Retaining Suboptimal Actions to Follow Shifting Optima in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Value decomposition (VD) methods have achieved remarkable success in cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL). However, their reliance on the max operator for temporal-difference (TD) target calculation leads to systematic Q-value overestimation. This issue is particularly severe in MARL due to the combinatorial explosion of the joint action space, which often results in unstable learning and suboptimal policies. To address this problem, we propose QSIM, a similarity weighted Q-learning framework that reconstructs the TD target using action similarity. Instead of using the greedy joint action directly, QSIM forms a similarity weighted expectation over a structured near-greedy joint action space. This formulation allows the target to integrate Q-values from diverse yet behaviorally related actions while assigning greater influence to those that are more similar to the greedy choice. By smoothing the target with structurally relevant alternatives, QSIM effectively mitigates overestimation and improves learning stability. Extensive experiments demonstrate that QSIM can be seamlessly integrated with various VD methods, consistently yielding superior performance and stability compared to the original algorithms. Furthermore, empirical analysis confirms that QSIM significantly mitigates the systematic value overestimation in MARL. Code is available at https://github.com/MaoMaoLYJ/pymarl-qsim.

Value factorization, a popular paradigm in MARL, faces significant theoretical and algorithmic bottlenecks: its tendency to converge to suboptimal solutions remains poorly understood and unsolved. Theoretically, existing analyses fail to explain this due to their primary focus on the optimal case. To bridge this gap, we introduce a novel theoretical concept: the stable point, which characterizes the potential convergence of value factorization in general cases. Through an analysis of stable point distributions in existing methods, we reveal that non-optimal stable points are the primary cause of poor performance. However, algorithmically, making the optimal action the unique stable point is nearly infeasible. In contrast, iteratively filtering suboptimal actions by rendering them unstable emerges as a more practical approach for global optimality. Inspired by this, we propose a novel Multi-Round Value Factorization (MRVF) framework. Specifically, by measuring a non-negative payoff increment relative to the previously selected action, MRVF transforms inferior actions into unstable points, thereby driving each iteration toward a stable point with a superior action. Experiments on challenging benchmarks, including predator-prey tasks and StarCraft II Multi-Agent Challenge (SMAC), validate our analysis of stable points and demonstrate the superiority of MRVF over state-of-the-art methods.

In this paper, we study cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) where the joint reward exhibits submodularity, which is a natural property capturing diminishing marginal returns when adding agents to a team. Unlike standard MARL with additive rewards, submodular rewards model realistic scenarios where agent contributions overlap (e.g., multi-drone surveillance, collaborative exploration). We provide the first formal framework for this setting and develop algorithms with provable guarantees on sample efficiency and regret bound. For known dynamics, our greedy policy optimization achieves a $1/2$-approximation with polynomial complexity in the number of agents $K$, overcoming the exponential curse of dimensionality inherent in joint policy optimization. For unknown dynamics, we propose a UCB-based learning algorithm achieving a $1/2$-regret of $O(H^2KS\sqrt{AT})$ over $T$ episodes.