A Comparative Study of UMAP and Other Dimensionality Reduction Methods

While UMAP is widely used for exploring high-dimensional data, typical workflows focus on its lower-dimensional embedding, largely overlooking the rich k-nearest-neighbor (kNN) graph that UMAP constructs internally. This graph encodes the data manifold in its original high-dimensional space, before the distortion that UMAP's 2D projection introduces. We demonstrate the untapped potential of this internal representation, showing how standard graph algorithms applied to this graph enhance data sensemaking: (1) PageRank identifies representative data points, (2) k-core decomposition reveals dense core regions versus sparse periphery, and (3) clustering coefficient detects tight-knit neighborhoods with highly-similar data points. Through quantitative and qualitative evaluation on MNIST and Fashion MNIST, we show that these graph-based analyses are not only practical but also competitive with or complementary to purpose-built methods (e.g., k-medoids for exemplar selection, HDBSCAN for density-based clustering).

Exploratory analysis of high-dimensional data rarely stops at a single embedding. In practice, analysts rerun dimensionality reduction after changing preprocessing, subsets, or hyperparameters, and standard nonlinear methods can quickly become the bottleneck. We introduce FastUMAP (Bipartite Manifold Approximation and Projection), a landmark-based method designed for this repeated-use setting. FastUMAP builds a sparse point-landmark fuzzy graph, computes a Nystrom spectral warm start from the induced landmark affinity, and then refines all sample coordinates with a UMAP-style objective on the bipartite graph. The landmark ratio r = m/n provides a direct way to trade runtime against fidelity. On 9 benchmark datasets spanning 178 to 70,000 samples, FastUMAP has the lowest runtime on 7 datasets in our reported default-implementation comparison on one workstation. On MNIST and Fashion-MNIST (n=70000), it runs in about 4.6 seconds, compared with about 73--75 seconds for Barnes--Hut t-SNE, while reaching 91.4% mean kNN accuracy versus 94.6% for the strongest accuracy baseline. FastUMAP is therefore best viewed as a fast option for repeated exploratory embedding, rather than as a replacement for accuracy-first methods.

Nonlinear dimensionality-reduction methods such as UMAP and PaCMAP adaptively normalize local distances during graph construction, erasing neighborhood scale from the data. This distorts more than relative cluster sizes: sparse structures like bridges between transitioning cell types and narrow spectral spikes in hyperspectral images can be suppressed or lost entirely. DensMAP adds a density penalty to correct this, but this penalty competes with UMAP's attraction-repulsion forces, scattering points far from their neighborhoods. ScaleMAP takes a different approach: each pairwise embedding displacement is divided by the geometric mean of the two endpoints' original-space local radii, re-injecting scale information as a change of variables rather than as a competing objective. Across standard benchmarks and scientific datasets from transcriptomics, hyperspectral imaging, and flow cytometry, ScaleMAP matches DensMAP on density preservation while maintaining UMAP-level neighborhood preservation. In transcriptomic data, it recovers sparse bridges between cell populations that UMAP collapses; in flow cytometry, it faithfully represents density structure across 17 orders of magnitude. The same principle applied to PaCMAP yields consistently improved density preservation, suggesting the approach generalizes beyond UMAP.