LUMINA: Foundation Models for Topology Transferable ACOPF

We introduce GridSFM, a framework that combines a pretrained foundation model across grid topologies with physics-informed fine-tuning for solving AC Optimal Power Flow (AC-OPF) at scale. It is a $15$ million parameter physics-inspired graph neural network pretrained across $54$ topologies of $500$ to $4{,}000$ buses. Our model attains a $2.45\%$ zero-shot generation-cost error on a $10{,}000$ bus case held-out operating conditions with no degradation as system size grows. Building on this, we pair the pretrained backbone with a physics-informed fine-tuning design based on Newton's method for power flow. With only $100$ solved instances, GridSFM adapts to unseen grids up to $10{,}000$ buses. We show it out performs single topology, dedicated neural network models that are trained more data, both in terms of cost and solver iterations when deployed as warm starting points. In designing this foundation model, we overcome the fact that the feasible set for AC-OPF can be disconnected. This is an obstruction that prevents any continuous neural network from approximating the solution map. To do so, we lift the problem and relax its constraints with logarithmically penalized slacks. We prove that the resulting elastic feasible set is contractible, that the AC-OPF minimizers remain minimizers of the elastic problem above an explicit penalty threshold, and that projecting an approximate solution back onto the AC-OPF feasible set is well posed. We release all models, data, and code so that the community can build on a shared starting point for AC-OPF.

AC optimal power flow (ACOPF) is foundational yet computationally expensive in power grid operations, driving learning-based surrogates for large-scale grid analysis. These surrogates, however, often fail to generalize across network topologies, a critical gap for deployment on grids not seen during training and for routine operational what-if studies. We introduce LUMINA-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark suite for ACOPF surrogate learning covering multi-topology pretraining, transfer, and adaptation. The benchmark evaluates homogeneous and heterogeneous architectures under single- and multi-topology learning settings using unified metrics that capture both predictive accuracy and physics-informed constraint violations. We additionally compare constraint-aware training objectives, including MSE, augmented Lagrangian, and violation-based Lagrangian losses, to characterize accuracy-robustness trade-offs across settings. Data processing, training, and evaluation frameworks are open-sourced as the LUMINA suite to support reproducibility and accelerate future research on feasibility-aware OPF surrogates.

Scientific foundation models (SciFMs) aim to learn generalizable representations of physical systems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs), enabling transfer across tasks and domains. While physics-informed methods, which leverage PDE residuals as supervisory signals, have shown promise in scientific machine learning (SciML) for improving accuracy and reducing data requirements, their potential in the context of SciFMs remains relatively unexplored. In this evaluation study, we investigate whether (and how) physics-informed pre-training improves the generalization, robustness, and data efficiency of SciFMs. We conduct systematic experiments across a diverse set of PDEs, ranging from simple problems with periodic boundary conditions to more challenging systems such as the Navier-Stokes equations and non-periodic geometries. Our results show that physics-informed pre-training provides clear benefits in nice,'' e.g., structured, well-aligned settings: it enhances generalization and reduces data dependence, compared to data-only pre-training. However, these advantages diminish significantly as the downstream tasks become harder,'' e.g., as they involve discontinuities or deviate from the pre-training distribution. In complex or structurally different problems, such as those involving new boundary conditions or PDE operators, physics-informed models may perform only on par with---or even worse---than data-driven baselines. While residual-based pre-training helps in idealized regimes, realizing broadly transferable SciFMs will likely require subtler spatiotemporal inductive biases and more principled integration of physical knowledge into model architectures.