cs.LGMar 3, 2026
SaveA Short Note on a Variant of the Squint Algorithm
Organizations: University of Southern California
Abstract
This short note describes a simple variant of the Squint algorithm of Koolen and Van Erven [2015] for the classic expert problem. Via an equally simple modification of their proof, we prove that this variant ensures a regret bound that resembles the one shown in a recent work by Freund et al. [2026] for a variant of the NormalHedge algorithm [Chaudhuri et al., 2009].
More in this topic
Regret Minimization
Regret minimization studies how to make sequential decisions whose cumulative loss or reward approaches the best available comparator in hindsight.
See all 113 papersPrediction with expert advice is a fundamental problem in online learning. When the time horizon is known in advance, the minimax cumulative regret over experts is asymptotically . This is achieved by the Multiplicative Weights Update algorithm with a learning rate tuned to , and is known to be tight. If instead the regret bound is required to hold simultaneously at every time , the best known guarantee has been ---a factor of worse---and it has remained unknown whether this factor of is necessary. We show that it is not. We give an algorithm, requiring no knowledge of the horizon, whose cumulative regret satisfies simultaneously for every .
A Note on How to Remove the Term from the Squint Bound
In Orabona and Pál [2016], we introduced the shifted KT potentials, to remove the factor in the parameter-free learning with expert bound. In this short technical note, I show that this is equivalent to changing the prior in the Krichevsky--Trofimov algorithm. Then, I show how to use the same idea to remove the factor in the data-independent bound for the Squint algorithm.
Tracking a Small Set of Experts in Online Convex Optimization
For the fundamental problem of prediction from expert advice, Freund asked whether one could compete with a comparator that switches times among only experts. For a discrete set of experts, this problem was resolved by Bousquet and Warmuth (2020), who gave an efficient algorithm with optimal regret matching the information-theoretic limit. We study the analogous problem in online convex optimization, where the action space is continuous. An inefficient algorithm can be derived by discretizing the action space and applying the Bousquet--Warmuth algorithm, giving regret of , while the best known efficient algorithm for this problem has regret . We show that this computational inefficiency is inherent, establishing a separation between the information-theoretic and polynomial-time regret achievable for this problem. Specifically, under the hypergraphic planted-clique conjecture, we show that for every polynomial-time algorithm there exist instances for which it incurs at least regret.