MSVBench: Towards Human-Level Evaluation of Multi-Shot Video Generation
Organizations: Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen) · Alibaba International Digital Commerce
Abstract
The evolution of video generation toward complex, multi-shot narratives has exposed a critical deficit in current evaluation methods. Existing benchmarks remain anchored to single-shot paradigms, lacking the comprehensive story assets and cross-shot metrics required to assess long-form coherence and appeal. To bridge this gap, we introduce MSVBench, the first comprehensive benchmark featuring hierarchical scripts and reference images tailored for Multi-Shot Video generation. We propose a hybrid evaluation framework that synergizes the high-level semantic reasoning of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) with the fine-grained perceptual rigor of domain-specific expert models. Evaluating 20 video generation methods across diverse paradigms, we find that current models--despite strong visual fidelity--primarily behave as visual interpolators rather than true world models. We further validate the reliability of our benchmark by demonstrating a state-of-the-art Spearman's rank correlation of 94.4% with human judgments. Finally, MSVBench extends beyond evaluation by providing a scalable supervisory signal. Fine-tuning a lightweight model on its pipeline-refined reasoning traces yields human-aligned performance comparable to commercial models like Gemini-2.5-Flash.
Figures & tables
| Benchmark | Ref(C/S) | Aspects | Evaluator | H-Align | Metrics | Methods |
| VBench Huang et al. (2024) | -/- | VQ/PVA/VC/MQ | Spec. | Yes | 16 | 9 |
| EvalCrafter Liu et al. (2024b) | -/- | VQ/PVA/VC/MQ | Spec. | Yes | 16 | 8 |
| Video-Bench Han et al. (2025) | -/- | VQ/PVA/VC/MQ | LLM | Yes | 9 | 7 |
| OpenS2V-Nexus Yuan et al. (2025) | 479/- | VQ/PVA/VC/MQ | LMM/Spec. | No | 19 | 8 |
| ViStoryBench Zhuang et al. (2025) | 509 /- | VQ/SVA/VC | LMM/Spec. | Partial | 12 | 18 |
| MSVBench | 136/ 276 | VQ/SVA/VC/MQ | LMM+Spec. | Yes | 20 | 20 |
| Dimension | Metric | Underlying Models |
| Visual Quality | Dover Score | DOVER (VQA_A, VQA_T) |
| MusIQ Score | MusIQ | |
| Visual Attr. Consist. | - | |
| Style Consist. | CSD-ViT-L | |
| Story Video Alignment | VQAScore | CLIP-FlanT5-XXL (VQAScore) |
| Detect & Count Score | Gemini-2.5-Flash |
| Visual Quality | Story Video Alignment | Video Consistency | Motion Quality | ||||||||||||||||
| Model | Dov. | Mus. | V.A.C | S.C. | VQA | Det. | S.P.A | S.S.P | S.V.C | Fac. | Cha. | Bac. | Clo. | Siz. | A.R. | A.S. | Cam. | Phy.P | Phy.I |
| Storyboard-Driven Synthesis | |||||||||||||||||||
| AniSora3.2 | 0.68 | 0.21 | 81.50 | 0.96 | 81.72 | 83.02 | 4.20 | 3.93 | 81.41 | 87.05 | 85.38 | 0.53 | 3.63 | 0.98 | 23.57 | 17.41 | 3.57 | 3.41 | 2.41 |
| CogVideoX1.5-5B-I2V | 0.67 | 0.19 | 74.21 | 0.95 | 82.64 | 86.01 | 4.19 | 4.05 | 81.20 | 87.73 | 86.03 | 0.52 | 3.63 | 0.98 | 23.16 | 16.00 | 3.45 | 3.14 | 2.29 |
| HunyuanVideo-I2V | 0.58 | 0.20 | 74.86 | 0.95 | 81.30 | 77.77 | 4.13 | 3.72 | 81.34 | 89.14 | 86.08 | 0.52 | 3.36 | 0.99 | 24.90 | 31.44 | 3.58 | 3.11 | 2.43 |
| LTXV-13B-0.9.8 | 0.67 | 0.19 | 74.97 | 0.94 | 81.87 | 76.93 | 4.07 | 3.83 | 81.69 | 88.25 | 86.12 | 0.55 | 3.61 | 0.99 | 24.84 | 35.22 | 3.52 | 2.76 | 2.34 |
| Model | V.Q. | S.V.A. | V.C. | M.Q. | Avg. |
| Veo3.1 | 4.29 | 4.51 | 3.68 | 3.97 | 4.11 |
| Sora2 | 4.22 | 4.45 | 3.56 | 4.01 | 4.06 |
| Anisora3.2 | 3.98 | 3.40 | 3.03 | 3.32 | 3.43 |
| Wan2.2-I2V | 3.70 | 3.48 | 2.86 | 3.40 | 3.36 |
| LTXV-13B-0.9.8 | 3.90 | 3.27 | 3.06 | 3.22 | 3.36 |
| AniMaker | 3.04 | 3.42 | 3.14 | 3.08 | 3.17 |
| Aspects | Methods | Spearman’s | Kendall’s |
| (%) | (%) | ||
| Visual Quality | Aesthetic-Quality (VBench) | 47.0 | 39.5 |
| Imaging-Quality (VBench) | 35.1 | 27.8 | |
| ViStoryBench | 27.2 | 15.4 | |
| MSVBench (Ours) | 60.4 | 47.9 | |
| Video Story Alignment | Clip-Score (EvalCrafter) | 42.5 | 35.2 |
| Model | Overall Correlation (%) | |
| Spearman’s | Kendall’s | |
| Commercial Models | ||
| Gemini-2.5-Flash | 79.2 | 62.8 |
| Gemini-2.5-Pro | 85.7 | 70.2 |
| Ours (Lightweight) | ||
| Qwen3-VL-4B (Base) | 79.9 | 59.6 |
Appendix figures & tables20 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| Rank | Model | Overall Ranking ↓ |
| 1 | Veo3.1 | |
| 2 | Sora2 | |
| 3 | Wan2.2 - TI2V | |
| 4 | Anisora3.2 | |
| 5 | AniMaker | |
| 6 | Wan2.2 - T2V |
Video Generation Evaluation
Video generation evaluation measures visual quality, prompt adherence, temporal consistency, physical plausibility, and task-specific behavior in synthesized videos.
See all 183 papers