Diffusion Transformer (DiT) architectures have significantly advanced Text-to-Image (T2I) generation but suffer from prohibitive computational costs and deployment barriers. To address these challenges, we propose an efficient compression framework that transforms the 60-layer dual-stream MMDiT-based Qwen-Image into lightweight models without training from scratch. Leveraging this framework, we introduce Amber-Image, a series of streamlined T2I models. We first derive Amber-Image-10B using a timestep-sensitive depth pruning strategy, where retained layers are reinitialized via local weight averaging and optimized through layer-wise distillation and full-parameter fine-tuning. Building on this, we develop Amber-Image-6B by introducing a hybrid-stream architecture that converts deep-layer dual streams into a single stream initialized from the image branch, further refined via progressive distillation and lightweight fine-tuning. Our approach reduces parameters by 70% and eliminates the need for large-scale data engineering. Notably, the entire compression and training pipeline-from the 10B to the 6B variant-requires fewer than 2,000 GPU hours, demonstrating exceptional cost-efficiency compared to training from scratch. Extensive evaluations on benchmarks like DPG-Bench and LongText-Bench show that Amber-Image achieves high-fidelity synthesis and superior text rendering, matching much larger models.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Representative samples generated by Amber-Image.
Figure 2: Overview of the Amber-Image compression pipeline.
Model
Global
Entity
Attribute
Relation
Other
Overall
Seedream 3.0 ( Gao et al., 2025 )
94.31
92.65
91.36
92.78
88.24
88.27
GPT Image 1 ( OpenAI, 2025 )
88.89
88.94
89.84
92.63
90.96
85.15
Emu3-Gen ( Wang et al., 2024 )
85.21
86.68
86.84
90.22
83.15
80.60
OmniGen2 ( Wu et al., 2025b )
88.81
88.83
90.18
89.37
90.27
83.57
Janus-Pro ( Chen et al., 2025 )
86.90
88.90
89.40
89.32
89.48
84.19
SD1.5 ( Rombach et al., 2022 )
74.63
74.23
75.39
73.49
67.81
63.18
Table 1: Quantitative evaluation results on DPG.
Model
Single
Two
Counting
Colors
Position
Attribute
Overall
Seedream 3.0 ( Gao et al., 2025 )
0.990
0.960
0.910
0.930
0.470
0.800
0.840
GPT Image 1 ( OpenAI, 2025 )
0.990
0.920
0.850
0.920
0.750
0.610
0.840
Emu3-Gen ( Wang et al., 2024 )
0.98
0.71
0.34
0.81
0.17
0.21
0.54
OmniGen2 ( Wu et al., 2025b )
1.000
0.950
0.640
0.880
0.550
0.760
0.800
Janus-Pro ( Chen et al., 2025 )
0.990
0.890
0.590
0.900
0.790
0.660
0.800
PixArt- α ( Chen et al., 2023 )
0.98
0.5
0.44
0.8
0.08
0.07
0.48
Table 2: Quantitative Evaluation results on GenEval.
Model
Alignment
Text
Reasoning
Style
Diversity
Overall
Seedream 3.0 ( Gao et al., 2025 )
0.818
0.865
0.275
0.413
0.277
0.530
GPT Image 1 ( OpenAI, 2025 )
0.851
0.857
0.345
0.462
0.151
0.533
OmniGen2 ( Wu et al., 2025b )
0.804
0.680
0.271
0.377
0.242
0.475
Janus-Pro ( Chen et al., 2025 )
0.553
0.001
0.139
0.276
0.365
0.267
HiDream-I1-Full ( Cai et al., 2025 )
0.829
0.707
0.317
0.347
0.186
0.477
Lumina-Image 2.0 ( Qin et al., 2025 )
0.819
0.106
0.270
0.354
0.216
0.353
Table 3: Quantitative evaluation results on OneIG-EN.
Model
Alignment
Text
Reasoning
Style
Diversity
Overall
Seedream 3.0 ( Gao et al., 2025 )
0.793
0.928
0.281
0.397
0.243
0.528
GPT Image 1 ( OpenAI, 2025 )
0.812
0.650
0.300
0.449
0.159
0.474
Janus-Pro ( Chen et al., 2025 )
0.324
0.148
0.104
0.264
0.358
0.240
HiDream-I1-Full ( Cai et al., 2025 )
0.620
0.205
0.256
0.304
0.300
0.337
Lumina-Image 2.0 ( Qin et al., 2025 )
0.731
0.136
0.221
0.343
0.240
0.334
Qwen-Image ( Wu et al., 2025a )
0.825
0.963
0.267
0.405
0.279
0.548
Table 4: Quantitative evaluation results on OneIG-ZH.
Model
NED ↑
CLIPScore ↑
Word Accuracy ↑
2 regions
3 regions
4 regions
5 regions
average ↑
Seedream 3.0 ( Gao et al., 2025 )
0.8537
0.7821
0.6282
0.5962
0.6043
0.5610
0.5924
GPT Image 1 ( OpenAI, 2025 )
0.9478
0.7982
0.8779
0.8659
0.8731
0.8218
0.8569
SD3.5 Large ( Esser et al., 2024 )
0.8470
0.7797
0.7293
0.6825
0.6574
0.5940
0.6548
FLUX.1 [dev] ( Black Forest Labs, 2024 )
0.6879
0.7401
0.6089
0.5531
0.4661
0.4316
0.4965
Qwen-Image ( Wu et al., 2025a )
0.9116
0.8017
0.8370
0.8364
0.8313
0.8158
0.8288
Table 5: Quantitative evaluation results of English text rendering on CVTG-2K.
Model
LongText-Bench-EN
LongText-Bench-ZH
Seedream 3.0 ( Gao et al., 2025 )
0.896
0.878
GPT Image 1 ( OpenAI, 2025 )
0.956
0.619
OmniGen2 ( Wu et al., 2025b )
0.561
0.059
Janus-Pro ( Chen et al., 2025 )
0.019
0.006
HiDream-I1-Full ( Cai et al., 2025 )
0.543
0.024
FLUX.1[Dev] ( Black Forest Labs, 2024 )
0.607
0.005
Table 6: Quantitative evaluation results on LongText-Bench.