Talking Face Generation (TFG) strives to create realistic and emotionally expressive digital faces. While previous TFG works have mastered the creation of naturalistic facial movements, they typically express a fixed target emotion in synthetic videos and lack the ability to exhibit continuously changing and natural expressions like humans do when conveying information. To synthesize realistic videos, we propose a novel task called Emotionally Continuous Talking Face Generation (EC-TFG), which takes a text segment and an emotion description with varying emotions as driving data, aiming to generate a video where the person speaks the text while reflecting the emotional changes within the description. Alongside this, we introduce a customized model, i.e., Temporal-Intensive Emotion Modulated Talking Face Generation (TIE-TFG), which innovatively manages dynamic emotional variations by employing Temporal-Intensive Emotion Fluctuation Modeling, allowing it to provide emotion variation sequences corresponding to the input text to drive continuous facial expression changes in synthesized videos. Extensive evaluations demonstrate our method's exceptional ability to produce smooth emotion transitions and uphold high-quality visuals and motion authenticity across diverse emotional states.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Comparison between (a) the traditional audio-driven emotional TFG task and (b) the proposed EC-TFG task.
Figure 2: The Overview of TIE-TFG model. Specifically, our framework first utilizes a large-scale TTS model to generate emotional audio based on the text content and emotion description. Next, the emotion fluctuation prediction (EFP) module infers the emotional fluctuations from the audio and text input, with frame-level facial emotion labels serving as its training targets. Finally, we incorporate the obtained emotional fluctuation features into the talking face generation model via a cross-attention mechanism to produce a video with continuous emotional expression.
Method
Dataset
Input
Audio
FID ↓
FVD ↓
PSNR ↑
SSIM ↑
Sync-D ↓
E-FID ↓
EF-score ↑
MakeItTalk ( Zhou et al. 2020 )
V+A
TTS
25.168
245.786
17.25
0.5562
10.748
15.624
32.56
TTFS* ( Jang et al. 2024 )
V+T
-
19.620
-
30.28
0.9436
-
-
-
FT2TF* ( Diao et al. 2025 )
LRS2
V+T
-
22.520
-
33.20
0.9901
-
-
-
TIE-TFG (Ours)
V+T
TTS
18.763
210.420
36.96
0.9910
7.486
8.153
75.84
TIE-TFG (Ours)
V+T
GT
17.942
204.386
37.20
0.9922
7.245
8.097
78.65
DreamTalk ( Ma et al. 2023a )
V+A
GT
78.147
790.660
14.30
0.7848
8.364
15.696
32.21
Table 1: Quantitative comparison with existing talking face generation approaches on the HDTF and LRS2 dataset in the one-shot setting. The Audio column refers to the speech source for generation (GT: ground truth, TTS: synthesised audio, -: end-to-end method, no audio used as intermediate representation). * indicates that the data for this method is taken from the original paper.
Method
FID ↓
Emo-Acc ↑
EF-score ↑
Wav2Lip ( Schneider et al. 2019 )
67.49
17.87
10.34
EAMM ( Ji et al. 2022 )
22.38
49.85
32.55
EAT ( Gan et al. 2023 )
19.69
75.43
47.28
FWEI* ( Xu et al. 2024a )
16.77
83.55
-
TIE-TFG
15.27
84.05
67.58
Real video
0
84.37
100.00
Table 2: The quantitative comparisons with the existing TFG approaches on the MEAD dataset. * indicates that the data for this method is taken from the original paper.
Figure 3: Video generation results of the proposed approach given different emotion description.
Figure 4: Comparison of our method with existing emotion control approaches. The top part illustrates the predicted emotional fluctuations versus the pseudo-emotional labels from the reference video. The bottom part displays the generated results from different emotion control methods.
Metric
MEAD
CREAD
WER (Synthesized vs. GT)
5.1%
6.3%
Emotion Accuracy (Match with GT)
93.2%
95.4%
Subjective Rating (Naturalness / 5)
4.2
4.0
Table 3: Comparison of Synthesized vs. Ground Truth Audio.
Accuracy
F1-Score
Single-label
67.88
66.90
Multi-label
66.45
65.72
Table 4: Comparison of temporal-intensive emotion fluctuation prediction (EFP) model performance on audio with single and multiple emotion labels.
Method
FID ↓
FVD ↓
Sync-D ↓
E-FID ↓
EF-score ↑
Our
21.362
186.864
7.249
8.298
77.24
w/o EF
22.345
196.394
7.458
8.430
45.43
w/ Random
24.512
208.376
7.843
9.265
39.62
Table 5: Ablation of emotional fluctuation features.
Method
Accuracy
Precision
Recall
F1-score
Wav2Vec ( Schneider et al. 2019 )
40.26
40.43
38.13
39.26
HuBERT ( Hsu et al. 2021 )
62.93
62.39
62.94
62.53
Our
68.28
67.59
68.33
67.98
- w/o Text
65.34
64.78
66.12
65.45
- w/o Audio
63.89
63.45
64.75
64.11
Table 6: Ablation study of input features and audio backbone used in the emotion fluctuation prediction model.
Appendix figures & tables4 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Dataset
Frames
Accuracy
Precision
Recall
F1-score
HDTF
512
87.0
85.0
84.0
84.4
CREMA-D
1,024
85.3
84.5
83.8
84.1
Appendix
Table 7: Overall performance of the image emotion classification model on the HDTF and CREMA-D datasets.
Emotion
Accuracy
Precision
Recall
F1-score
Happy
90.5
90.1
89.0
89.5
Angry
88.0
88.3
87.5
87.9
Sad
85.0
85.0
84.2
84.6
Fear
83.0
83.5
82.8
83.1
Surprise
86.5
86.7
85.9
86.3
Neutral
87.5
87.8
87.1
87.4
Appendix
Table 8: Performance metrics per emotion label on the HDTF dataset and the CREMA-D dataset.
Figure 5: User studies on the quality of generated talking-face results.
Figure 6: Emotional conflict case analysis. We present several emotional conflict cases of the proposed method in situations where emotional conflicts arise among the input modalities, namely, the emotion description, reference image, and input text.
Talking face generation has gained significant attention as a core application of generative models. To enhance the expressiveness and realism of synthesized videos, emotion editing in talking face video plays a crucial role. However, existing approaches often limit expressive flexibility and struggle to generate extended emotions. Label-based methods represent emotions with discrete categories, which fail to capture a wide range of emotions. Audio-based methods can leverage emotionally rich speech signals - and even benefit from expressive text-to-speech (TTS) synthesis - but they fail to express the target emotions because emotions and linguistic contents are entangled in emotional speeches. Images-based methods, on the other hand, rely on target reference images to guide emotion transfer, yet they require high-quality frontal views and face challenges in acquiring reference data for extended emotions (e.g., sarcasm). To address these limitations, we propose Cross-Modal Emotion Transfer (C-MET), a novel approach that generates facial expressions based on speeches by modeling emotion semantic vectors between speech and visual feature spaces. C-MET leverages a large-scale pretrained audio encoder and a disentangled facial expression encoder to learn emotion semantic vectors that represent the difference between two different emotional embeddings across modalities. Extensive experiments on the MEAD and CREMA-D datasets demonstrate that our method improves emotion accuracy by 14% over state-of-the-art methods, while generating expressive talking face videos - even for unseen extended emotions. Code, checkpoint, and demo are available at https://chanhyeok-choi.github.io/C-MET/
Chanhyuk Choi, Taesoo Kim, Donggyu Lee +2
Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan, Republic of Korea
Audio-driven emotional talking face generation aims to synthesize realistic videos with expressive facial dynamics. However, existing methods struggle to balance controllability and visual fidelity. Although implicit representations capture rich semantics, they lack structural guidance, often resulting in averaged emotional expressions. In contrast, explicit geometric methods offer better control over facial expressions but tend to sacrifice high-frequency texture details. To address it, we propose GemTalk, a diffusion-based framework that combines the semantic richness of implicit representations with the structural precision of explicit geometric priors. We introduce a Vision-guided Audio Emotion Projection (V-AEP) module to extract implicit emotional lip and expression features. At the same time, a Diffusion-based Geometric Priors Generator (D-GPG) generates identity-aware blendshape coefficients as explicit structural priors. Crucially, our Geometry-guided Emotion Modulation (GEM) module leverages these geometric priors to recalibrate the magnitude of implicit features, enabling precise, continuous control over emotional expressions, especially emotion intensity, without sacrificing visual quality. Extensive experiments show GemTalk achieves superior performance in photo-realism, and facial emotional dynamics.
Chenggong Hu, Shaoyin Ma, Yi Wang +3
School of Software Technology, Zhejiang University Ningbo, China
Emotional 3D talking head generation aims to synthesize expressive facial animations with accurate lip synchronization. However, existing methods often rely on discrete emotion categories, which fail to capture the continuous evolution of affect. They also overlook the temporal frequency mismatch between audio articulation and emotional expression. In this paper, we propose CETalk, an audio-driven 3D facial animation framework conditioned on continuous Valence--Arousal (VA) representations for fine-grained emotion control. CETalk predicts a sequence of FLAME parameters through three key components: a Dynamic Emotion Modulation Module that adaptively scales emotional intensity using audio-derived cues; a Multi-Scale Temporal Modeling mechanism that employs parallel branches to decouple high-frequency articulatory movements from low-frequency emotional dynamics; and a Dynamic Fusion Mechanism that integrates these multi-scale features via an adaptive gating network. To support training and evaluation, we construct 3D-VA-MEAD, a large-scale dataset with automatically estimated VA annotations and reconstructed 3D facial motions. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CETalk outperforms state-of-the-art methods in both lip-sync accuracy and emotional expressiveness, while enabling smooth and controllable emotion transitions.
Peng Jia, Li Dai, Zhen Xiao +2
Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, Anhui, China