cs.LGFeb 26, 2026

Long Range Frequency Tuning for QML

Authors: Michael Poppel, Markus Baumann, Sebastian Wölckert, Claudia Linnhoff-Popien, Jonas Stein

Organizations: LMU Munich & Aqarios GmbH, Munich, Germany · LMU Munich, Munich, Germany

Abstract

Angle-encoded variational quantum circuits admit a truncated Fourier series representation of their output, but approximating functions with maximum frequency ωmax⁡ω_{\max} using fixed unary encoding requires O(ωmax⁡)\mathcal{O}(ω_{\max}) encoding gates. Trainable-frequency (TF) circuits promise a reduction by learning the data-encoding prefactors alongside the ansatz parameters, adapting the accessible frequency spectrum to the target during training. We identify a practical barrier that prevents this promise from being realized: the prefactor gradient is suppressed by the spectral gap between the circuit's accessible frequencies and the target spectrum, independently of the ansatz parameters, confining gradient-driven prefactor movement to a narrow neighborhood of initialization. We propose ternary grid initialization -- setting prefactors to {1,3,9,…,3k−1}\{1, 3, 9, \ldots, 3^{k-1}\} -- which ensures every target frequency within [−ωmax⁡,ωmax⁡][-ω_{\max}, ω_{\max}] lies within 12\tfrac{1}{2} unit of the accessible spectrum at initialization, so that the spectral-gap bound no longer constrains the target-driven gradient to be small. This is a necessary condition for reliable convergence, whose sufficiency we establish empirically. On a synthetic benchmark with target frequencies shifted well beyond the standard initialization range, ternary initialization achieves median R2=0.997R^2 = 0.997 versus 0.180.18 for unary initialization, with 100%100\% of runs achieving R2>0.95R^2 > 0.95 against 0%0\%. CMA-ES with 20×20\times the evaluation budget reaches only 25%25\% success, confirming the limitation is a property of the optimization landscape rather than of gradient-based optimization specifically. Real-world validation on two benchmark datasets demonstrates consistent advantages over both fixed and trainable unary baselines.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables5 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. Architecture Shape Governs QNN Trainability: Jacobian Null Space Growth and Parameter Efficiency

    May 7, 2026Michael Poppel, David Bucher, Maximilian Zorn +5Variational Quantum CircuitsQuantum Circuit Trainability

  2. Stacking the Deck: Tunable Trainability in Stacked LCUs

    Jul 27, 2026Nikhil Khatri, Stefan Zohren, Gabriel MatosBarren PlateausQuantum Circuit Simulation