Diffusion Probe: Generated Image Result Prediction Using CNN Probes

Recent text-to-image (T2I) diffusion and flow-matching models can produce highly realistic images from natural language prompts. In practical scenarios, T2I systems are often run in a ``generate--then--select'' mode: many seeds are sampled and only a few images are kept for use. However, this pipeline is highly resource-intensive since each candidate requires tens to hundreds of denoising steps, and evaluation metrics such as CLIPScore and ImageReward are post-hoc. In this work, we address this inefficiency by introducing Probe-Select, a plug-in module that enables efficient evaluation of image quality within the generation process. We observe that certain intermediate denoiser activations, even at early timesteps, encode a stable coarse structure, object layout and spatial arrangement--that strongly correlates with final image fidelity. Probe-Select exploits this property by predicting final quality scores directly from early activations, allowing unpromising seeds to be terminated early. Across diffusion and flow-matching backbones, our experiments show that early evaluation at only 20% of the trajectory accurately ranks candidate seeds and enables selective continuation. This strategy reduces sampling cost by over 60% while improving the quality of the retained images, demonstrating that early structural signals can effectively guide selective generation without altering the underlying generative model. Code is available at https://github.com/Guhuary/ProbeSelect.

Text-to-Image (T2I) generation is primarily driven by Diffusion Models (DM) which rely on random Gaussian noise. Thus, like playing the slots at a casino, a DM will produce different results given the same user-defined inputs. This imposes a gambler's burden: To perform multiple generation cycles to obtain a satisfactory result. However, even though DMs use stochastic sampling to seed generation, the distribution of generated content quality highly depends on the prompt and the generative ability of a DM with respect to it. To account for this, we propose Naïve PAINE for improving the generative quality of Diffusion Models by leveraging T2I preference benchmarks. We directly predict the numerical quality of an image from the initial noise and given prompt. Naïve PAINE then selects a handful of quality noises and forwards them to the DM for generation. Further, Naïve PAINE provides feedback on the DM generative quality given the prompt and is lightweight enough to seamlessly fit into existing DM pipelines. Experimental results demonstrate that Naïve PAINE outperforms existing approaches on several prompt corpus benchmarks.

Recent advances in text-to-image (T2I) generation have led to models capable of producing highly realistic images. Yet, reliably evaluating their outputs remains challenging, especially at scale. Existing automatic evaluators, often relying on a static prompt set, struggle to capture subtle failure modes such as partial prompt misalignment, compositional errors, or visually plausible but semantically incorrect generations. In this work, we introduce DynEval, a Dynamic Evaluation framework designed to jointly assess text-to-image alignment and image quality of T2I models. To support scalable training beyond limited human-annotated data, we construct two large datasets. First, we build GenDB, a collection of 500K prompt-image pairs generated from human-written prompts drawn from DiffusionDB using a tiered prompt-model generation strategy. Second, building upon GenDB, we construct DynEvalInstruct, a 250K instruction dataset comprising prompt-image-response triplets distilled from a structured evaluation pipeline that decomposes evaluation into text-image alignment and visual quality reasoning. Using this dataset, we perform full fine-tuning of a compact evaluator through a curriculum learning strategy to effectively distill the superior evaluation capabilities of a larger teacher vision-language model, resulting in DynEval-2B and DynEval-4B. In extensive comparisons against existing evaluators across 11 benchmarks, our evaluator achieves a higher overall correlation with human judgments. Furthermore, it provides fine-grained analysis of the capabilities and failure modes of 36 T2I models across 42 subcategories and 9 semantic dimensions.