Organizations: Department of Biomedical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore · College of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China · College of information science and engineering, Ritsumeikan university, ibaraki Osaka, Japan · Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Accurate interpretation of electrocardiogram (ECG) signals is crucial for diagnosing cardiovascular diseases. Recent multimodal approaches that integrate ECGs with accompanying clinical reports show strong potential, but they still face two main concerns from a modality perspective: (1) intra-modality: existing models process ECGs in a lead-agnostic manner, overlooking spatial-temporal dependencies across leads, which restricts their effectiveness in modeling fine-grained diagnostic patterns; (2) inter-modality: existing methods directly align ECG signals with clinical reports, introducing modality-specific biases due to the free-text nature of the reports. In light of these two issues, we propose CG-DMER, a contrastive-generative framework for disentangled multimodal ECG representation learning, powered by two key designs: (1) Spatial-temporal masked modeling is designed to better capture fine-grained temporal dynamics and inter-lead spatial dependencies by applying masking across both spatial and temporal dimensions and reconstructing the missing information. (2) A representation disentanglement and alignment strategy is designed to mitigate unnecessary noise and modality-specific biases by introducing modality-specific and modality-shared encoders, ensuring a clearer separation between modality-invariant and modality-specific representations. Experiments on three public datasets demonstrate that CG-DMER achieves state-of-the-art performance across diverse downstream tasks.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: A schematic view of the proposed method.
PTBXL-Super
PTBXL-Sub
PTBXL-Form
PTBXL-Rhythm
CPSC2018
CSN
Method
1%
10%
100%
1%
10%
100%
1%
10%
100%
1%
10%
100%
1%
10%
100%
1%
10%
100%
Random Init (CNN)
70.45
77.09
81.61
55.82
67.60
77.91
55.82
62.54
73.00
46.26
62.36
79.29
54.96
71.47
78.33
47.22
63.17
73.13
Random Init (Trans)
70.31
75.27
77.54
53.36
67.56
77.43
53.47
61.84
72.08
45.36
60.33
77.26
52.93
68.00
77.44
45.55
60.23
71.37
SimCLR [ 18 ]
63.41
69.77
73.53
60.84
68.27
73.39
54.98
56.97
62.52
51.41
69.44
77.73
59.78
68.52
76.54
59.02
67.26
73.20
BYOL [ 19 ]
71.70
73.83
76.45
57.16
67.44
71.64
48.73
61.63
70.82
41.99
74.40
77.17
60.88
74.42
78.75
54.20
71.92
74.69
BarlowTwins [ 20 ]
72.87
75.96
78.41
62.57
70.84
74.34
52.12
60.39
66.14
50.12
73.54
77.62
55.12
72.75
78.39
60.72
71.64
77.43
Table 1: Linear probing performance comparison between CG-DMER and existing ECG representation learning methods. The best and second-best results are highlighted in red and blue , respectively. † denotes results reproduced by our implementation.
Methods
PTBXL-Super
PTBXL-Sub
PTBXL-Form
PTBXL-Rhythm
CPSC2018
CSN
Average
ETP† [ 10 ]
49.63
62.25
57.44
66.56
67.13
60.22
60.54
MERL (ResNet) [ 11 ]
74.20
75.70
65.90
78.50
82.80
74.40
75.25
MERL (Vit) [ 11 ]
73.43
72.62
62.75
75.90
79.21
72.37
72.71
C-MELT [ 12 ]
75.12
74.38
65.55
79.87
81.61
74.43
75.16
CG-DMER (Ours)
75.65
74.62
66.44
80.77
82.93
75.59
76.00
Table 2: Zero-shot performance comparison across multiple datasets. The best and second-best results are highlighted in red and blue , respectively. † denotes results reproduced by our implementation.
Methods
Le_rec
Lt_rec
Lorth
LSigLIP
Linear (1%)
Zero-shot
Variant 1
-
-
-
-
64.43
73.36
Variant 2
✓
-
-
-
67.39
74.87
Variant 3
✓
✓
-
-
67.82
75.00
Variant 4
✓
✓
✓
-
69.31
75.77
CG-DMER
✓
✓
✓
✓
70.15
76.00
Table 3: Effects of model components.
Figure 2: Results of CG-DMER with different patch numbers and masking ratio on linear probing and zero-shot.
Figure 3: T-SNE visualization on the CSN test set.
Graduate School of Engineering Science Yokohama National University Yokohama, Japan · Division of Cardiology Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama, Japan · Technology and Innovation Department Fukuda Denshi Co.,Ltd Tokyo, Japan