Organizations: BioGeometry · School of Computer Science, Peking University · Mila - Québec AI Institute · Université de Montréal · HEC Montréal · CIFAR AI Research Chair
Protein sequence design must balance designability, defined as the ability to recover a target backbone, with multiple, often competing, developability properties such as solubility, thermostability, and expression. Existing approaches address these properties through post hoc mutation, inference-time biasing, or retraining on property-specific subsets, yet they are target dependent and demand substantial domain expertise or careful hyperparameter tuning. In this paper, we introduce ProtAlign, a multi-objective preference alignment framework that fine-tunes pretrained inverse folding models to satisfy diverse developability objectives while preserving structural fidelity. ProtAlign employs a semi-online Direct Preference Optimization strategy with a flexible preference margin to mitigate conflicts among competing objectives and constructs preference pairs using in silico property predictors. Applied to the widely used ProteinMPNN backbone, the resulting model MoMPNN enhances developability without compromising designability across tasks including sequence design for CATH 4.3 crystal structures, de novo generated backbones, and real-world binder design scenarios, making it an appealing framework for practical protein sequence design.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: The ProtAlign framework. ProtAlign optimizes the policy model in a semi-online regime composed of alternating rollout and training stages. In the rollout stage, protein backbones are sampled from the training set, and the current policy model generates rollouts at a higher temperature. These rollouts are evaluated with property predictors, and pairwise preference datasets are constructed for each property. During training, pairwise entries are drawn evenly across the datasets, and an adaptive preference margin is introduced to resolve conflicts among multiple objectives.
Method
Designability Metrics
Developability Metrics
AAR ↑
RMSD ↓
TM score ↑
PLDDT ↑
EP ↓
Sol ↑
Thermo ↑
Test Dataset
3.97
0.761
80.8
5.80
0.620
0.246
1.000
ESM-IF
4.36
0.737
78.4
6.11
0.733
0.719
0.464
InstructPLM 1 1 1 InstructPLM was trained on the 4.2 version of the CATH dataset. (default)
6.81
0.628
73.4
7.97
0.653
0.396
0.574
InstructPLM (T=0.1)
6.96
0.632
74.4
7.31
0.657
0.455
0.584
ProteinMPNN
4.30
0.740
79.1
6.70
0.719
0.769
0.389
Table 1: Comparison of protein sequence design methods on the CATH 4.3 test set across various metrics. Results for our RL-based MoMPNN trained with different annotator combinations (TM, IG, EP, Sol, and Thermo) are shown. The best and second-best values are highlighted in bold and underlined , respectively.
Method
Designability Metrics
Developability Metrics
RMSD ↓
TM score ↑
PLDDT ↑
EP ↓
Sol ↑
Thermo ↑
ESM-IF
13.51
0.461
57.6
7.27
0.616
0.806
InstructPLM (default)
22.44
0.134
32.6
3.33
0.539
0.278
InstructPLM (T=0.1)
22.58
0.132
33.5
2.73
0.538
0.367
ProteinMPNN
6.86
0.718
70.0
8.32
0.731
0.978
ProteinDPO
16.77
0.296
43.5
14.70
0.596
0.145
Table 2: Comparison of protein sequence design methods across different evaluation metrics on de novo backbone structures from RFDiffusion. The best results and the second-best results are marked bold and underlined . Note that AAR is not evaluated in this setting, as alignment to reference sequences is not applicable in de novo design.
Figure 2: The result for ProteinMPNN, SolubleMPNN and MoMPNN on the binder design benchmark.
Appendix figures & tables5 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Figure 3: Quantative Analysis of ProteinMPNN, SolubleMPNN and MoMPNN generated sequences on hydrophilic-related metrics.
Figure 4: Differences in amino acid composition of proteins from ProteinMPNN, HyperMPNN and MoMPNN.
Method
Designability Metrics
Evo. ppl ↓
AAR ↑
RMSD ↓
TM score ↑
PLDDT ↑
ESM-IF
4.033
0.805
80.55
6.538
0.509
InstructPLM
7.196
0.683
74.77
6.946
0.607
ProteinMPNN
3.658
0.823
82.09
6.843
0.441
Weighted-score DPO
3.783
0.811
80.74
5.843
0.410
MoMPNN [IG+ESM]
3.706
0.825
82.28
6.205
0.431
Appendix
Table 3: Comparison of protein sequence design methods across different evaluation metrics on de novo backbone structures from RFDiffusion. The best results and the second-best results are marked bold and bold .
Figure 5: Analysis of MoMPNN [IG+ESM] and Weighted-score DPO. Initial Guess, Evo. ppl and recover rate changes across each round of iterative refinement.
Design Target
Input PDB
Target chain and residue numbers
Target Hotspot
Binder length(for benchmarks)
PD-L1
5O45
A18-132
A56, A115, A123
50-120
SC2RBD
6M0J
E333-526
E485, E489, E494, E500, E505
50-120
BHRF1
2WH6
A2-158
A65, A74, A77, A82, A85, A93
80-120
PD-1
AF2 prediction
A32-146
A64, A126, A129, A133
80-150
CLN1-14
AF2 prediction
A1-188
A31, A46, A55, A152
80-175
Appendix
Table 4: Input structures, hotspot settings and binder lengths for benchmarks.
Designing proteins with desired functions or properties represents a core goal in synthetic biology and drug discovery. Recent advances in protein language models (PLMs) have enabled the generation of highly designable protein sequences, while preference alignment provides a promising way to steer designs toward desired functions and properties. Nevertheless, they often trigger catastrophic forgetting of pretrained knowledge, degrading basic designability and failing to balance multiple competing objectives. To address these issues, we draw inspiration from On-Policy Distillation (OPD), an advanced post-training method renowned for mitigating catastrophic forgetting through its mode-seeking nature. In this work, we propose ProteinOPD, a multi-objective preference alignment framework that can effectively balance multiple preference objectives while maintaining the inherent designability of PLMs. ProteinOPD adapts a pretrained PLM into preference-specific teachers and distills their knowledge into a shared student via token-level OPD on the student's own trajectories. During this process, the student is aligned to a unique normalized geometric consensus of weighted teachers while ensuring bounded optimization under conflicts. This bridges the gap for OPD in multi-objective/teacher alignment. Extensive experiments show that ProteinOPD achieves substantial gains on target preference objectives without compromising the designability, with an 8x training speedup over RL-based alignment competitors.
Yulin Zhang, He Cao, Zihao Jiang +6
Tsinghua University · International Digital Economy Academy · Hong Kong University of2026 Science and Technology (Guangzhou) +1
Protein inverse folding aims to design an amino acid sequence that will fold into a given backbone structure, serving as a central task in protein design. Two main paradigms have been widely explored. Template-based methods exploit database-derived structural priors and can achieve high local precision when close structural neighbors are available, but their dependence on database coverage and match quality often degrades performance on out-of-distribution (OOD) targets. Deep learning approaches, in contrast, learn general structure-to-sequence regularities and usually generalize better to new backbones. However, they struggle to capture fine-grained local structure, which can cause uncertain residue predictions and missed local motifs in ambiguous regions. We introduce Refold, a novel framework that synergistically integrates the strengths of database-derived structural priors and deep learning prediction to enhance inverse folding. Refold obtains structural priors from matched neighbors and fuses them with model predictions to refine residue probabilities. In practice, low-quality neighbors can introduce noise, potentially degrading model performance. We address this issue with a Dynamic Utility Gate that controls prior injection and falls back to the base prediction when the priors are untrustworthy. Comprehensive evaluations on standard benchmarks demonstrate that Refold achieves state-of-the-art native sequence recovery of 0.63 on both CATH 4.2 and CATH 4.3. Also, analysis indicates that Refold delivers larger gains on high-uncertainty regions, reflecting the complementarity between structural priors and deep learning predictions.
Yiran Zhu, Changxi Chi, Hongxin Xiang +3
AIMS Lab, HKUST (GZ), Guangzhou, China · North China Electric Power University, Baoding, China · Westlake University, Hangzhou, China +4
We introduce RosettaSearch, an inference-time multi-objective optimization approach for backbone conditioned protein sequence design. We use large language models (LLMs) as a generative optimizer within a search algorithm capable of controlled exploration and exploitation, using rewards computed from RosettaFold3, a structure prediction model, under a strict computational budget. In a large-scale evaluation, we apply RosettaSearch to 400 suboptimal sequences generated by LigandMPNN (a state-of-the-art model trained for protein sequence design), recovering high-fidelity designs that LigandMPNN's single-pass decoding fails to produce. RosettaSearch's designs show improvements in structural fidelity metrics ranging between 18% to 68%, translating to a 2.5x improvement in design success rate. We observe that these gains in success rate are robust when RosettaSearch-designed sequences are evaluated with an independent structure prediction oracle (Chai-1) and generalize across two distinct LLM families (o4-mini and Gemini-3), with performance scaling consistently with reasoning capability. We further demonstrate that RosettaSearch improves the sequence fidelity of ProteinMPNN designs for de novo backbones from the Dayhoff atlas, showing that the approach generalizes beyond native protein structures to computationally generated backbones. We also demonstrate a multi-modal extension of RosettaSearch with vision-language models, where images of predicted protein structures are used as feedback to incorporate structural context to guide protein sequence generation. To our knowledge, this is the first large-scale demonstration that LLMs can serve as effective generative optimizers for backbone-conditioned protein sequence design, yielding systematic gains without any model retraining.
Meghana Kshirsagar, Allen Nie, Ching-An Cheng +5
AI for Good, Microsoft Redmond · Google DeepMind · Google Research +3