LGD-Net: Latent-Guided Dual-Stream Network for HER2 Scoring with Task-Specific Domain Knowledge
Organizations: School of Mathematics and Statistics, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, 350117, China · Department of Oncology, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350117, China
Abstract
It is a critical task to evalaute HER2 expression level accurately for breast cancer evaluation and targeted treatment therapy selection. However, the standard multi-step Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining is resource-intensive, expensive, and time-consuming, which is also often unavailable in many areas. Consequently, predicting HER2 levels directly from H&E slides has emerged as a potential alternative solution. It has been shown to be effective to use virtual IHC images from H&E images for automatic HER2 scoring. However, the pixel-level virtual staining methods are computationally expensive and prone to reconstruction artifacts that can propagate diagnostic errors. To address these limitations, we propose the Latent-Guided Dual-Stream Network (LGD-Net), a novel framework that employes cross-modal feature hallucination instead of explicit pixel-level image generation. LGD-Net learns to map morphological H&E features directly to the molecular latent space, guided by a teacher IHC encoder during training. To ensure the hallucinated features capture clinically relevant phenotypes, we explicitly regularize the model training with task-specific domain knowledge, specifically nuclei distribution and membrane staining intensity, via lightweight auxiliary regularization tasks. Extensive experiments on the public BCI dataset demonstrate that LGD-Net achieves state-of-the-art performance, significantly outperforming baseline methods while enabling efficient inference using single-modality H&E inputs.
Figures & tables
| Method | Acc(%, ) | F1 ( ) | ( ) |
|---|---|---|---|
| H&E Unimodal | 82.29 | 0.7935 | 0.7543 |
| IHC Unimodal | 89.46 | 0.8906 | 0.8642 |
| ImageConcat ( H&E + real IHC ) | 90.99 | 0.8929 | 0.8724 |
| FeatureConcat ( H&E + real IHC) | 93.76 | 0.9429 | 0.9208 |
| FeatureFusion (H&E + real IHC) | 94.37 | 0.9375 | 0.9190 |
| LGD-Net (Ours) (H&E) | 95.60 | 0.9644 | 0.9453 |
| Variant | Halluc. | Attn. | Bio-Reg | Acc (%) | F1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A (Baseline) | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | 82.29 | 0.7935 | 0.7543 |
| B (Feat. Align) | ✓ | Concat | ✗ | 92.53 | 0.9120 | 0.8914 |
| C (Dynamic) | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | 93.35 | 0.9344 | 0.8884 |
| D (w/ Nuclei) | ✓ | ✓ | Nuclei | 94.27 | 0.9498 | 0.9239 |
| E (w/ Memb.) | ✓ | ✓ | Memb. | 94.78 | 0.9522 | 0.9281 |
| F (Full) | ✓ | ✓ | Both | 95.60 | 0.9644 | 0.9453 |
Computational Pathology
Computational pathology uses algorithms to analyze digitized tissue images for diagnosis, prognosis, biomarker discovery, and clinical decision support.
See all 279 papers