Organizations: Institute of Digital Twin, Eastern Institute of Technology, Ningbo · Ningbo Key Laboratory of Spatial Intelligence and Digital Derivative · Shanghai Jiao Tong University · The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) project visual tokens into the embedding space of language models, yet the internal structuring and processing of visual semantics remain poorly understood. In this work, we introduce a two-fold analytical framework featuring a novel probing tool, EmbedLens, to conduct a fine-grained analysis. We uncover a pronounced semantic sparsity at the input level: visual tokens consistently partition into sink, dead, and alive categories. Remarkably, only the alive tokens, comprising ≈60% of the total input, carry image-specific meaning. Furthermore, using a targeted patch-compression benchmark, we demonstrate that these alive tokens already encode rich, fine-grained cues (e.g., objects, colors, and OCR) prior to entering the LLM. Internal visual computations (such as visual attention and feed-forward networks) are redundant for most standard tasks. For the small subset of highly vision-centric tasks that actually benefit from internal processing, we reveal that alive tokens naturally align with intermediate LLM layers rather than the initial embedding space, indicating that shallow-layer processing is unnecessary and that direct mid-layer injection is both sufficient. Ultimately, our findings provide a unified mechanistic view of visual token processing, paving the way for more efficient and interpretable MLLM architectures through selective token pruning, minimized visual computation, and mid-layer injection. The code is released at: https://github.com/EIT-NLP/EmbedLens.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Cluster dominance and Cross-image stability in post-projection visual embeddings . (Left) Cluster similarity cross images. (Right) Number of tokens in the top-5 clusters. The cluster index is ranked by the number of tokens.
Figure 2: ( Left ) The t-SNE visualization of visual and textual clusters in word embedding space. ( Right ) An example illustrating the multi-semantic properties of a token within the green-marked text-proximity cluster shown in the left figure.
Figure 3: Comparison between EmbedLens and LogitLens in label–token matching accuracy. EmbedLens achieves higher semantic recall at shallow and middle layers across multiple MLLMs, suggesting that visual embeddings already encode object-level semantics prior to LLM fusion .
Figure 4: Formation (Main) and persistence (Insets) of LLM sink tokens. (Left) Cosine similarity between ⟨bos⟩ , ViT sinks, and LLM sinks across sublayers. (Right) Layer-wise tracking of the top-5 most similar tokens to ⟨bos⟩ .
Method
General
OCR
CV Centric
Hallu.
Avg.
LLaVA-v1.5 7B
58.7
36.9
54.0
61.1
52.7
Sinks Pruning
−ISLLM
58.6
37.0
54.4
61.3
52.7
−ISViT
58.7
37.2
53.8
61.1
52.8
−IS
58.6
37.2
54.1
61.3
52.8
Sublayer Skipping
Table 1: Impact of sink pruning and sublayer skipping on downstream performance. 2 2 2 The General VQA score averages results from GQA [ 17 ] , MME [ 12 ] , MMBench deven [ 32 ] , and MMStar [ 6 ] . OCR performance averages TextVQA val [ 44 ] , OCRBench [ 33 ] , and DocVQA [ 36 ] . The CV-centric ability is measured by RefCOCO+ REC val, and RefCOCO REC testA/B [ 22 ] . Hallucination is evaluated using POPE [ 24 ] and HallusionBench [ 14 ] . See the appendix for detailed setups. “ ∈/ISLLM –FF 2 ” denotes skipping MLP-2 for all non-sink visual tokens.
Method
General
OCR
CV centric
Hallu.
Avg.
LLaVA-v1.5 7B
58.7
36.9
54.0
61.1
52.7
-Dead
58.7
37.1
57.7
61.2
53.7
-Remaining
57.2
34.3
48.5
60.2
50.1
Table 2: Effect of pruning dead-token clusters. -Dead removes all dead tokens. -Remaining randomly removes the same number of dead tokens sampled from the remaining tokens.
Figure 5: Dead tokens exhibit minimal representation change and receive limited cross-modal attention. Left: Layer-wise cosine similarity within each cluster, showing that dead tokens remain highly self-consistent while other tokens evolve substantially. Right: Text-to-visual attention distribution across clusters. Inset: Token-averaged attention comparison.
Figure 6: Emergence and persistence of dead tokens. ( Left ) Average L1 norm across ViT layers. ( Right ) Layer-to-layer cosine similarity in CLIP. ( Bottom ) Average entropy of cluster semantics at the last layer of LLMs.
Figure 7: Semantic sparsity of visual tokens across layers.
Figure 8: Layer-wise alignment dynamics and effect of norm scaling.
Figure 9: Results on our multi-trajectory benchmark.
Method
General
OCR
CV Centric
Hallu.
Avg.
LLaVA-v1.5 7B
58.7
36.9
54.0
61.1
52.7
Layer Decoupling
−vMHA†
58.7
35.4
37.2
62.0
48.3
−vFFN†
57.8
35.4
50.6
61.7
51.4
Shallow Layers Skipping
Lin=4†
58.7
36.6
56.4
61.2
53.2
Table 3: Effect of layer decoupling and shallow-layer skipping on multimodal reasoning. † denotes training-based method.
Method
General
OCR
CV Centric
Hallucination
Avg.
GQA
MME P
MMStar
MMBench
VQA text
OCRbench
VQA Doc
RefCOCO+ val
RefCOCO testA
RefCOCO testB
POPE
Hallusion
Avg.
LLaVA-v1.5 7B
61.9
1507
33.5
64.1
58.2
31.2
21.5
50.0
64.5
47.4
85.9
36.2
52.7
Sinks Pruning
−ViT Sinks
61.9
1502
33.2
64.5
58.2
31.5
21.9
50.4
65.1
47.6
85.9
36.3
52.8
−LLM Sinks
62.0
1488
33.5
63.8
58.2
31.3
21.5
50.1
64.2
47.0
85.9
36.6
52.7
−All Sinks
62.0
1499
33.1
64.3
58.2
31.4
21.9
50.5
64.5
47.4
85.9
36.6
52.8
Table a : Effect of sink pruning and sublayer skipping. Performance remains stable under pruning or skipping operations, indicating weak reliance on visual sink tokens. ∈/ISLLM –MLP2 skips MLP-2 only for non-sink visual tokens.
Method
General
OCR
CV Centric
Hallucination
Avg.
GQA
MME P
MMStar
MMBench
VQA text
OCRbench
VQA Doc
RefCOCO+ val
RefCOCO testA
RefCOCO testB
POPE
Hallusion
Avg.
LLaVA-v1.5 7B
61.9
1507
33.5
64.1
58.2
31.2
21.5
50.0
64.5
47.4
85.9
36.2
52.7
-Dead Tokens
61.8
1495
34
64.1
58.2
31.6
21.6
53.4
68.4
51.4
86
36.3
53.7
-Alive Tokens
60.5
1475
32.2
62.5
55.4
29
18.6
44.4
58.3
42.9
84.2
36.2
50.1
Table b : Effect of pruning dead-token clusters. Pruning dead-token clusters yields a small boost in accuracy, whereas removing the same number of remaining visual tokens causes substantial drops across all benchmarks. This validates that dead tokens are semantically void and redundant, while non-dead tokens carry meaningful information.
Method
General
OCR
CV Centric
Hallucination
Avg.
GQA
MME P
MMStar
MMBench
VQA text
OCRbench
VQA Doc
RefCOCO+ val
RefCOCO testA
RefCOCO testB
POPE
Hallusion
Avg.
LLaVA-v1.5 7B
61.9
1507
33.5
64.1
58.2
31.2
21.5
50.0
64.5
47.4
85.9
36.2
52.7
Layer Decoupling
- vMHA †
61.9
1472
32.1
63.5
56.9
30.3
19
45.1
62.3
44.5
86.6
36.7
51.4
- vFFN †
62.2
1507
33.7
63.5
56.3
31.2
18.7
33.5
46
32.1
86.6
37.3
48.3
Shallow Layers Skipping
Table c : Effect of layer decoupling and shallow-layer skipping on multimodal reasoning. vMHA is crucial for spatially grounded reasoning in CV-centric tasks, while vFFN contributes to knowledge refinement. In contrast, shallow-layer skipping shows minimal degradation, confirming that early visual processing is largely redundant. † denotes training-based method.
Figure a : Clusters Distribution when τ=0.95 . (Left) Number of tokens in the top-5 clusters. (Right) Cluster similarity cross images. The cluster index is ranked by the number of tokens.
Figure b : Clusters Distribution when τ=0.8 . (Left) Number of tokens in the top-5 clusters. (Right) Cluster similarity cross images. The cluster index is ranked by the number of tokens.
Figure c : Clusters Distribution of LLaVA-v1.5 13B . (Left) Number of tokens in the top-5 clusters. (Right) Cluster similarity cross images. The cluster index is ranked by the number of tokens.
Figure d : Effect of LLM sink manipulation. (Left) Attention redistribution after pruning visual sinks at the input: attention shifts from visual sinks to textual sinks in the system prompt. (Right) Skipping MLP-2 weakens alignment between visual sinks and BOS, confirming its role in sink formation, while overall attention patterns remain stable.
Figure e : Examples from the multi-trajectory benchmark. (Top) Object recognition: a bus image with associated object, color, and counting questions. (Middle) OCR: a single character on white padding for text–color grounding. (Bottom) OCR with background: same setup with a colored background, testing contextual bias in color reasoning.
Figure f : Bias Toward Surrounding Color Context
Figure g : Semantic grounding in vision late-entry models.
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) incur high inference latency from long visual token sequences. Existing pruning methods commonly use attention maps or output features to estimate token importance or redundancy. Several recent approaches also exploit representation changes, but when and how these changes reflect foreground saliency and semantic consistency remain insufficiently understood. We analyze visual token representation dynamics across encoder depth and uncover two findings. First, the relationship between token update magnitudes and foreground saliency is layer-dependent: large token updates concentrate on foreground regions in two depth intervals, separated by several sink-dominated layers at intermediate depths. Second, similarities between token update directions better distinguish same-class from different-class tokens than those between encoder output features. Building on these findings, we propose MSDG-Prune, a training-free method that uses update magnitudes and directions to preserve salient and diverse visual information. Specifically, we group tokens by update-direction similarity and use query-weighted saliency derived from update magnitudes across a chosen depth window for group-wise token pruning. Extensive experiments across four MLLMs demonstrate the effectiveness and generalizability of MSDG-Prune. On LLaVA-NeXT, it retains 91.9% of uncompressed performance on average with only 5.6% of visual tokens, while achieving a 7.8x prefilling speedup. Code is available at https://github.com/liweixuan-hitsz/MSDG-Prune.
Weixuan Li, Zikun Zhou, Xinyi Zhuang +4
Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen · Shenzhen Loop Area Institute
Long visual token sequences often account for a substantial fraction of the computational overhead in multimodal large language models~(MLLMs). Existing approaches reduce this cost by pruning redundant visual tokens, but permanently discard visual evidence that may become useful in subsequent layers. We instead ask whether all visual tokens can be preserved while reducing the cost of repeatedly evolving the representations through the Transformer. To answer this question, we perform low-rank interventions on visual-to-text information flow. We find that, after visual-to-text attention is blocked, restoring only a few directions recovers most of the lost accuracy, suggesting the relevant visual influence is concentrated in a low-dimensional subspace. We further observe strong predictability in layer-specific visual states: lightweight MLPs approximate them with high cosine similarity and low reconstruction error. Motivated by these findings, we propose δ-Vision, which replaces repeated Transformer evolution of visual tokens with lightweight low-rank adapters that construct layer-wise visual memories while preserving all visual tokens for text retrieval. Across image and video benchmarks, δ-Vision achieves higher accuracy than visual token pruning baselines at comparable or lower computation, while delivering competitive inference efficiency without discarding visual tokens.
Jingdi lei, Junxian Li, Di Zhang +3
Nanyang Technological University · Shanghai Jiao Tong University · Fudan University +2
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved strong multimodal reasoning capabilities, but their efficiency is limited by the large number of visual tokens, which introduces substantial computational overhead. Visual token pruning offers a natural solution, yet existing methods are imperfect: attention-based criteria tend to retain redundant tokens, while diversity-based criteria are often agnostic to user instructions. Even methods that combine multiple criteria still lack a principled formulation of the intrinsic objective of token pruning. In this paper, we revisit visual token pruning from a first-principles perspective and formulate it as constructing Token Optimal Preservation Sets. Through a top-down information-theoretic analysis, we identify three fundamental principles for effective token selection: Task Relevance, Information Coverage, and Semantic Diversity. Based on these principles, we propose TOPS, a training-free and model-agnostic pruning module that can be applied to various MLLMs. Extensive experiments on 7 MLLM backbones and 14 benchmarks demonstrate that TOPS outperforms prior methods under diverse pruning settings. Notably, on LLaVA-NeXT, TOPS removes 77.8% of visual tokens while preserving 100.0% and 100.6% performance on its 7B and 13B models, respectively, suggesting that pruning redundant visual tokens can sometimes mitigate hallucination and inspire future lightweight MLLM design. Our code is available at https://github.com/MAX-7237/TOPS.
Tinghao Wang, Yichen Guo, Rui Huang +9
State Key Laboratory of Multimedia Information Processing, School of Computer Science, Peking University · University of Electronic Science and Technology of China · Nanyang Technological University +1