Federated Graph AGI for Cross-Border Insider Threat Intelligence in Government Financial Schemes
Organizations: Incedo Inc., New Jersey, USA · Indian Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India · University of Kent, Kent, UK
Abstract
Cross-border insider threats pose a critical challenge to government financial schemes, particularly when dealing with distributed, privacy-sensitive data across multiple jurisdictions. Existing approaches face fundamental limitations: they cannot effectively share intelligence across borders due to privacy constraints, lack reasoning capabilities to understand complex multi-step attack patterns, and fail to capture intricate graph-structured relationships in financial networks. We introduce FedGraph-AGI, a novel federated learning framework integrating Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) reasoning with graph neural networks for privacy-preserving cross-border insider threat detection. Our approach combines: (1) federated graph neural networks preserving data sovereignty; (2) Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) aggregation for heterogeneous jurisdictions; and (3) AGI-powered reasoning via Large Action Models (LAM) performing causal inference over graph data. Through experiments on a 50,000-transaction dataset across 10 jurisdictions, FedGraph-AGI achieves 92.3% accuracy, significantly outperforming federated baselines (86.1%) and centralized approaches (84.7%). Our ablation studies reveal AGI reasoning contributes 6.8% improvement, while MoE adds 4.4%. The system maintains epsilon = 1.0 differential privacy while achieving near-optimal performance and scales efficiently to 50+ clients. This represents the first integration of AGI reasoning with federated graph learning for insider threat detection, opening new directions for privacy-preserving cross-border intelligence sharing.
Figures & tables
| Metric | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Total Transactions | 50,000 | Spanning 2 years |
| Unique Users | 10,000 | Across 10 jurisdictions |
| Graph Nodes | 1,000 | Accounts & institutions |
| Graph Edges | 2,991 | Financial relationships |
| Node Feature Dim | 15 | Behavioral attributes |
| Edge Feature Dim | 8 | Transaction metadata |
| Method | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F1 | AUC | Privacy |
| Centralized Baselines (No Privacy) | ||||||
| Centralized GNN | 0.847 | 0.801 | 0.764 | 0.782 | 0.889 | |
| GraphSAGE | 0.833 | 0.785 | 0.752 | 0.768 | 0.871 | |
| FraudNE | 0.856 | 0.812 | 0.779 | 0.795 | 0.901 | |
| Federated Methods (Privacy-Preserving) | ||||||
| FedAvg | 0.823 | 0.775 | 0.738 | 0.756 | 0.854 | |
| Model Variant | F1-Score | Accuracy | F1 | Acc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full Model (FedGraph-AGI) | 0.891 | 0.923 | – | – |
| w/o AGI Reasoning | 0.823 | 0.861 | ||
| w/o Mixture-of-Experts | 0.847 | 0.889 | ||
| w/o Graph Attention | 0.856 | 0.893 | ||
| w/o Privacy Mechanisms | 0.889 | 0.921 | ||
| Only GNN (no Fed) | 0.782 | 0.847 |
Cyber Threat Intelligence
Cyber threat intelligence turns evidence about adversaries, campaigns, and vulnerabilities into knowledge that helps defenders anticipate and respond to attacks.
See all 41 papers