Long video understanding is challenging due to rich and complicated multimodal clues in long temporal range.Current methods adopt reasoning to improve the model's ability to analyze complex video clues in long videos via text-form reasoning.However,the existing literature suffers from the fact that the text-only reasoning under fixed video context may exacerbate hallucinations since detailed crucial clues are often ignored under limited video context length due to the temporal redundancy of long videos.To address this gap,we propose Video-TwG,a curriculum reinforced framework that employs a novel Think-with-Grounding paradigm,enabling video LLMs to actively decide when to perform on-demand grounding during interleaved text-video reasoning, selectively zooming into question-relevant clips only when necessary.Video-TwG can be trained end-to-end in a straightforward manner, without relying on complex auxiliary modules or heavily annotated reasoning tracesIn detail,we design a Two-stage Reinforced Curriculum Strategy, where the model first learns think-with-grounding behavior on a small short-video GQA dataset with grounding labels,and then scales to diverse general QA data with videos of diverse domains to encourage generalization. Further, to handle complex think-with-grounding reasoning for various kinds of data,we propose TwG-GRPO algorithm which features the fine-grained grounding reward, self-confirmed pseudo reward and accuracy-gated mechanism.Finally,we propose to construct a new TwG-51K dataset that facilitates training. Experiments on Video-MME, LongVideoBench, and MLVU show that Video-TwG consistently outperforms strong LVU baselines.Further ablation validates the necessity of our Two-stage Reinforced Curriculum Strategy and shows our TwG-GRPO better leverages diverse unlabeled data to improve grounding quality and reduce redundant groundings without sacrificing QA performance.
Figures & tables
Figure 1. Conceptual level comparison between our Video-TwG and existing video reasoning models. The frame with blue triangle means the important detail for this question. Existing reasoning models reach the wrong answer via reasoning on missed video context, while we address it via leveraging grounding during reasoning to dynamically perceive important clues.
Figure 2. The trajectory of think-with-grounding . Initially, the coarse-grained video and question are given and in each turn, the model gives a thinking process and an action based on the history interaction. If the action is grounding, the grounded video clip is zoomed in with a fine-grained representation and added to the context. If the action is answering, the reasoning process stops.
Figure 3. The illustration of our proposed TwG-GRPO algorithm.
Method
Video-MME
LongVideoBench
MLVU-MC
short
medium
long
overall
(8s,15s]
(15s,60s]
(180s,600s)
(900s,3600s]
overall
Video-LLaVA-7B
45.3
38.0
36.2
39.9
-
-
-
-
39.1
47.3
ShareGPT4Video-8B
48.3
36.3
35.0
39.9
-
-
-
-
39.7
46.4
VideoChat2-7B
-
-
33.2
39.5
-
-
-
-
-
-
LongVA-7B
61.1
50.4
46.2
52.6
-
-
-
-
47.8
56.3
Long-LLaVA-7B
61.9
51.4
45.4
52.9
-
-
-
-
-
-
Table 1. Results of our Video-TwG and baselines on three mainstream long video benchmarks: Video-MME, LongVideoBench, MLVU. For MLVU, we evaluate the multiple choices questions. ∗ means our reproduced results. ⋅↑ is the relative gain against the Qwen2.5-VL-7B. The best and second are marked with bold and underline .
Method
Video-MME
short
medium
long
overall
Base 1
56.2
43.2
40.4
46.6
Base-TwG-CoT 1
56.9
43.2
42.1
47.4
Base-Think 2
59.2
46.4
43.2
49.6
Base-MultiGrained 4
63.1
45.9
42.7
50.6
Base-Think-MultiGrained 5
63.0
46.9
45.3
51.7
Table 2. Ablation experiments of different variants of the base Qwen2.5-VL-7B on Video-MME.
Figure 4. Ablation results on Video-MME of our models with different training stages.
Figure 5. Training curves of several variants of our Video-TwG in stage 1. The curves are smoothed for aesthetics. It’s the same below.
Method
Video-MME
short
medium
long
overall
stage 1 w/o gated mechanism
60.2
48.1
43.6
50.6
stage 1
61.2
46.9
45.1
51.1
Table 3. The ablation results of the accuracy-gated mechanism in stage 1 training.
Figure 6. Training curves of several variants of our Video-TwG in stage 2.
Method
Video-MME
short
medium
long
overall
Video-TwG w/o Rpseudo
63.4
48.0
47.2
52.9
Video-TwG
63.7
49.4
47.7
53.6
Table 4. The ablation results of the self-confirmed pseudo reward in stage 2 training.
Figure 7. The case study on Video-R1, Qwen2.5-VL-7B, Our Video-TwG. The location of the crucial video clues for this question is marked with green boxes.
Method
Video-MME
short
medium
long
overall
Video-TwG w/o Rpseudo
682
687
725
2094
Video-TwG
615
584
566
1765
Table 5. The number of samples that has grounding action on Video-MME benchmark.
Method
Video-MME
short
medium
long
overall
Video-TwG w/o Rpseudo
65.5
55.3
51.4
57.3
Video-TwG
68.1
54.5
53.5
58.9
Table 6. The evaluation results on the grounded video clip on Video-MME by InternVL-3.5-38B for our Video-TwG w/ and w/o Rpseudo .