Proactive Guiding Strategy for Item-side Fairness in Interactive Recommendation

Interactive recommender systems (IRS) are increasingly optimized with Reinforcement Learning (RL) to capture the sequential nature of user-system dynamics. However, existing fairness-aware methods often suffer from a fundamental oversight: they assume the observed user state is a faithful representation of true preferences. In reality, implicit feedback is contaminated by popularity-driven noise and exposure bias, creating a distorted state that misleads the RL agent. We argue that the persistent conflict between accuracy and fairness is not merely a reward-shaping issue, but a state estimation failure. In this work, we propose DSRM-HRL, a framework that reformulates fairness-aware recommendation as a latent state purification problem followed by decoupled hierarchical decision-making. We introduce a Denoising State Representation Module (DSRM) based on diffusion models to recover the low-entropy latent preference manifold from high-entropy, noisy interaction histories. Built upon this purified state, a Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning (HRL) agent is employed to decouple conflicting objectives: a high-level policy regulates long-term fairness trajectories, while a low-level policy optimizes short-term engagement under these dynamic constraints. Extensive experiments on high-fidelity simulators (KuaiRec, KuaiRand) demonstrate that DSRM-HRL effectively breaks the "rich-get-richer" feedback loop, achieving a superior Pareto frontier between recommendation utility and exposure equity.

Large Language Model-based Recommender Systems (LRSs) have recently emerged as a new paradigm in sequential recommendation by directly adopting LLMs as backbones. While LRSs demonstrate strong knowledge utilization and instruction-following abilities, they have not been systematically studied under the long-standing long-tail problem. In this paper, we conduct an empirical study and reveal that LRSs face two distinct types of long-tail: i) prior long-tail, inherited implicitly from pretraining corpora, and ii) data long-tail, originating from skewed recommendation datasets. Our analysis shows that both contribute to the performance disparity between head and tail items, with the intersection of the two heads exhibiting an even stronger head effect. Nevertheless, the overall performance distribution in LRSs, especially on the tail, remains dominated by the data long-tail. To address this challenge, we propose Efficient Item-wise Sharpness-Aware Minimization (EISAM), a novel optimization framework that improves tail-item performance by adaptively regularizing the loss landscape at the item level. EISAM introduces an efficient penalty design that captures fine-grained item-specific sharpness while maintaining computational scalability for LLMs. In addition, we derive a generalization bound for EISAM. Our theoretical analysis shows that the bound decreases at a faster rate under our item-wise regularization, offering theoretical support for its effectiveness. Extensive experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate that EISAM significantly boosts tail-item recommendation performance while preserving overall quality, establishing the first systematic solution to the long-tail problem in LRSs.

Fairness-aware recommender systems often mitigate bias by increasing exposure to under-represented or long-tail content, commonly through mechanisms that promote novelty and diversity. In practice, the strength of such interventions is typically controlled using global hyperparameters, fixed regularization weights, heuristic caps, or offline tuning strategies. These approaches implicitly assume that a single level of exploration is appropriate across users, contexts, and stages of interaction. In this work, we study exploration saturation as a user-dependent phenomenon arising from fairness- and novelty-driven recommendation strategies. We define exploration saturation as the point at which further increases in exploration no longer improve user utility and may instead reduce engagement or perceived relevance. Rather than proposing a new fairness-aware algorithm or optimizing a specific objective, we empirically analyze how increasing exploration affects users across varied recommendation models. Through longitudinal experiments using MovieLens-1M and Last.fm datasets, our results indicate that fairness-induced exploration exhibits diminishing or non-monotonic returns and varies substantially across users. In particular, users with limited interaction histories tend to reach saturation earlier, suggesting that uniform fairness or novelty pressure can disproportionately disadvantage certain users. These findings reveal a trade-off between fairness and user experience, suggesting that recommendation systems should adapt not only to relevance but also to the amount of fairness-driven exploration applied to individual users.