Language Models (VLMs) offer a promising alternative as they combine broad world knowledge with unified visual--text reasoning, enabling them to generalize across diverse scenarios and generate accurate, grounded task plans. However, for effective deployment in dynamic real-world settings, VLMs must be embedded into frameworks capable of handling uncertainty and environmental changes. Existing frameworks broadly address this reactively, triggering replanning only after execution failures or post-task checks, risking failed actions. Some methods verify conditions before actions, but these discrete checks miss changes occurring during execution. To address this, we present ProAct-VLM, an adaptive, physically grounded task planning framework that integrates VLMs within a real-time perception--feedback loop. ProAct-VLM continuously monitors the environment and re-plans as soon as relevant changes are detected, enabling adaptation before failure occurs. Evaluations against multiple baselines and across different VLM backbones show that our framework improves both success rates and efficiency in dynamic, long-horizon manipulation tasks. Project page: https://github.com/moured/ProAct-VLM
Ahmed Nader Ahmed, Omar Moured, Mughni Irfan Mohammed Abdul +2
Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. · Sereact GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany.
World models are becoming central to robotic planning and control by predicting future state transitions. Existing approaches mainly rely on visual, latent, or language prediction, which can be difficult to ground in executable robot actions and prone to compounding errors over long horizons. In contrast, traditional robotic task and motion planning enables structured long-horizon reasoning through compact symbolic representations of world transitions, but typically lacks synchronized visual prediction. We propose Hierarchical World Model (H-WM), which jointly predicts logical and visual state transitions by combining a high-level logical world model with a low-level visual world model. The predicted logical actions and latent visual state transitions are jointly incorporated into Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models as intermediate state guidance for long-horizon task execution. Experiments on three long-horizon benchmarks and real robots show that H-WM consistently improves VLA's performance by stabilizing long-horizon execution and mitigating error accumulation. We also construct LIBERO-Logic, a frame-level aligned dataset that pairs visual observations and continuous robot states with logical actions and predicate-based logical states.
Jinbang Huang, Wenyuan Chen, Zhiyuan Li +9
Huawei Noah’s Ark Lab · University of Toronto · University of British Columbia +1
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have achieved strong performance in visual perception and spatial reasoning, leading to growing interest in using them as high-level planners for embodied AI. However, physical tasks require models to integrate spatial information, reason over temporal states, and generate multi-step plans under various constraints, raising the question of whether current VLMs can reliably support such reasoning and planning independently of execution. We introduce Plan-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating the high-level reasoning and multi-step planning capabilities of VLMs relevant to embodied worlds, while isolating the influence of action execution. It covers three complementary dimensions, spanning 16 subclasses and 699 curated samples. Extensive evaluation of 28 VLMs reveals room for improvement, with even the strongest model achieving only 75.0% accuracy. We further find that model scaling generally improves these capabilities. Ablation studies also indicate larger models show increasing potential as high-level planners. Overall, Plan-Bench provides a lightweight probe for evaluating VLMs' reasoning and planning capabilities relevant to embodied environments and assessing their potential as decision makers for physical tasks. Our benchmark and code are available at https://github.com/MinneFeng/Plan-Bench.
Juntong Feng, Qingan Liu, Jingru Dong +8
Dalian University of Technology · Nanyang Technological University