Organizations: 1Tsinghua University · 3Qwen Team, Alibaba Group · University of South California · University of California San Diego · Zhejiang University · Shanghai Jiao Tong University
The cold-start initialization stage plays a pivotal role in training Multimodal Large Reasoning Models (MLRMs), yet its mechanisms remain insufficiently understood. To analyze this stage, we introduce the Visual Attention Score (VAS), an attention-based metric that quantifies how much a model attends to visual tokens. We find that reasoning performance is strongly correlated with VAS (r=0.9616): models with higher VAS achieve substantially stronger multimodal reasoning. Surprisingly, multimodal cold-start fails to elevate VAS, resulting in attention distributions close to the base model, whereas text-only cold-start leads to a clear increase. We term this counter-intuitive phenomenon Lazy Attention Localization. To validate its causal role, we design training-free interventions that directly modulate attention allocation during inference, performance gains of 1−2% without any retraining. Building on these insights, we further propose Attention-Guided Visual Anchoring and Reflection (AVAR), a comprehensive cold-start framework that integrates visual-anchored data synthesis, attention-guided objectives, and visual-anchored reward shaping. Applied to Qwen2.5-VL-7B, AVAR achieves an average gain of 7.0% across 7 multimodal reasoning benchmarks. Ablation studies further confirm that each component of AVAR contributes step-wise to the overall gains. The code, data, and models are available at https://github.com/lrlbbzl/Qwen-AVAR.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Analysis of different models’ performance and Visual Attention Score (VAS) distribution. (a) Model performance by mean VAS; (b) VAS distribution across layers.
Figure 2: Performance gains from training-free attention modulation on MathVista, MathVision and MathVerse-VO.
Figure 3: Overview of Visual-Anchored Reflection data synthesis in 3 steps: Visual Description, Reflection-Enhanced Reasoning, and Visual Anchor Integration.
Configuration
Method Components
Benchmark Performance
VARD
AGTO
VARS
MathVista
MathVision
MathVerse-VO
MMStar
MMMU-VAL
MMMU-Pro
Hallusion.
Avg.
Baseline (Qwen2.5-VL-7B)
68.2
25.2
41.1
62.1
58.1
38.3
50.7
49.1
✓
70.6
32.9
43.5
61.1
55.2
38.7
55.3
51.0
✓
✓
72.0
34.1
44.0
62.8
58.3
39.8
57.2
52.6
AVAR-Thinker
✓
✓
✓
74.7
37.4
50.4
64.1
63.8
42.9
59.5
56.1
Table 2: Ablation study of our proposed components. Starting from the baseline, we show the performance impact of adding different modules, indicated by a checkmark (✓).
Method
Benchmark Performance
Avg.
MathVista
MathVision
MathVerse-VO
MMStar
MMMU-val
MMMU-Pro
Hallusion.
Baseline (Qwen2.5-VL-7B)
68.2
25.2
41.1
62.1
58.1
38.3
50.7
49.1
+ R1-OneVision
63.3
26.3
39.7
54.9
49.9
34.6
43.8
44.6
+ OpenVLThinker
68.9
25.3
37.8
58.7
55.7
36.0
54.1
48.1
+ Vision-SR1
67.6
27.9
42.3
46.9
50.7
36.3
42.1
44.8
+ VARD (Ours)
70.6
32.9
43.5
61.1
55.2
38.7
55.3
51.0
Table 3: Comparison of our Visual-Anchored Reflection Data (VAR) against other data-centric cold-start methods. The best scores are bold ; the second best are underlined .
Model
VAS
Avg. Performance
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
7.5
49.3
Qwen2.5-VL-7B + VARD Data
10.1
51.0
AVAR-CS
13.8
52.6
AVAR-Thinker
18.9
56.1
Table 4: Evolution of VAS and performance across AVAR training stages.
Appendix figures & tables7 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Configuration
Method Components
Benchmark Performance
VARD
AGTO
VARS
MathVista
MathVision
MathVerse-VO
MMStar
MMMU-VAL
MMMU-Pro
HallusionBench
Avg.
Baseline (Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct)
48.6
19.7
18.4
49.8
50.7
33.0
40.3
37.2
✓
56.6
25.5
25.4
58.0
55.2
36.4
45.5
43.2
✓
✓
57.4
25.2
26.6
58.8
56.2
37.0
46.4
44.0
AVAR-Thinker
✓
✓
✓
61.7
26.9
29.0
61.8
58.6
38.9
50.1
46.7
Appendix
Table 5: Ablation study of our proposed components on Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct model.
Figure 4: Attention allocation of Qwen2.5-VL-7B, R1-OneVision and OVR-CS on Mathvista.
Figure 5: Attention allocation of ThinkLite-VL, RevisualR1-CS and MIMO-VL-CS on Mathvista.
Figure 6: Attention allocation of Qwen2.5-VL, Vision-R1 and OVR-CS on Mathvision.
Cold-start
RL
Hyperparameter
Value
Hyperparameter
Value
Cutoff length
30,000
Max response length
30,000
Epochs
20
Weight decay
3×10−5
Learning rate
5×10−6
Learning rate
1×10−6
Warm-up ratio
0.1
Warm-up ratio
0.03
Batch size
512
Batch size
256
Appendix
Table 6: Hyperparameter search spaces used in experiments.
Figure 7: AVAR-Thinker on MathVerse-VO: A showcase demonstrating its powerful visual perception and reflective capabilities.
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a promising paradigm for advancing complex reasoning in large language models, and recent work extends RLVR to multimodal large language models (MLLMs). This transfer, however, surfaces a faithfulness challenge: faithful perception of task-relevant visual evidence and faithful use of that evidence during reasoning, leading to unsatisfactory gains on multimodal benchmarks. Specifically, existing perception supervision often operates on textual descriptions rather than natively on image regions, and faithful use is largely overlooked, exposing the perception-reasoning disconnect where correctly perceived evidence is dropped or contradicted during reasoning. To close these gaps, we propose Faithful-MR1, a training framework that anchors and reinforces visual attention to address both halves of faithful multimodal reasoning. The Anchoring stage turns perception into an explicit pre-reasoning subtask, supervising a dedicated <Focus> token's attention directly against image regions rather than through textual descriptions. The Reinforcing stage exposes faithful use through counterfactual image intervention, rewarding answer-correct trajectories that concentrate visual attention where vision causally matters. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Faithful-MR1 outperforms recent multimodal reasoning baselines on both Qwen2.5-VL-Instruct 3B and 7B backbones while using substantially less training data.
Changyuan Tian, Zhicong Lu, Huaxing Liu +7
AMAP, Alibaba Group · University of Chinese Academy of Sciences · Tsinghua University +1
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) achieve strong performance on visual reasoning tasks, yet remain prone to hallucinations and over-reliance on language priors, often generating answers without adequately using task-relevant visual evidence. Existing approaches primarily improve reasoning through reasoning-oriented supervision or inference-time strategies. In this work, we study a complementary question: can multimodal reasoning be improved by strengthening implicit visual grounding without directly supervising the reasoning process? Motivated by the functional specialization of attention heads, we investigate whether reasoning can be improved by guiding only the heads most responsive to visual evidence grounding. We propose Selective Probability Mass Concentration (sPMC), a training framework that identifies grounding-responsive heads and selectively regularizes their text-to-image attention. sPMC treats normalized attention over visual tokens as a spatial probability distribution and encourages the probability mass to be assigned to semantically relevant regions using segmentation-derived spatial priors. Adaptive Head Selection restricts this guidance to visually responsive heads while leaving the remaining heads unconstrained to preserve their complementary functions. Across 6 multimodal benchmark suites, sPMC achieves an average zero-shot improvement of 3% and gains of up to 11.3% across multiple MLLMs while regularizing only 3%-15% of their attention heads. These results demonstrate that targeted guidance of sparse and implicit visual evidence pathways can directly improve multimodal reasoning.
Jiaqi Deng, Zonghan Wu, Zhan Heng +3
University of Technology Sydney · East China Normal University · The University of New South Wales +2
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) often suffer from perceptual impairments under extended reasoning modes, particularly in visual question answering (VQA) tasks. We identify attention dispersion as the underlying cause: during multi-step reasoning, the model's visual attention becomes scattered and drifts away from question-relevant regions, effectively "losing focus" on the visual input. To better understand this phenomenon, we analyze the attention maps of MLLMs and observe that reasoning prompts significantly reduce attention to regions critical for answering the question. We further find a strong correlation between the model's overall attention on image tokens and the spatial dispersiveness of its attention within the image. Leveraging this insight, we propose a training-free Visual Region-Guided Attention (VRGA) framework that selects visual heads based on an entropy-focus criterion and reweights their attention, effectively guiding the model to focus on question-relevant regions during reasoning. Extensive experiments on vision-language benchmarks demonstrate that our method effectively alleviates perceptual degradation, leading to improvements in visual grounding and reasoning accuracy while providing interpretable insights into how MLLMs process visual information.
Ruiying Peng, Xueyu Wu, Jing Lei +3
Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School · Huawei Technologies