This paper introduces a dataset of enriched geographic coordinates retrieved from Diderot and d'Alembert's eighteenth-century Encyclopedie. Automatically recovering geographic coordinates from historical texts is a complex task, as they are expressed in a variety of ways and with varying levels of precision. To improve retrieval of coordinates from similar digitized early modern texts, we have created a gold standard dataset, trained models, published the resulting inferred and normalized coordinate data, and experimented applying these models to new texts. From 74,000 total articles in each of the digitized versions of the Encyclopedie from ARTFL and ENCCRE, we examined 15,278 geographical entries, manually identifying 4,798 containing coordinates, and 10,480 with descriptive but non-numerical references. Leveraging our gold standard annotations, we trained transformer-based models to retrieve and normalize coordinates. The pipeline presented here combines a classifier to identify coordinate-bearing entries and a second model for retrieval, tested across encoder-decoder and decoder architectures. Cross-validation yielded an 86% EM score. On an out-of-domain eighteenth-century Trevoux dictionary (also in French), our fine-tuned model had a 61% EM score, while for the nineteenth-century, 7th edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica in English, the EM was 77%. These findings highlight the gold standard dataset's usefulness as training data, and our two-step method's cross-lingual, cross-domain generalizability.
Figures & tables
Type
Headword
Coordinates
Point
AAHUS
[["52 10’ N 24 36’ E"]]
Point
AGRIGNON
[["19 40’ N"]]
Rectangle
ABISSINIE
[[’6 N 48 E’, ’20 N 65 E’]]
Rectangle
FALSTER
[["55 50’ N 28 50’ E", "56 50’ N 29 26’ E"]]
Polygonal chain
AMUR ou AMOER
[[’pchain’], [’117 E’], [’55 N 152 E’]]
Subentries
AVA
[[’subart’], [’21 N 114 E’], ["33 N 151 10’ E"], ["35 20’ N 159 E"]]
Table 1: Annotation examples for points, rectangles, polygonal chains, and sequences.
Category
Count
Simple types
Well-formed points
4,287
Incomplete points
232
- Latitude only
221
- Longitude only
11
Surfaces
133
Polygonal chains
11
Table 2: Dataset statistics.
Long_D
Long_DM
Long_DMS
Lat_D
116
182
2
Lat_DM
278
3,356
91
Lat_DMS
3
38
221
Table 3: Coordinate precision distribution for single well-formed points.
Figure 1: Map showing the location of dataset coordinates colored by their level of precision. Red points contain only degrees (D), light blue contain degrees and minutes (DM), and dark blue points contain degrees, minutes, and seconds (DMS).
EM
CER
Support
mt5-small
0.86
0.07
959
gpt5-mini
0.86
0.03
points
mt5-small
0.92
0.01
903
only
gpt5-mini
0.90
0.01
others
mt5-small
0.00
0.57
56
only
gpt5-mini
0.29
0.22
Table 4: Coordinate retrieval and DMS normalization model performance.
D
DM
DMS
mt5
gpt
mt5
gpt
mt5
gpt
D
0.81
0.81
0.84
0.77
-
-
DM
0.92
0.87
0.98
0.91
0.5
0.83
DMS
0.0
0.0
0.85
0.85
0.56
0.91
Table 5: Exact match (EM) evaluation scores for coordinate retrieval, comparing MT5 and GPT model performance for coordinate precision levels. Rows represent latitude precision level. Columns represent longitude precision level.
Department of Data Analysis and Programming Technologies Institute of Computational Mathematics and Information Technologies Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University Kazan, Russia