The dataset distributions in offline reinforcement learning (RL) often exhibit complex and multi-modal distributions, necessitating expressive policies to capture such distributions beyond widely-used Gaussian policies. To handle such complex and multi-modal datasets, in this paper, we propose Flow Actor-Critic, a new actor-critic method for offline RL, based on recent flow policies. The proposed method not only uses the flow model for actor as in previous flow policies but also exploits the expressive flow model for conservative critic acquisition to prevent Q-value explosion in out-of-data regions. To this end, we propose a new form of critic regularizer based on the flow behavior proxy model obtained as a byproduct of flow-based actor design. Leveraging the flow model in this joint way, we achieve new state-of-the-art performance for test datasets of offline RL including the D4RL and recent OGBench benchmarks.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: BC models on a synthetic four-component Gaussian mixture dataset: Top row - samples from each BC model. Bottom row - log-density or ELBO plot.
Figure 2: weight wβ^
Gaussian Policies
Diffusion Policies
Flow Policies
Task Category
BC
IQL
ReBRAC
IDQL
SRPO
CAC
FAWAC
FBRAC
IFQL
FQL
FAC (Ours)
antmaze-large-navigate
10.6
53.4
80.8
20.8
10.6
32.8
6.4
60.2
28.0
78.6
92.6 ± 2.5
antmaze-giant-navigate
0.2
4.0
26.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.8
2.6
8.6
23.0 ± 5.1
humanoidmaze-medium-navigate
2.0
32.8
21.8
0.8
1.4
52.8
19.4
38.4
60.4
57.4
75.6 ± 3.6
humanoidmaze-large-navigate
0.4
2.4
2.6
0.6
0.2
0.6
0.2
2.2
11.0
4.2
8.3 ± 5.5
antsoccer-arena-navigate
1.0
8.4
0.0
11.8
1.0
1.8
12.4
16.0
33.2
60.2
67.7 ± 2.9
Table 1: Evaluation over 55 singletasks of the OGBench. For each task category, we report the final performance averaged across its 5 singletasks, over 8 seeds (4 seeds for pixel-based tasks), with ± indicating the standard deviation. Full evaluation results on the 55 singletasks are in Table 3 .
Gaussian Policies
Diffusion Policies
Flow Policies
MuJoCo Tasks
TD3+BC
IQL
CQL
MCQ
EPQ
SPOT
ReBRAC
IDQL
SRPO
CAC
QIPO-OT
FQL
FAC (Ours)
halfcheetah-m
48.3
47.4
44.0
64.3
67.3
58.4
65.6
51.0
60.4
69.1
54.2
60.3 ± 1.1
65.0 ± 1.5
hopper-m
59.3
66.3
58.5
78.4
101.3
86.0
102.0
65.4
95.5
80.7
94.1
68.1 ± 3.4
91.9 ± 3.9
walker2d-m
83.7
78.3
72.5
91.0
87.8
86.4
82.5
82.5
84.4
83.1
87.6
77.2 ± 2.5
85.2 ± 0.9
halfcheetah-mr
44.6
44.2
45.5
56.8
62.0
52.2
51.0
45.9
51.4
58.7
48.0
49.3 ± 0.5
55.4 ± 2.7
hopper-mr
60.9
94.7
95.0
101.6
97.8
100.2
98.1
92.1
101.2
99.7
101.3
49.8 ± 7.2
99.1 ± 0.9
Table 2: Evaluation on 23 tasks of the D4RL. We report the final performance averaged over 8 seeds, with ± indicating the standard deviation. For MuJoCo datasets, we use the following abbreviations: m for medium , mr for medium-replay , me for medium-expert .
Figure 3: Empirical analysis of components. (a) Effect of flow-based critic penalization (CP) on performance under N candidate actions. (b) Performances across actor regularization coefficient λ and critic penalization coefficient α . (c) Influence by the fidelity of flow behavior proxy under flow steps T . (d) Performance of weight function designs. (e) Performance under different ϵ schemes.
Figure 4: Offline-to-online results, averaged over 8 seeds with standard deviation. The gray shaded region indicates the offline phase, and the online fine-tuning phase is left unshaded. Full plots on 15 tasks are in Fig. 7 .
Appendix figures & tables10 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Figure 5: Flow behavior proxy model with different step counts of the Euler method.
Figure 6: A comparison of FAC and baselines in a continuous action bandit problem. (a) Dataset and true Q value of the problem. (b) Comparison of baselines and FAC. (c) The IS ratio in the critic penalization of SVR. (d) Results of FQL under two actor regularization coefficients λ={1,10} .
Gaussian Policies
Diffusion Policies
Flow Policies
Task
BC
IQL
ReBRAC
IDQL
SRPO
CAC
FAWAC
FBRAC
IFQL
FQL
FAC (Ours)
antmaze-large-navigate-singletask-task1-v0 ( ∗ )
0
48
91
0
0
42
1
70
24
80
94.0 ± 3.0
antmaze-large-navigate-singletask-task2-v0
6
42
88
14
4
1
0
35
8
57
86.0 ± 5.7
antmaze-large-navigate-singletask-task3-v0
29
72
51
26
3
49
12
83
52
93
97.5 ± 2.1
antmaze-large-navigate-singletask-task4-v0
8
51
84
62
45
17
10
37
18
80
89.5 ± 7.7
antmaze-large-navigate-singletask-task5-v0
10
54
90
2
1
55
9
76
38
83
96.0 ± 4.8
Appendix
Table 3: Full offline RL evaluation results on the OGBench. ( ∗ ) indicates the default task in each task category. We report the final performance averaged over 8 seeds (4 seeds for pixel-based tasks)
Transformer based
SSM based
MLP based
MuJoCo Tasks
DT
DC
QDT
Reinformer
DM
FAC (Ours)
halfcheetah-m
42.6
43.0
42.3
42.9
43.8
65.0 ± 1.5
hopper-m
67.6
92.5
66.5
81.6
98.5
91.9 ± 3.9
walker2d-m
74.0
79.2
67.1
80.5
80.3
85.2 ± 0.9
halfcheetah-mr
36.6
41.3
35.6
39.0
40.8
55.4 ± 2.7
hopper-mr
82.7
94.2
52.1
83.3
89.1
99.1 ± 0.9
Appendix
Table 4: Comparison with sequence model based baselines. For MuJoCo datasets, we use the following abbreviations: m for medium , mr for medium-replay , me for medium-expert .
Figure 7: Offline-to-online results on 15 tasks, averaged over 8 seeds with standard deviation. The gray shaded region indicates the offline phase, and the online fine-tuning phase is left unshaded.
Hyperparameters
Value
Learning rate
0.0003
Optimizer
Adam ( Kingma & Ba, 2014 )
Gradient Steps
1000000
Minibatch size
256
MLP dimension
[512, 512, 512, 512]
Nonlinearity
GELU ( Hendrycks & Gimpel, 2016 )
Appendix
Table 5: Hyperparameters for FQL on the D4RL-MuJoCo domain.
Tasks (Datasets)
BC coefficient λ
halfcheetah-medium-v2
3.0
hopper-medium-v2
100.0
walker2d-medium-v2
300.0
halfcheetah-medium-replay-v2
30.0
hopper-medium-replay-v2
100.0
walker2d-medium-replay-v2
300.0
Appendix
Table 6: BC Coefficient λ for FQL on the D4RL-MuJoCo domain.
Hyperparameters
Value
Learning rate
0.0003
Optimizer
Adam ( Kingma & Ba, 2014 )
Gradient Steps
1M (default), 500K ( OGBench :pixel-based tasks)
Minibatch size
256
Epochs for flow proxy model
250 (default),
125 ( D4RL:MuJoCo, OGBench:pixel-based tasks )
Appendix
Table 7: Hyperparameters for our method
Table 8: Critic penalization coefficient α and actor regularization coefficient λ of FAC
Figure 8: Computational costs of FAC and baselines
We propose Flow-Anchored Noise-conditioned Q-Learning (FAN), a highly efficient and high-performing offline reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm. Recent work has shown that expressive flow policies and distributional critics improve offline RL performance, but at a high computational cost. Specifically, flow policies require iterative sampling to produce a single action, and distributional critics require computation over multiple samples (e.g., quantiles) to estimate value. To address these inefficiencies while maintaining high performance, we introduce FAN. Our method employs a behavior regularization technique that uses a single flow policy iteration and requires a single Gaussian noise sample for distributional critics. Our theoretical analysis of convergence and performance bounds demonstrates that these simplifications not only improve efficiency but also lead to superior task performance. Experiments on robotic manipulation and locomotion tasks demonstrate that FAN achieves state-of-the-art performance while significantly reducing both training and inference runtimes. We release our code at https://github.com/brianlsy98/FAN.
Sungyoung Lee, Dohyeong Kim, Eshan Balachandar +2
The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA · Independent Researcher, Seoul, South Korea.
Recent progress in offline reinforcement learning (RL) has been driven by expressive generative actors such as diffusion and flow-matching policies, which capture multimodal behavior in offline datasets. However, these actors require multiple denoising or integration steps per action and thus incur substantial overhead at every decision in deployment. In this work, we revisit where capacity should be invested in an offline actor--critic method. Since the critic is used only during training and is discarded at deployment while the actor runs at every decision step, allocating capacity to the critic rather than the actor is more favorable for inference-time efficiency. However, scaling MLP critics in offline RL is known to introduce several distinct instabilities that have, in practice, kept critics shallow. We identify three distinct failure modes that arise when critics are deepened in offline RL---optimization, bootstrap-noise amplification, and value-range drift---and address each with a corresponding ingredient: a residual MLP backbone, n-step bootstrap targets, and a categorical cross-entropy loss. Combining these ingredients with a lightweight deterministic actor, we propose LAC (Light Actor, deep Critic). On OGBench, LAC matches the strongest diffusion- and flow-matching baselines while achieving up to 4x lower inference latency, comparable to one-step distilled policies without distillation. Its critic recipe also transfers across actor parametrizations.
Guhyeon Kang, Jaehwi Lee, Minhae Kwon
Sungkyunkwan University Republic of Korea · Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Republic of Korea · Soongsil University Republic of Korea
Offline reinforcement learning aims to learn a policy solely from fixed datasets, which often contain multimodal action distributions. Flow policies can naturally represent such multimodal behaviors, but learning an efficient one-step flow policy remains challenging: standard value guidance often leads to mode collapse or exploits overestimation bias in out-of-distribution regions. To address this, we introduce One-step Flow policy via Optimal Transport (OptiFlow), a framework for one-step flow policy learning as a structured sample-allocation problem. OptiFlow jointly trains a value-aware reference flow policy and an efficient one-step policy, coupling their action samples through state-wise entropic optimal transport. For each state, critic-estimated values define the priority of distillation target actions, while the action-distance cost ensures geometrically compatible pairings. By avoiding direct critic maximization, our transport-guided approach enables in-distribution exploitation by anchoring the one-step policy to high-value, dataset-supported modes without the risk of out-of-distribution divergence. Experimental results demonstrate that OptiFlow effectively captures optimal multimodal behaviors and achieves strong performance across diverse offline RL benchmarks. Our code is available at https://github.com/Yonsei-DILLab/OptiFlow.
Jaehun Shon, Jinha Choi, Jongwook Jeon +1
Department of Artificial Intelligence, Yonsei University