From Basis to Basis: Gaussian Particle Representation for Interpretable PDE Operators
Authors: Zhihao Li, Yu Feng, Zhilu Lai, Wei Wang
Organizations: The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), Guangzhou, China · The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China
Learning PDE dynamics for fluids increasingly relies on neural operators and Transformer-based models, yet these approaches often lack interpretability and struggle with localized, high-frequency structures while incurring quadratic cost in spatial samples. We propose representing fields with a Gaussian basis, where learned atoms carry explicit geometry (centers, anisotropic scales, weights) and form a compact, mesh-agnostic, directly visualizable state. Building on this representation, we introduce a Gaussian Particle Operator that acts in modal space: learned Gaussian modal windows perform a Petrov-Galerkin measurement, and PG Gaussian Attention enables global cross-scale coupling. This basis-to-basis design is resolution-agnostic and achieves near-linear complexity in N for a fixed modal budget, supporting irregular geometries and seamless 2D-to-3D extension. On standard PDE benchmarks and real datasets, our method attains state-of-the-art competitive accuracy while providing intrinsic interpretability.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Overview of the Gaussian Basis Field framework. Given the physics field a(x) , an encoder Eθ produces G Gaussian components per spatial location (mean μ , scale σ , and mixture weight w ). These define a Gaussian field that is evaluated at queries to form the basis z , which is decoded by a fixed decoder fϕdec to reconstruct the output field.
Figure 2: Architecture of the Gaussian Particle Operator (GPO). The pipeline encodes a(x) into a Gaussian field (μ,σ,w) , evaluates a basis Z , applies the modal operator Oψ , and decodes to u^(x) ; black arrows denote forward computation and red arrows denote gradients.
Model
NS2D
NS3D
ERA5-temp
ERA5-wind u
Carra
Airfoil
Turbulent
PlanetSWE
(Geo-)FNO
3.24E-02
5.07E-01
7.09E-03
1.02E-01
3.50E-01
5.12E-03
4.82E-01
9.23E-02
M2NO
2.76E-02
4.65E-01
3.35E-03
7.15E-02
3.62E-01
1.98E-03
4.53E-01
8.96E-02
CNO
9.27E-02
8.12E-01
1.24E-02
1.86E-01
6.89E-01
4.65E-03
7.91E-01
1.57E-01
LSM
3.11E-02
3.80E-01
5.86E-03
8.23E-02
4.05E-01
5.37E-03
4.16E-01
9.58E-02
AMG
3.12E-02
4.32E-01
6.11E-03
8.79E-02
3.21E-01
3.09E-03
4.47E-01
8.14E-02
GT
8.81E-02
5.39E-01
5.44E-03
1.55E-01
3.73E-01
8.26E-03
5.41E-01
1.23E-01
Table 1: Performance comparison with baselines on benchmarks. L2 loss is recorded.
Figure 3: Interpretable visualization on an in-distribution sample (above) and an out-of-distribution sample (below) . Left to right: ground truth, reconstruction from the Gaussian basis, absolute error, and learned Gaussian particles overlaid (ellipses: center μ , axes ∝σ , color/size ∝w ).
Figure 4: Layer-wise evolution of the Gaussian particle field. Particle activations after successive PG Gaussian Attention layers.
Figure 5: Rollout stability schematic: error versus rollout horizon.
Figure 6: NS2D energy spectrum (log–log).
Appendix figures & tables4 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Benchmarks
Model Configurations
hidden_dim
num_layers
num_heads
num_gaussians
NS2D
128
8
8
32
NS3D
64
8
4
16
ERA5-temp
64
4
4
16
ERA5-wind u
64
4
4
16
Carra
64
4
4
16
Appendix
Table 2: Model configurations of GPO.
Model Configuration
L2 Error
w/o PG Operator
8.57E-02
w/o Gaussian Field
7.44E-02
num_gaussian = 1
6.28E-02
num_gaussian = 16
4.21E-02
num_gaussian = 64
3.84E-02
GPO (Baseline)
3.90E-02
Appendix
Table 3: Ablation results comparing the L2 error of different configurations.
Model
Param Count
Param (MB)
GPU Mem (MiB)
Train (s/epoch)
Inference (s/epoch)
FNO
640,305
4.84
949
28.27
0.5
LSM
19,187,457
73.23
2,875
48.42
1.73
Galerkin Transformer
1,096,321
4.18
4,301
65.29
2.96
GNOT
2,485,901
9.48
8,643
139.42
6.09
Transolver
3,069,889
11.71
4,917
97.03
4.10
ONO
1,596,673
6.09
6,163
94.80
4.27
Appendix
Table 4: Computational efficiency comparison across models (measured with input size 64 × 64 × 3, batch size 16).
Figure 7: Interpretable visualization of ERA5 on an in-distribution sample (above) and an out-of-distribution sample (below) . Left to right: ground truth, reconstruction from the Gaussian basis and learned Gaussian particles overlaid (ellipses: center μ , axes ∝σ , color/size ∝w ).
Neural operators provide efficient surrogates for spatiotemporal PDE systems, but purely data-driven formulations often accumulate substantial errors during long-horizon autoregressive prediction and may fail to exploit available governing-equation structure. Existing approaches incorporate physics primarily through residual-based training objectives or PDE-specific architectural constraints, which can introduce optimization difficulties or limit architectural generality. In this work, we introduce a representation-level approach to physics integration in which a feed-forward Gaussian splatting (FFGS) representation serves as a continuous interface between discretized solution fields and governing operators. The FFGS representation reconstructs the state as a continuous Gaussian field with closed-form spatial derivatives, allowing available physical PDE operators to be integrated directly within the learned evolution map without introducing a physics-residual loss. We evaluate the framework across two- and three-dimensional PDE systems, including advection, diffusion, nonlinear self-advection, and reaction dynamics. Over long-horizon autoregressive rollouts, the proposed framework reduces relative ℓ2 error by 1.5×--2.2× compared with the strongest purely data-driven baseline across the benchmark suite, while consistently improving spectral fidelity. The framework also remains effective when the governing equations are partially known, demonstrating robustness to incomplete physics. These results demonstrate that continuous field representations can provide a practical interface for incorporating known physical structure into generic neural-operator surrogates.
Jihao Zhang, Junyi Guo, Jian-Xun Wang
Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Neural operators have emerged as powerful data-driven solvers for PDEs, offering substantial acceleration over classical numerical methods. However, existing transformer-based operators still face critical challenges when modeling PDEs on complex geometries: directly processing over massive mesh points is computationally expensive, while operating in raw discretization coordinates may obscure the intrinsic geometry where physical interactions are more naturally expressed. To address these limitations, we introduce the Charted Axial Transformer Operator (CATO), a geometry-adaptive and derivative-aware neural operator for PDEs on general geometries. Instead of applying attention directly in the physical coordinate system, CATO learns a continuous latent chart that maps mesh coordinates into a learned chart space, where chart-conditioned axial attention efficiently captures long-range dependencies with reduced computational cost. In addition, CATO introduces a derivative-aware physics loss for steady-state PDEs that jointly supervises solution values, mesh-consistent gradients, and an auxiliary flux-like field, improving physical fidelity and reducing oversmoothing. We further provide a theoretical approximation result showing that, under a favorable chart, charted axial attention can represent low-rank axial solution operators with controlled error, and that small chart perturbations induce bounded approximation degradation. CATO achieves the best performance across all evaluated datasets, yielding an average improvement of approximately 26.76% over the strongest competing baselines while reducing the number of parameters by 81.98%. These results highlight the effectiveness of learning geometry-adaptive charts and derivative-aware physical supervision for accurate and efficient PDE operator learning.
Spectral neural operators achieve strong performance for PDE learning, but rely on fixed global bases that limit their ability to represent spatially heterogeneous and multiscale dynamics. We propose Adaptive Basis Learning (ABLE), a framework that learns data-dependent spectral representations instead of relying on predefined bases. ABLE constructs a spatially adaptive Parseval frame via a learned ancillary density, enabling the operator to act in a lifted spectral space while preserving invertibility and maintaining O(NlogN) complexity through FFT-based implementation. This shifts the source of expressivity from spectral coefficients to the representation itself, allowing the model to capture localized structures and non-translation-invariant interactions more efficiently. ABLE integrates seamlessly into existing neural operator architectures as a drop-in replacement for spectral layers. Across a range of benchmarks ABLE improves accuracy over strong baselines, with the largest gains in regimes characterized by sharp gradients and multiscale behavior. Moreover, augmenting existing models (e.g., U-FNO, HPM) with ABLE further enhances their performance, demonstrating its role as a general and complementary spectral refinement. Our results highlight that the data-driven choice of representation, rather than operator complexity alone, is a key bottleneck in neural operator design. By learning the basis itself, ABLE provides a principled and efficient framework for improving spectral methods in PDE learning.
Xuxiang Zhao, Angelica I. Aviles-Rivero
Qiuzhen College, Tsinghua University · YMSC, Tsinghua University