Be Wary of Your Time Series Preprocessing

Large models for time-series forecasting have been emerged as a promising paradigm for training models on heterogeneous collections of signals. These models typically rely on causal autoregressive architectures, where each observation is sequentially predicted from past. In practice, real-world time-series exhibit non-stationarities, which significantly influence predictive performance. To mitigate this, normalization is commonly employed. However, in efficient causal settings it might induce information leakage from future observations during training. Recent alternatives, including causal normalization and statistics computed from initial observations, have been proposed to address this issue, but their practical implications remain insufficiently understood. In this work, we evaluate normalization strategies for transformer-based large time-series models trained with patching and efficient causal strategy. We showcase that normalization choice significantly influences both training convergence and forecasting performance.

Time series foundation models (TSFMs) are trained on large collections of time series datasets that span various morphologies and domains. This setting exposes models to series whose scales -- typical magnitudes of their values -- can differ substantially. Affine scaling methods such as Reversible Instance Normalization (ReVIN) scale model inputs and reverse the transform before computing the loss. We show that this inversion multiplies each series' gradient by $b^p$ relative to loss on scaled targets, where $b$ is the scaling denominator (e.g., standard deviation) and $p$ is the loss degree. We call this scale-contaminated training (ScaleCon), because the scale of each series consequently becomes an importance weight, causing high-scale series to dominate training. For any scale-equivariant scaler and residual loss that is homogeneous of degree $p$, including MSE, MAE, and Quantile Loss, we prove that computing loss on scaled targets makes every mini-batch gradient and, consequently, the full optimization trajectory invariant to arbitrary independent rescaling of the training series, yielding scale-invariant training (ScaleIn). Notably, existing TSFMs use both objectives, with neither consistent reporting nor a common convention on how to compute training loss. We isolate the convergence disparity induced by ScaleCon and its correction under ScaleIn in controlled studies on synthetic and real data. In pretraining across four TSFM architectures, ScaleIn lowers MASE in all 24 architecture-benchmark comparisons, with average reductions across TSFMs of 18.8% on GIFT-Eval and 21.9% on the M-competitions. The gains extend to supervised neural forecasting, where it lowers MASE in 16 of 20 matched settings. Most existing time series forecasting pipelines can adopt ScaleIn with a one-line code change.

Time-series forecasting research has been moving steadily toward larger architectures, from specialized transformers to general-purpose foundation models, on the assumption that capacity is what unlocks accuracy. We take the opposite position: most of the gap can be closed at far lower cost by tuning preprocessing rather than scaling models. We use Ridge regression as the testbed, since it has a closed-form solution and interpretable weights, which let the optimal hyperparameters be read off the search directly. We search over context length, local normalization, regularization, and augmentation on eight standard benchmarks and find three patterns. (1) Optimal lookback is strongly series-specific and often non-monotonic in forecast horizon, with fitted power-law exponents ranging from $+0.46$ on ETTm2 to $-0.19$ on Exchange and Traffic, challenging the convention that longer horizons need longer history. (2) Normalizing over a learned trailing fraction of the context, rather than its entirety, is almost universally preferred. (3) Series within the same dataset often disagree on hyperparameters; the optimal degree of cross-series sharing varies from fully shared to fully per-series. The resulting models beat prior linear forecasters on most dataset-horizon entries and exceed Transformer, MLP, and CNN baselines on six of eight benchmarks. The optimized hyperparameters also serve as a diagnostic on the data itself, revealing structures that larger models absorb silently into their learned parameters. We provide an accompanying interactive online demonstration and the code at https://sakanaai.github.io/SearchCast/.