DisenReason: Behavior Disentanglement and Latent Reasoning for Shared-Account Sequential Recommendation
Organizations: School of Big Data and Software Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 401331, China · College of Computer Science and Engineering, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing, 401135, China · School of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, 401135, United Kingdom · Department of Plastic Surgery, Chongqing University Central Hospital, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing, 400000, China ·
Abstract
Shared-account usage is common on streaming and e-commerce platforms, where multiple users share one account. Existing shared-account sequential recommendation (SSR) methods often assume a fixed number of latent users per account, limiting their ability to adapt to diverse sharing patterns and reducing recommendation accuracy. Recent latent reasoning technique applied in sequential recommendation (SR) generate intermediate embeddings from the user embedding (e.g, last item embedding) to uncover users' potential interests, which inspires us to treat the problem of inferring the number of latent users as generating a series of intermediate embeddings, shifting from inferring preferences behind user to inferring the users behind account. However, the last item cannot be directly used for reasoning in SSR, as it can only represent the behavior of the most recent latent user, rather than the collective behavior of the entire account. To address this, we propose DisenReason, a two-stage reasoning method tailored to SSR. DisenReason combines behavior disentanglement stage from frequency-domain perspective to create a collective and unified account behavior representation, which serves as a pivot for latent user reasoning stage to infer the number of users behind the account. Experiments on four benchmark datasets show that DisenReason consistently outperforms all state-of-the-art baselines across four benchmark datasets, achieving relative improvements of up to 12.56% in MRR@5 and 6.06% in Recall@20.
Figures & tables
| Notation | Definition |
| Set of shared accounts | |
| The -th shared account | |
| Set of items | |
| The -th item | |
| Interaction matrix where indicates account interacted with item | |
| Interaction sequence of account in chronological order |
| HVIDEO | HAMAZON | |||
| E-domain | V-domain | M-domain | B-domain | |
| Items | 8,367 | 11,404 | 67,161 | 126,547 |
| Interactions | 2,129,500 | 1,893,784 | 2,196,574 | 2,135,995 |
| Avg. sequence length | 15.85 | 14.09 | 15.27 | 14.84 |
| Accounts | 13,714 | 13,724 | ||
| Sequences | 134,349 | 143,885 | ||
| Models | HV-E | HV-V | HA-M | HA-B | ||||
| RC@5 | MRR@5 | RC@5 | MRR@5 | RC@5 | MRR@5 | RC@5 | MRR@5 | |
| w/o LightGCN | 61.96 | 51.32 | 79.84 | 67.68 | 48.61 | 48.52 | 49.44 | 49.35 |
| w/o Behavior Disentanglement | 55.09 | 33.35 | 77.81 | 53.17 | 35.89 | 22.62 | 36.21 | 22.67 |
| w/o Adaptive Fusion | 62.51 | 50.88 | 81.59 | 67.64 | 49.05 | 48.76 | 49.54 | 49.39 |
| w/o Residual Operation | 63.32 | 51.37 | 81.34 | 67.69 | 49.08 | 48.84 | 49.50 | 49.32 |
| Our | 63.43 | 52.05 | 81.89 | 67.89 | 49.13 | 48.81 | 49.56 | 49.39 |
Sequential Recommendation
Sequential recommendation predicts what a user will choose next from ordered interactions, adapting to changing interests and context.
See all 136 papers