A 1/R Law for Kurtosis Contrast in Balanced Mixtures
Authors: Yuda Bi, Wenjun Xiao, Linhao Bai, Vince D Calhoun
Organizations: Tri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA · Department of Computer Science, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052 USA · School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
Kurtosis-based Independent Component Analysis (ICA) weakens in wide, balanced mixtures. We prove a sharp redundancy law: for a standardized projection with effective width Reff (participation ratio), the population excess kurtosis obeys ∣κ(y)∣=O(κmax/Reff), yielding the order-tight O(cbκmax/R) under balance (typically cb=O(logR)). As an impossibility screen, under standard finite-moment conditions for sample kurtosis estimation, surpassing the O(1/T) estimation scale requires R≲κmaxT. We also show that purification -- selecting m≪R sign-consistent sources -- restores R-independent contrast Ω(1/m), with a simple data-driven heuristic. Synthetic experiments validate the predicted decay, the T crossover, and contrast recovery.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: Empirical validation (mean ± SEM). (a) FastICA error err(W,A) increases with 1/Δκ ( R2=0.78 ). (b) Balanced Student- t mixtures (df =8 , κ0=1.5 ) show ∣κ^(y)∣∝1/R for R=2,…,50 ( R2=0.986 ); unbalanced power-law weights decay more slowly. Inset at R=50 : std(κ^)∼σ0/T ( σ0≈5.3 ); dotted line: ∣κ0∣/R . (c) At R=50 (df ∈[6,30] ), purification ( m=5 ) increases contrast from ≈0.03 to ≈0.43 (oracle) / ≈0.44 (sample-based), ∼14× .
Fig. 2: Paired kurtosis-gap comparison in COBRE group ICA ( n=155 ) for model orders k=53 and k=100 , with FNC insets. Top: two-level FNC summaries (edge-level S and fingerprint-level F ). Bottom: example connectivity fingerprint ( ∣z∣ ) and one representative subject’s static FNC matrix for component k∗=51 in the k=53 solution (with ∣z∣ clipped at the 98th percentile for visualization). FNC insets are qualitative context only and are not used in the redundancy-law inference.
Methods Center, University of Tübingen · Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Tübingen · Institute of Artificial Intelligence, TU Braunschweig