Post-training quantization (PTQ) with computational invariance for Large Language Models~(LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable advances, however, their application to Multimodal Large Language Models~(MLLMs) presents substantial challenges. In this paper, we analyze SmoothQuant as a case study and identify two critical issues: Smoothing Misalignment and Cross-Modal Computational Invariance. To address these issues, we propose Modality-Aware Smoothing Quantization (MASQuant), a novel framework that introduces (1) Modality-Aware Smoothing (MAS), which learns separate, modality-specific smoothing factors to prevent Smoothing Misalignment, and (2) Cross-Modal Compensation (CMC), which addresses Cross-modal Computational Invariance by using SVD whitening to transform multi-modal activation differences into low-rank forms, enabling unified quantization across modalities. MASQuant demonstrates stable quantization performance across both dual-modal and tri-modal MLLMs. Experimental results show that MASQuant is competitive among the state-of-the-art PTQ algorithms. Source code: https://github.com/alibaba/EfficientAI.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: (a). Activation distributions during multimodal reasoning in MLLMs. Different dominant modalities emerge across MLLM components, leading to failure of general PTQ methods that diminish vision importance. (b). Impact of SmoothQuant’s uniform smoothing factors S computation on MLLM quantization performance (low SQNR, high PPL). (c). MASQuant addresses smoothing misalignment through the combination of MAS and CMC, thereby significantly enhancing PTQ performance in MLLMs. MBR Loss indicates Modality Balanced Reconstruction Loss.
Figure 2: Comparative analysis of SQNR degradation of Qwen2.5-Omni-3B under multimodal input condition. We selected 32 samples from OmniBench and computed the average SQNR for each layer.
Figure 3: The illustrated case demonstrates a text-vision dual-modal setting. (a) Schematic workflow of MAS and CMC with calibration data, (b) Illustration of how low-rank matrices L1 and L2 in CMC are utilized in MASQuant, exemplified with an MLP block.
Method
Qwen2.5-VL-3B
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
Bits
MMMU
OCR
Viz
S-QA
T-VQA
Avg
MMMU
OCR
Viz
S-QA
T-VQA
Avg
Acc ↑
Acc ↑
Acc ↑
Acc ↑
Acc ↑
Acc ↑
Acc ↑
Acc ↑
Acc ↑
Acc ↑
Acc ↑
Acc ↑
Dense
FP16
42.2
79.3
69.1
81.9
77.9
70.1
46.7
83.8
70.8
88.4
82.9
74.5
RTN
W4A16
40.9
77.9
63.0
81.3
75.8
67.8
43.3
83.7
67.8
81.3
82.1
71.6
AWQ
41.9
78.6
68.1
81.7
77.2
69.5
43.3
83.7
70.6
87.8
82.2
73.5
MBQ
41.9
78.5
68.0
81.5
76.8
69.3
44.4
82.8
70.6
87.8
82.9
73.7
Table 1: Comparison of MASQuant with existing quantization methods on multimodal benchmarks. OCR: OCRBench. Viz: Vizwiz. S-QA: ScienceQA. T-VQA: TextVQA. SQ: SmoothQuant. The best results are highlighted in bold .
Qwen2.5-Omni-3B
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Method
Bits
Audio-Text
Vision-Text
Vision-Audio-Text
Audio-Text
Vision-Text
Vision-Audio-Text
Libri
Wen
MMMU
Omnibench
Libri
Wen
MMMU
Omnibench
WER ↓
WER ↓
Acc ↑
Acc ↑
WER ↓
WER ↓
Acc ↑
Acc ↑
Dense
FP16
3.9
7.5
43.3
43.8
2.9
7.1
50.0
45.3
RTN
W4A16
4.4
9.2
32.2
39.6
3.4
6.7
44.4
43.8
AWQ
9.4
8.0
36.7
43.8
8.7
7.1
47.8
45.3
Table 2: Comparison of MASQuant with existing quantization methods on omni-modal MLLMs (vision, audio and text). SQ: SmoothQuant. Libri: Librispeech. Wen: Wenetspeech. The best results are highlighted in bold .
Figure 4: Percentage of unified smoothing factors from different modalities using SmoothQuant on Omni and VL MLLMs.
Figure 5: Effective ranks of ΔW is reduced across layers after SVD-based Whitening b SQNR improves as the rank ratio increases on both Qwen2.5-VL-3B and Qwen2.5-Omni-3B.
Omni-3B
VL-3B
Method
Opt.
Libri
OmniB.
T-VQA.
MMMU
Uniform
77.4
27.3
51.3
25.6
MAS
3.8
36.7
54.7
28.9
Uniform
✓
6.0
33.3
65.0
33.3
MAS
✓
3.6
47.7
68.2
46.7
Table 3: Effects of Modality-Aware Smoothing (W4A8).
Qwen2.5-VL-3B
λt
λv
PPL
MMMU
T-VQA.
S-QA
Avg
1.0
1.0
17.2
37.8
55.2
77.8
56.9
1.0
0.5
17.8
30.0
57.8
80.0
55.9
1.0
0.1
33.7
32.2
65.4
76.7
58.1
0.5
1.0
17.3
33.3
53.9
68.9
52.0
Table 4: Effects of Modality Loss Weight (W4A8).
Qwen2.5-VL-3B
Epoch
PPL
MMLU
T-VQA.
S-QA
Avg
1
23.9
38.9
52.2
79.5
56.9
2
18.6
37.8
67.5
78.4
61.2
5
17.6
34.4
65.9
77.4
59.2
10
17.0
37.8
68.2
76.5
60.8
Table 5: Effects of Modality-Aware Smoothing (W4A8).
Base modality
Computation
Memory
Text
d
0
Others
d + 2rd
2mrd
Table 6: Computation cost and memory at decoding phase, where d is hidden size, r is rank, and m is the number of extra modalities.
Figure 6: SQNR as a function of rank ratio for CMC on Qwen2.5-Omni-3B under W4A6 quantization. MAS applies independent modality-specific smoothing. MBQ employs a uniform factor optimized by modality balance reconstruction.
BS
Method
Rank
Prefill
Speedup
Mem
Mem
Ratio
(ms)
(GB)
Saving
FP16
-
191.82
/
13.73
/
1
MBQ
-
68.65
2.79 ×
4.85
2.83 ×
MAS
0.01
71.62
2.67 ×
4.97
2.76 ×
MAS
0.02
72.89
2.63 ×
5.04
2.73 ×
MAS
0.05
77.10
2.49 ×
5.37
2.56 ×
Table 7: End-to-end prefill-stage performance of Qwen2.5-VL-7B on Desktop RTX 4090 with fused GPU kernels (sequence length = 2048) under W4A4 setting. MAS: MASQuant. BS: Batch Size.
Conventional Post-Training Quantization (PTQ) methods struggle with 4-bit Omni-modal Large Language Models (OLLMs) due to the extreme distribution heterogeneity and disparate outlier patterns across modalities. To address this, we propose MorphoQuant, a modality-aware PTQ framework engineered to preserve cross-modal morphology and mitigate outlier loss. Specifically, we introduce Distribution-Aware Bias Compensation (DABC), which selectively absorbs long-tailed outliers into channel-wise biases. This mechanism safeguards outlier magnitudes while maintaining high-precision discretization for dense inliers, thereby preserving accurate discretization across diverse modal distribution. Complementing this, we propose Morphology-Directed Quantization Function Optimization (MDQFO) to co-optimize the quantization grid with the bias mask, ensuring fine-grained alignment across modalities. Extensive evaluations on Qwen2.5-Omni across benchmarks like MMMU and Video-MME demonstrate our approach's superiority. Notably, our W4A4 model achieves 76.63% on ScienceQA, significantly outperforming SOTA W4A4 methods and surprisingly surpassing the W4A16 baseline, which fully demonstrates the exceptional accuracy-efficiency trade-off of our framework.
Large Language Models (LLMs) with multimodal capabilities have revolutionized vision-language tasks, but their deployment often requires huge memory and computational resources. Post-training quantization (PTQ) has successfully compressed language models to as low as 1-bit precision, its effectiveness for multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) remains unexplored. In this paper, we present the first method for ultra-low-bit (<4-bit) quantization of MLLMs. Our analysis reveals that multimodal tokens and intermediate layer activations produced by them exhibit significantly higher entropy compared to text tokens, indicating greater functional complexity that makes MLLMs less tolerant to ultra-low bit quantization. However, this entropy varies significantly across layers, with some layers producing lower-entropy activation distributions that we empirically show can better tolerate ultra-low bit quantization. Existing PTQ methods optimize weight quantization within each layer but apply the same target precision uniformly, ignoring this variation in complexity across layers. Building on this insight, we propose LUQ: Layerwise Ultra-Low Bit Quantization, which characterizes each transformer layer's functional complexity via its output activation entropy and selectively applies ultra-low bit quantization to layers encoding simpler, more compressible functions. We also show that multimodal calibration (image and text tokens) boosts VQA performance in the ultra-low bit regime. Evaluated on LLaVA-1.5 and Qwen-2.5-VL across 9 VQA benchmarks, LUQ models use 40% and 31% less memory than their 4-bit counterparts while exhibiting less than 10% degradation on MME.
Shubhang Bhatnagar, Andy Xu, Kar-Han Tan +1
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · Work done as an intern at HP Inc. · University of California, Los Angeles +1
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown strong reasoning ability, but their high computational and memory costs hinder deployment in resource-constrained settings. While Post-Training Quantization (PTQ) and vision token pruning are standard compression techniques, they are usually treated as independent optimizations. In this paper, we show that these two techniques are strongly coupled: naively applying semantic-based token pruning to PTQ-optimized MLLMs can discard activation outliers that are important for numerical stability and thus worsen quantization errors in low-bit regimes (e.g., W4A4). To address this issue, we propose a quantization-aware vision token pruning framework. Our method introduces a lightweight hybrid sensitivity metric that combines simulated group-wise quantization error with outlier intensity. By combining this metric with standard semantic relevance scores, the method retains tokens that are both semantically informative and robust to quantization. Experiments on standard LLaVA architectures show that our method consistently outperforms naive integration baselines. At an aggressive pruning ratio that retains only 12.5% of visual tokens, our framework improves accuracy by 2.24% over the baseline and even surpasses dense quantization without pruning. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first method that explicitly co-optimizes vision token pruning and PTQ for accurate low-bit MLLM inference.
Xinhao Wang, Zhonyu Xia, Zhiwei Lin +2
Wangxuan Institute of Computer Technology, Peking University