AI-Generated Measurements for Identification and Inference with Missing Data: A Weak Shadow Variable Approach

An increasing number of scholars use AI to measure variables they subsequently include in downstream analyses. Although AI-measured variables are often analyzed as if observed without error, ignoring prediction errors in automated measurement leads to substantial bias and invalid confidence intervals in downstream analyses, even if AI measurement accuracy is high, e.g., above 90%. Existing solutions, such as design-based supervised learning and prediction-powered inference, combine error-prone AI-based measurements with gold-standard labels, which may be costly and difficult to obtain in some application areas. In this paper, we propose debiased inference with multiple imperfect measurements (DMM), a framework that combines multiple error-prone AI measurements to enable valid downstream inference without gold-standard labels. Building on the established results on CP decomposition, DMM assumes that these measurements are independent conditional on the latent true label and observed unit-level features, such as text features represented by embeddings. This framework allows for unknown misclassification rates to vary across annotation methods (e.g., large language models) and across units of annotation (e.g., texts). Under this assumption, we use semiparametric inference theory to prove that the DMM estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal, enabling valid inference for a wide range of downstream statistical analyses common in the social sciences. Our simulation results show that DMM yields valid inference and that adding accurate, though imperfect, measurements can improve efficiency. Focusing on common applications of large language model annotations, we also develop diagnostics to assess the conditional independence assumption.

We study linear regression when the regressor is latent and observed only through multiple noisy measurements, each a smooth but possibly nonlinear function of the latent variable. The problem is acute in the measurement of occupational exposure to artificial intelligence, where competing scores yield downstream estimates that differ by a factor of eleven. A regression on any single measurement recovers a source-specific coefficient rather than the structural one. We fix the latent scale by requiring the consensus measurement function to be linear and bound the remaining curvature heterogeneity across sources relative to slope. Under this bound, the structural coefficient lies in a closed-form interval centered at a symmetric cross-source estimator. The interval is invariant to unknown source loadings, and its half-width is second order in the curvature bound and sharp to the same order. With at least four measurements, the bound is estimable from the joint distribution of the sources through a split-instrument auxiliary regression, and Imbens-Manski confidence intervals with the Stoye critical value attain uniform coverage over the curvature class, including at the point-identified boundary. The application matches six exposure measures to an American Community Survey panel of 8.88 million person-year observations for 2015 to 2024. The post-2022 employment coefficient changes sign between the language-model measures and the Webb patent-text measure, and an ex ante factor-analytic rule separates the Webb measure as a distinct construct. The five retained sources yield a loading-invariant consensus coefficient of -0.239, with a partial-identification half-width of 1.23 percent of the point estimate, or 1.88 percent at the one-sided 95 percent upper bound on the curvature. We read the application as measurement reconciliation rather than as a causal estimate of AI displacement.

Large language models have been widely evaluated as simulators of individual survey responses. In practice, however, fully unobserved responses are rare; the dominant problem is partial non-response. Imputation aims to restore the overall structure of a survey dataset by filling in these missing values. It has its own well-defined evaluation criteria and differs fundamentally from prediction. We propose to impute missing survey data through in-context learning (ICL). We systematically evaluate ICL design choices across different missingness mechanisms (MCAR, MAR, MNAR) on 150 opinion variables spanning 15 waves of the American Trends Panel. Compared to well-established statistical methods for data imputation like MICE PMM, our ICL approach consistently reduces absolute error across all missingness mechanisms, with the largest gains under non-random missingness (MNAR). Notably, the best-performing specification (gpt-oss-120b with 100 in-context examples) achieves near-nominal aggregate coverage (approaching the 95% level) with confidence intervals two to five times narrower than MICE PMM. We publish a Python package with an sklearn-like API to enable easy deployment of our method using local and proprietary LLMs.