GLIDE-Reg: Global-to-Local Deformable Registration Using Co-Optimized Foundation and Handcrafted Features
Authors: Yunzheng Zhu, Aichi Chien, Kimaya kulkarni, Luoting Zhuang, Stephen Park, Ricky Savjani, Daniel Low, William Hsu
Organizations: Medical & Imaging Informatics, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, USA · Magnetic Resonance Research Labs, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, USA · Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, USA
Deformable registration is crucial in medical imaging. Several existing applications include lesion tracking, probabilistic atlas generation, and treatment response evaluation. However, current methods often lack robustness and generalizability across two key factors: spatial resolution and differences in anatomical coverage. We jointly optimize a registration field and a learnable dimensionality reduction module so that compressed VFM embeddings remain registration-relevant, and fuse these global semantic cues with MIND local descriptors. GLIDE-Reg achieves average dice similarity coefficients (DSC) across 6 anatomical structures of 0.859, 0.862, and 0.901 in two public cohorts (Lung250M and NLST) and one institution cohort (UCLA5DCT), and outperforms the state-of-the-art DEEDS (0.834, 0.858, 0.900) with relative improvements of 3.0%, 0.5%, and 0.1%. For target registration errors, GLIDE-Reg achieves 1.58 mm on Lung250M landmarks (compared to 1.25 mm on corrField and 1.91 mm on DEEDS) and 1.11 mm on NLST nodule centers (compared to 1.11 mm on DEEDS). The substantiated performance on the nodule centers also demonstrates its robustness across challenging downstream tasks, such as nodule tracking, which is an essential prior step for early-stage lung cancer diagnosis.
Figures & tables
Dataset
NLST
Lung250M
UCLA5DCT
Study Disease
Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodule
COPD
N/A
Study Age
55 to 74
48 to 80
N/A
Collection Date
1999 to 2001
After 2007 (Phase I or II)
N/A
Task (Time Diff.)
Longitudinal ( 1 to 2 years)
Insp. Exp. ( ∼30 mins)
Free-Breathing ( <5 mins)
Data Type
Low-Dose CT
Breath-Hold CT
Free-Breath CT
Resolution
512×512×[67,196]
512×512×[112,135]
500×500×[342,411]
Table 1: Specifications of Datasets used for this study.
Figure 1: GLIDE-Reg Pipeline. A pair of 3D images Ifix and Imov are passed to a global feature extractor and a local feature extractor (MIND) for extracting the optimal global feature representations GFfix∗ , GFmov∗ and local feature representations LFfix , LFmov , respectively. Then the features are registered with 1) feature-independent coupled convex optimization and 2) fused Adam optimization in Local-Global Registration and output the Iwarp . DR stands for dimensionality reduction.
Lung250M
NLST
[blinded]5DCT
Method
TRE ↓
DSC ↑
%∣J∣<0↓
Runtime
TRE ↓
DSC ↑
%∣J∣<0↓
Runtime
DSC ↑
%∣J∣<0↓
Landmarks
Mean6
Nodule
Mean6
Mean6
No Reg.
16.25±3.84 *
0.517±0.080 *
−
−
18.93±10.27 *
0.472±0.100 *
−
−
0.767±0.049 *
−
Affine
30.36±12.12 *
0.488±0.106 *
−
<5 sec
30.36±23.88 *
0.726±0.045 *
−
<10 sec
0.751±0.050 *
−
SyN [ 1 ]
13.95±3.63 *
0.634±0.085 *
0.0
<1 min
17.65±10.24 *
0.534±0.125 *
<0.001
<2 min
0.838±0.036 *
<0.001
NiftyReg [ 21 ]
14.15±3.93 *
0.563±0.086 *
0.565±0.006
<2.5 min
26.93±14.25 *
0.396±0.088 *
1.846±1.992
<4 min
0.807±0.032 *
0.010±0.013
Table 2: Comparison of registration performance on three datasets evaluated by DSC( ↑ ) and TRE( ↓ ) (in mm ), and nonpositive Jacobian determinant %∣J∣<0 ( ↓ ). No Reg. represents the baseline performance for the image pairs. Methods with top two performance for TRE and DSC in each column are bolded and underlined , respectively. Statistical testings are computed per pair on the TRE and average DSC using Wilcoxon signed-rank test and adjusted by Benjamini-Hochberg correction with false discovery rate of 0.05 . Methods that are outperformed by or outperform GLIDE-Reg with statistical significance ( p<0.05 ) are marked with ∗ and †, respectively.
Figure 2: Comparison of the best performing 9 algorithms (best four in the learning-based and all five feature-based instance-optimization algorithms) on the NLST dataset.
Figure 3: Comparison of the feature-based instance-optimization methods on one challenging case from Lung250M, where all learning-based methods failed.
Deep learning registration methods routinely stack two kinds of enhancement on a base network: architectural additions such as affine pre-alignment stages, and training-objective additions such as regularization losses. Papers tend to adopt both at once, so it is unclear which is doing the work. I ran a controlled ablation to separate them. Using the OASIS brain MRI dataset (394 training subjects, 20 test subjects), I trained four variants of the same registration pipeline: a baseline 3D U-Net with basic similarity losses, the same U-Net with a full regularization suite, an affine-plus-deformable architecture with basic losses, and the affine architecture with the full suite. I evaluated registration accuracy (MSE, NCC, SSIM), deformation quality (Jacobian determinant preservation, displacement statistics, an anatomical plausibility score), and computational cost. Regularization alone accounted for most of the gain: a 21.3% relative gain on the MSE-improvement metric (1.78% to 2.16%, P<.001) and a 21.8% relative gain in NCC improvement, while cutting maximum deformation from 53.1 to 0.51 units, a 99.0% reduction, at essentially no computational cost (-0.06% inference time). The combined model produced the largest accuracy gain, 25.8% (1.78% to 2.24%), and raised anatomical plausibility from 0.596 to 0.930, at a moderate +9.8% inference-time cost. Gradient correlation rose from 0.742 at baseline to 0.980 for the fully enhanced model. All enhanced variants reached sub-voxel accuracy under plausible deformation constraints. Regularization losses are the primary driver in this setting, delivering the accuracy gains and almost all of the deformation control for free at inference time, while the affine architecture adds a smaller complementary benefit at acceptable cost. The 99% reduction in unrealistic deformations addresses a known barrier to clinical deployment.
Nabira Rashid
Carnegie Mellon University · Harvard Medical School
Multi-modal image registration plays a critical role in precision medicine but faces challenges from non-linear intensity relationships and local optima. While deep learning models enable rapid inference, they often suffer from generalization collapse on unseen modalities. To address this, we propose Search-MIND, a training-free, iterative optimization framework for instance-specific registration. Our pipeline utilizes a coarse-to-fine strategy: a hierarchical coarse alignment stage followed by deformable refinement. We introduce two novel loss functions: Variance-Weighted Mutual Information (VWMI), which prioritizes informative tissue regions to shield global alignment from background noise and uniform regions, and Search-MIND (S-MIND), which broadens the convergence basin of structural descriptors by considering larger local search range. Evaluations on CARE Liver 2025 and CHAOS Challenge datasets show that Search-MIND consistently outperforms classical baselines like ANTs and foundation model-based approaches like DINO-reg, offering superior stability across diverse modalities.
Boya Wang, Ruizhe Li, Chao Chen +1
Intelligent Modelling & Analysis Group (IMA), School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, UK · Lab for Uncertainty in Data and Decision Making (LUCID), Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK
Deformable image registration (DIR) is a core problem in medical image analysis; but, unlike labeling decision problems such as classification and segmentation, registration is a problem class that involves stringent physical constraints. Although deep learning methods have made faster registration possible, the resulting models are often difficult to interpret compared to hand-crafted methods with explicit objectives and interpretable physical meaning. In this work, we show that an analytical method can still yield competitive and superior results to deep learning in a common deformable registration task. We study pTVreg as a parametric total variation based registration in that context. Observing its different implementations to perform at various degrees, we introduce here an accessible implementation of this method, together with a Bayesian optimization framework that automatically sets self-parameters for any DIR task from a set of sample examples. Experiments on Lung250M-4B show that our proposed implementation achieves state-of-the-art results in this benchmark, substantially superior to existing deep learning solutions and other pTVreg variants as baselines. The source code will be made publicly available at https://github.com/oazeybekoglu/ptvreg-python .
Onur Ali Zeybekoglu, David Tilly, Orcun Goksel
Department of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden · Department of Medical Physics, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden · Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden