Organizations: VI Department, Institute for Infocomm Research, A*STAR, Singapore, 138632 · School of ISE, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China · School of CST, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
Based on literature review about existing diffusion models and flow matching with a neural network to predict a predefined target from noisy data, a unified representation is first proposed for these models using two simple linear equations in this paper. Theoretical analysis of the proposed model is then presented. Our theoretical analysis shows that the correlation between the noisy data and the predicted target is sometimes weak in the existing diffusion models and flow matching. This might affect the prediction (or learning) process which plays a crucial role in all models.
Figures & tables
diffusion model in [ 2 , 10 ]
diffusion model in [ 3 , 11 ]
models in [ 20 , 21 ]
Trigflow in [ 5 ]
flow matching in [ 4 ]
a11(t)
αt
αt
σd2+t2σd
cos(t)
1−t
a12(t)
σt
σt
σd2+t2t
sin(t)
t
a21(t)
0
1
a12(t)
−a12(t)
−1
a22(t)
1
0
−a11(t)
a11(t)
1
∣A(t)∣
αt
−σt
−1
1
1
ΨXt,ω
σt
αt
0
0
2((t−1)2+t2)2t−1
TABLE I: Theoretical analysis of existing diffusion models and flow matching. For simplicity, the deterministic method in [ 22 ] is chosen for illustration.
Flow Matching (FM) is a simulation-free method for learning a continuous, invertible flow that interpolates between two distributions, and in particular generates data from noise. Inspired by the variational nature of the diffusion process as a gradient flow, we introduce a stepwise FM model, Local Flow Matching (LFM), which sequentially learns a sequence of FM submodels, each matching a diffusion process up to the time-step size in the data-to-noise direction. In each step, the two distributions to be interpolated by the sub-flow model are closer than those in the full-flow matching model, which interpolates data to noise distributions, enabling smaller models with more efficient training. This variational perspective also allows us to prove a theoretical generation guarantee for the proposed flow model in terms of the χ2-divergence between the generated and true data distributions, leveraging the contraction property of the diffusion process. In practice, the stepwise structure of LFM is naturally amenable to model distillation, and various distillation techniques can be applied to accelerate generation. We empirically demonstrate that LFM achieves competitive generative performance compared to FM on unconditional generation of tabular and image datasets, and on conditional generation of robotic manipulation policies.
Chen Xu, Xiuyuan Cheng, Yao Xie
H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology. · Department of Mathematics, Duke University
The performance of generative diffusion models is determined by the choice of the reference diffusion process connecting the empirical and prior distributions. Conventional approaches typically trade off simulation-free training against finite-time generation. We propose a framework for designing the reference process that achieves both simultaneously. The key idea is to prescribe tractable time-dependent conditional distributions and then construct the reference process realizing them as its marginals. This framework reveals that score matching is not fundamental to diffusion-model training but instead emerges naturally through reversal of the reference process. We further show that conditional flow matching arises as the small-noise limit of the proposed framework.
Kentaro Kaba, Masayuki Ohzeki, Yuki Sughiyama
Department of Physics, Institute of Science Tokyo, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-9551, Japan · 2Graduate School of Information Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi 980-9564, Japan · 3Research and Education Institute for Semiconductors and Informatics, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Kumamoto 860-8555, Japan +1
Diffusion models have emerged as a dominant framework for generative modeling, but their mathematical foundations are often presented separately through diffusion probabilistic models, score-based modeling, stochastic differential equations, and numerical sampling methods. We write this tutorial to provide a unified and self-contained account of these viewpoints from the perspective of differential equations. Starting from a conditional Gaussian noising process, we derive ordinary differential equation (ODE) and stochastic differential equation (SDE) representations, pass to the corresponding marginal forward dynamics, and then obtain the reverse-time SDE and probability-flow ODE that make generation possible. We show that the central unknown quantity in reverse sampling is the marginal score, explain how score matching becomes the standard denoising objective under a noise-prediction parameterization, and discuss practical reverse-time sampling and guidance. We further place DDPM, DDIM, flow matching, and score-based SDEs in a common framework, and conclude with diffusion language models in continuous embedding space together with a brief discussion of discrete masked-token diffusion. The tutorial is intended as a bridge between the analytical foundations of diffusion processes and the modern generative algorithms built upon them.
Jiayi Fu, Yuxia Wang
INSAIT, Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, Bulgaria