Adversarial Query Synthesis via Bayesian Optimization

Recent advances in query optimization have shifted from traditional rule-based and cost-based techniques towards machine learning-driven approaches. Among these, reinforcement learning (RL) has attracted significant attention due to its ability to optimize long-term performance by learning policies over query planning. However, existing RL-based query optimizers often exhibit unstable performance at the level of individual queries, including severe performance regressions, and require prolonged training to reach the plan quality of expert, cost-based optimizers. These shortcomings make learned query optimizers difficult to deploy in practice and remain a major barrier to their adoption in production database systems. To address these challenges, we present RELOAD, a robust and efficient learned query optimizer for database systems. RELOAD focuses on (i) robustness, by minimizing query-level performance regressions and ensuring consistent optimization behavior across executions, and (ii) efficiency, by accelerating convergence to expert-level plan quality. Through extensive experiments on standard benchmarks, including Join Order Benchmark, TPC-DS, and Star Schema Benchmark, RELOAD demonstrates up to 2.4x higher robustness and 3.1x greater efficiency compared to state-of-the-art RL-based query optimization techniques.

Traditional query processing engines require continuous development and extensions to support new techniques and user requirements, and in some cases, entirely new systems must be built from scratch. However, these engines are difficult to extend due to their internal complexity, and building new systems demands significant engineering effort and cost. To address this, we demonstrate GenDB, a generative query engine that shifts query processing from manually engineered systems to query processing code generation driven by Large Language Models (LLMs). An early prototype of GenDB uses LLM agents to generate instance-optimized query execution code tailored to specific data, workloads, and hardware resources. This prototype suits offline code generation for repetitive, templated queries, since the upfront generation cost amortizes over many executions and correctness can be ensured through extensive fuzz testing and manual inspection. For ad-hoc queries, GenDB can work with a traditional DBMS in a hybrid architecture: the DBMS handles one-off queries, while GenDB speeds up frequent SQL templates. Our demonstration allows users to (1) visually and interactively explore how GenDB analyzes workloads, profiles hardware resources and underlying data, produces query plans, generates code based on them, and finally uses an optimizer to iteratively achieve a correct and efficient implementation; (2) use visual inspection and analysis to gain qualitative insights into why GenDB produces code that achieves significantly better performance than state-of-the-art query engines on two benchmarks: TPC-H and a newly constructed benchmark designed to reduce potential data leakage from LLM training data; and (3) upload their own data and queries to explore GenDB with different LLMs and query patterns.

Selecting appropriate values for the configurable parameters of Database Management Systems (DBMS) to improve performance is a significant challenge. Recent machine learning (ML)-based tuning systems have shown strong potential, but their practical adoption is often limited by the high tuning cost. This cost arises from two main factors: (1) the system needs to evaluate a large number of configurations to identify a satisfactory one, and (2) for each configuration, the system must execute the entire target workload on the DBMS, which is both time-consuming. Existing studies have primarily addressed the first factor by improving sample efficiency, that is, by reducing the number of configurations evaluated. However, the second factor, improving runtime efficiency by reducing the time required for each evaluation, has received limited attention and remains an underexplored direction. We develop WAter, a runtime-efficient and workload-adaptive tuning system that finds near-optimal configurations at a fraction of the tuning cost compared with state-of-the-art methods. We divide the tuning process into multiple time slices and evaluate only a small subset of queries from the workload in each slice. Different subsets are evaluated across slices, and a runtime profile is used to dynamically identify more representative subsets for evaluation in subsequent slices. At the end of each time slice, the most promising configurations are evaluated on the original workload to measure their actual performance. Evaluations demonstrate that WAter identifies the best-performing configurations with up to 73.5% less tuning time and achieves up to 16.2% higher performance than the best-performing alternative.