Organizations: School of Computer Science and Technology, Tongji University · School of Artificial Intelligence, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen · Department of Language Science and Technology, Hong Kong Polytechnic University · Artificial Intelligence Research Institute, Shenzhen University of Advanced Technology · School of Data Science, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen
Achieving human-like responsiveness is a critical yet challenging goal for cascaded spoken dialogue systems. Conventional ASR-LLM-TTS pipelines follow a strictly sequential paradigm, requiring complete transcription and full reasoning before speech synthesis can begin, which results in high response latency. We propose the Discourse-Aware Dual-Track Streaming Response (DDTSR) framework, a low-latency architecture that enables listen-while-thinking and speak-while-thinking. DDTSR is built upon three key mechanisms: (1) connective-guided small-large model synergy, where an auxiliary small model generates minimal-committal discourse connectives while a large model performs knowledge-intensive reasoning in parallel; (2) streaming-based cross-modal collaboration, which dynamically overlaps ASR, LLM inference, and TTS to advance the earliest speakable moment; and (3) curriculum-learning-based discourse continuity enhancement, which maintains coherence and logical consistency between early responses and subsequent reasoning outputs. Experiments on two spoken dialogue benchmarks demonstrate that DDTSR reduces response latency by 19%-51% while preserving discourse quality. Further analysis shows that DDTSR functions as a plug-and-play module compatible with diverse LLM backbones, and remains robust across varying utterance lengths, indicating strong practicality and scalability for real-time spoken interaction.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Necessity of low-latency spoken interaction. Humans naturally exhibit speaking while thinking behavior, whereas conventional systems wait for full response completion before speaking.
Figure 2: The Framework of Discourse-Aware Dual-Track Streaming Response.
Dataset
Subset
# Samples
SD-Eval
test-acc
445
test-age
507
test-env
284
Total
1,236
SpokenNativQA
en
2,322
Total
3,558
Table 1: Dataset statistics of SD-Eval and SpokenNativQA.
Dataset
Strategy
Large Model
Latency (ms)
Perception
Reaction
Waiting
Opt.
Rem.
Avg.
Opt.
Rem.
Avg.
Opt.
Rem.
Avg.
SD-Eval
SSC
8B
-
-
388
-
-
615
-
-
1003
SDC
363
438
391
416
559
470
779
997
861
DDTSR
90
327
113
428
528
435
515
855
548
SSC
32B
-
-
388
-
-
736
-
-
1124
Table 2: External latency breakdown across datasets and strategies (reported in milliseconds). SSC, SDC, and DDTSR are evaluated under both 8B and 32B model scales, while GLM-realtime and Doubao-realtime are model-agnostic. Opt. and Rem. report the average audio latency with and without connective generation, respectively.
Figure 3: Latency analysis on SD-Eval with respect to input audio length.
Dataset
Strategy
Model
Text Level
Speech Level
Cons. / Cohe.
UTMOSv2
SD-Eval
Gold Standard
–
4.77 / 4.43
–
SSC
8B
4.76 / 4.54
3.16
SDC
4.77 / 4.46
3.20
DDTSR
4.77 / 4.49
3.12
SSC
32B
4.94 / 4.71
3.09
Table 3: Text- and speech-level quality comparison across different strategies on SD-Eval and SpokenNativQA. Text quality is reported as Consistency/Coherence (“Cons./Cohe.”) via an LLM-as-a-judge protocol, and speech quality by UTMOSv2. Gold Standard refers to the ground-truth QA pairs.
Appendix figures & tables4 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Fraser’s Category
Subtype
Connective Examples
Function in Turn Transition
Discourse Markers (DMs)
Contrastive (CDM)
but, however, nevertheless
Speaker B introduces a contrast, objection, or exception to A’s utterance.
Elaborative (EDM)
and, moreover, besides
Speaker B adds information or provides elaboration related to A’s utterance.
Inferential (IDM)
so, therefore, thus
Speaker B derives a conclusion or consequence based on A’s utterance.
Discourse Structure Markers (DSMs)
Topic-Orienting (TOM)
by the way, speaking of which
Speaker B introduces a related subtopic, managing topic transitions.
Discourse-Managing (DMM)
first, in summary, in other words
Speaker B comments on or organizes the structure of upcoming discourse.
Attention-Managing (AM)
look, listen, hey
Speaker B directs or secures the attention of A before proceeding.
Appendix
Table 4: Turn-transition connective types adapted from Fraser’s discourse marker classification system. Connectives occur at the beginning of Speaker B’s turn and do not contribute to truth conditions.
Figure 4: LLM prompt format for turn-transition connective generation.
Dataset
#Samp.
#Conn.
#Types
Entropy
SD-Eval
1236
1125
240
0.75
SpokenNativQA
2322
1055
146
0.65
Appendix
Table 5: Statistics of the constructed connective datasets. #Samp.: total number of samples; #Conn.: number of samples containing connectives; #Types: number of distinct connective types; Entropy: the normalized entropy of connective label distribution (higher value indicates more uniform label usage).
Component
Role
Model
Deployment
LLM
Connective (connective)
Qwen3-0.6B (fine-tuned)
Local
Main content (reasoning)
Qwen3-8B
Remote
Qwen3-32B
Streaming ASR
Incremental transcription
sherpa-onnx-streaming-zipformer-en-2023-06-26
Local
Streaming TTS
Incremental synthesis
CosyVoice2
Local
Appendix
Table 6: System configuration and deployment setup.