Safe Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for Privacy-Aware Edge-Device Collaborative DNN Inference
Organizations: School of Future Science and Engineering, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China · College of Computer and Information Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China · School of Information and Control Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China · Department of Control Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China ·
Abstract
As Deep Neural Network (DNN) inference becomes increasingly prevalent on edge and mobile platforms, critical challenges emerge in privacy protection, resource constraints, and dynamic model deployment. This paper proposes a privacy-aware collaborative inference framework, in which adaptive model partitioning is performed across edge devices and servers. To jointly optimize inference delay, energy consumption, and privacy cost under dynamic service demands and resource constraints, we formulate the joint problem as a Constrained Markov Decision Process (CMDP) that integrates model deployment, user-server association, model partitioning, and resource allocation. We propose a Hierarchical Constrained Multi-Agent Proximal Policy Optimization with Lagrangian relaxation (HC-MAPPO-L) algorithm, a safe reinforcement learning-based framework that enhances Multi-Agent Proximal Policy Optimization (MAPPO) with adaptive Lagrangian dual updates to enforce long-term delay constraints. To ensure tractability while maintaining coordination, we decompose the CMDP into three hierarchically structured policy layers: an auto-regressive based model deployment policy, a Lagrangian-enhanced user association and model partitioning policy, and an attention-based resource allocation policy. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that HC-MAPPO-L consistently satisfies stringent delay constraints while achieving a superior balance among energy consumption and privacy cost, outperforming representative baseline algorithms across varying problem scales and resource configurations.
Figures & tables
| Parameter | Value |
| User compute capacity ( ) | 10–100 GFLOPS (Uniform) |
| Edge compute capacity ( ) | 500–2000 GFLOPS (Uniform) |
| User storage capacity | 1–2 GB (Uniform) |
| Edge storage capacity | 3–5 GB (Uniform) |
| Per-server bandwidth | 50–100 MHz (Uniform) |
| Server / User TX power | 30–43 / 20–30 dBm |