cs.LGMar 6, 2026

Sparse Crosscoders for diffing MoEs and Dense models

Authors: Marmik Chaudhari, Nishkal Hundia, Idhant Gulati

Organizations: University of California, Berkeley · University of Maryland

Abstract

Mixture of Experts (MoE) achieve parameter-efficient scaling through sparse expert routing, yet their internal representations remain poorly understood compared to dense models. We present a systematic comparison of MoE and dense model internals using crosscoders, a variant of sparse autoencoders, that jointly models multiple activation spaces. We train 5-layer dense and MoEs (equal active parameters) on 1B tokens across code, scientific text, and english stories. Using BatchTopK crosscoders with explicitly designated shared features, we achieve ∼87%\sim 87\% fractional variance explained and uncover concrete differences in feature organization. The MoE learns significantly fewer unique features compared to the dense model. MoE-specific features also exhibit higher activation density than shared features, whereas dense-specific features show lower density. Our analysis reveals that MoEs develop more specialized, focused representations while dense models distribute information across broader, more general-purpose features.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. ExpertWeaver: Unlocking the Inherent MoE in Dense LLMs with GLU Activation Patterns

    Feb 17, 2026Ziyu Zhao, Tong Zhu, Zhi Zhang +6Mixture-of-Experts Language ModelsMixture-of-Experts Pruning

  2. Uncovering Intra-expert Activation Sparsity for Efficient Mixture-of-Expert Model Execution

    May 9, 2026Jongseok Park, Sunga Kim, Zhenyu Gu +2Activation SparsityMixture-of-Experts Inference