Activation Steering via Generative Causal Mediation

Activation steering controls language model behavior by adding directions to internal representations at inference time, but standard residual-stream steering can fail in stateful dialogue. We identify KV-cache contamination as a key failure mode: steered token states are stored and repeatedly reused, turning a local perturbation into cumulative coherence degradation. To address this challenge, we propose Gated Cropped Attention-Delta steering (GCAD), which extracts steering signals from system-prompt contributions to self-attention and applies them with token-level gating. Across persona-steering experiments, GCAD preserves trait control while substantially improving long-horizon coherence. On the main multi-turn benchmark, GCAD improves average coherence drift from -18.6 to -1.9 and raises turn-10 trait expression from 78.0 to 93.1. These results suggest that activation steering becomes more reliable when interventions follow the prompt-mediated pathways that models already use for behavioral control.

Large language models can be steered at inference time through prompting or activation interventions, but activation steering methods often underperform compared to prompt-based approaches. We propose a framework that formulates prompt steering as a form of activation steering and investigates whether distilling successful prompt steering behavior into simpler, interpretable models can close this gap. Our analysis reveals that popular activation steering methods are not faithful to the mechanics of prompt steering, which applies strong interventions on some tokens while barely affecting others. Based on these insights, we introduce Prompt Steering Replacement (PSR) models that estimate token-specific steering coefficients from the activations themselves and are trained to imitate prompt-based interventions. Experiments on three steering benchmarks across multiple language models show that PSR models outperform existing activation steering methods, especially when controlling for high-coherence completions, and also compare favorably to prompting on AxBench and persona steering.

Localizing latent structures in the activation space of language models (LMs) is central to understanding and controlling their behavior. Yet, localized structures can differ substantially in their causal influence, raising the question of what makes a structure actionable. We tackle this question by casting causal influence as a product of three factors and showing empirically that they act as interpretable, distinct constraints: capacity, measuring the sensitivity of the model's output to movement along the structure, responsiveness, capturing how promotable the concept is given the current context, and alignment, reflecting how well the structure aligns with the context-specific representation of the concept. Across 4 LM families and 50 concepts, we observe that causal effectiveness requires all factors to be high; low capacity and responsiveness reduce it by 84% and 95%, respectively, while low alignment can reverse it, suppressing concept expression. Moreover, we find that causality is context-dependent rather than an intrinsic property of the structure, with causally effective directions forming a low-dimensional subspace that varies across contexts. By restricting the training of linear probes to this subspace, we introduce causal probes that achieve 17%-118% improvement in steering across models, with only 3% reduction in concept detection.