VLA Knows Its Limits: Adaptive Execution Horizons for Robot Policies

Action chunking is a standard execution strategy in modern Vision-Language-Action (VLA) frameworks, but fixed execution horizons impose a trade-off between efficiency and accuracy. Short chunks require frequent inference and may cause oscillatory behavior, whereas long chunks can become misaligned with newly observed states. We address this limitation with an adaptive action chunking approach based on internal cross-attention dynamics in the action expert. We observe that, as the prediction horizon extends, action-to-observation cross-attention becomes increasingly dispersed and its entropy rises toward a plateau. This pattern is associated with higher action prediction error and provides an online signal that the current observation offers limited grounding for further open-loop execution. Based on this observation, we introduce a training-free truncation mechanism that detects sustained high-entropy plateaus and dynamically selects the execution horizon during inference. The method uses attention weights already computed by the policy and introduces negligible additional overhead. Evaluations on $π_{0.5}$ and X-VLA across RoboTwin 2.0, LIBERO, and three real-world manipulation tasks show improved average task success over fixed-horizon and adaptive chunking baselines, while preserving efficient closed-loop control. These results show that cross-attention dynamics can provide a practical internal signal for adaptive action execution in VLAs.

Action-chunking vision-language-action (VLA) models predict sequences of future robot actions. Under fixed-horizon execution, the robot executes a fixedlength prefix of each predicted chunk before invoking the policy again, leaving the remaining predictions unused. For a given number of executed actions, short execution horizons require more policy calls. Extending the execution horizon amortizes policy inference cost over more actions. However, uniformly applying long horizons across episodes can limit opportunities for precise corrections. To address this limitation, we propose PICES (Perturbation-Informed Chunk and Execution Horizon Selection), a training-free method that jointly selects an action chunk and the number of actions executed before the next policy call. Within a single policy call, the action expert generates a batch of action chunks from multiple initial noise samples and their locally perturbed counterparts, using the same conditioning features across all samples. PICES exploits differences between corresponding actions in each nominal chunk and its counterpart to determine candidate-specific execution horizons and select a nominal chunk for execution. Experiments on simulation benchmarks and real-world manipulation tasks demonstrate that PICES achieves speedup by up to 2.3x in wall-clock policy inference time on Jetson Orin and Thor relative to fixed horizon baselines while improving the success rate.

Existing chunk-based Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models execute a fixed number of actions (i.e., execution horizon) before replanning, turning replanning into a task-agnostic periodic schedule that is independent of task progress. As a result, when no replanning boundary falls before a critical manipulation stage, it is executed from a stale chunk rather than a freshly replanned one. To address this limitation, we propose Bernoulli-Continuation Policy (BCP), a lightweight, plug-and-play framework for adaptive horizon execution that keeps the base VLA frozen. Given a fixed-length action chunk, its continuation head decomposes execution-horizon selection into a sequence of continue-or-replan decisions, which imposes an ordinal, prefix-sharing inductive bias over candidate horizons rather than treating them as independent classes. Since the optimal horizon for each chunk is not observable, we train this head with reinforcement learning from trajectory-level outcomes and introduce a Replanning-Efficiency Reward that jointly rewards task success and efficient VLA usage, discouraging the policy from collapsing to unnecessarily short horizons. On RoboTwin 2.0 with LingBot-VLA as the base policy, BCP improves the average success rate by +11.08% on 13 low-success tasks and from 89.88% to 93.94% (+4.06%) across all 50 tasks. Although trained only under the Clean setting, BCP generalizes to the Randomized setting, raising the average success rate by +4.06%. It also transfers to a different base policy $π_{0.5}$, achieving a better result on LIBERO (+1.7%) and, notably, on the harder LIBERO-PRO (+6.8%). On a real robot, BCP lifts success from 74% to 92% and from 44% to 84% on two manipulation tasks. Meanwhile, its negligible overhead, combined with higher success, makes BCP's overall runtime even lower than the fixed-horizon baselines.