Training-Free Rate-Distortion-Perception Traversal With Diffusion
Organizations: Department of Information Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong · College of Electronic and Information Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
Abstract
The rate-distortion-perception (RDP) tradeoff characterizes the fundamental limits of lossy compression by jointly considering bitrate, reconstruction fidelity, and perceptual quality. While recent neural compression methods have improved perceptual performance, they typically operate at fixed points on the RDP surface, requiring retraining to target different tradeoffs. In this work, we propose a training-free framework that leverages pre-trained diffusion models to traverse the entire RDP surface. Our approach integrates a reverse channel coding (RCC) module with a novel score-scaled probability flow ODE decoder. We theoretically prove that the proposed diffusion decoder is optimal for the distortion-perception tradeoff under AWGN observations and that the overall framework with the RCC module achieves the optimal RDP function in the Gaussian case. Empirical results across multiple datasets demonstrate the framework's flexibility and effectiveness in navigating the ternary RDP tradeoff using pre-trained diffusion models. Our results establish a practical and theoretically grounded approach to adaptive, perception-aware compression.
Figures & tables
| Param. | Enc. (s) | Dec. (s) | Total (s) | |
| HiFiC [ 10 ] | 181M | 0.67 | 1.53 | 2.20 |
| CDC [ 11 ] | 53.8M | 0.07 | 3.25 | 3.32 |
| OneDC [ 15 ] | 1.4B | 0.31 | 0.43 | 0.74 |
| StableCodec [ 17 ] | 1.1B | 0.27 | 0.47 | 0.74 |
| Ours | 950M | 0.22-9.14 | 0.33-2.10 | 2.31-9.47 |
| DDCM [ 22 ] | 950M | 37.76 | 37.91 | 75.67 |
Appendix figures & tables13 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| Rate Control | DP Control | Proved Optimality in Gaussian | ||
| Image Restoration | [ 30 ] | / | ✓ | ✗ |
| [ 32 ] | / | ✓ | ✓ | |
| [ 31 ] | / | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Our ODE decoder | / | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Lossy Compression | HiFiC [ 10 ] | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| CDC [ 11 ] | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| MSE ( ) /FID | values | ||||||
| 10 | 30 | 50 | 99 | 200 | 296 | 498 | |
| 3.239/ 24.158 | 3.782/ 27.854 | 4.209/ 31.040 | 5.038/ 38.579 | 6.718/ 59.002 | 8.539/ 89.957 | 13.458/ 147.872 | |
| 3.238/ 24.026 | 3.783/ 27.529 | 4.210/ 30.425 | 5.040/ 37.295 | 6.725/ 55.286 | 8.549/ 84.503 | 13.509/ 141.376 | |
| 3.238/ 23.823 | 3.784/ 27.026 | 4.213/ 29.601 | 5.046/ 35.397 | 6.744/ 49.927 | 8.586/ 75.094 | 13.619/ 130.549 | |
| 3.237/ 23.692 | 3.786/ 26.734 | 4.216/ 29.067 | 5.054/ 34.241 | 6.766/ 46.616 | 8.628/ 68.504 | 13.732/ 120.375 | |
| 3.237/ 23.544 | 3.788/ 26.405 | 4.219/ 28.509 | 5.062/ 33.085 | 6.795/ 43.259 | 8.688/ 61.814 | 13.921/ 110.608 | |
Generative Image Compression
Generative image compression uses compact codes and learned generative priors to reconstruct plausible images at very low bitrates.
See all 35 papers