Organizations: Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University · Harbin Institute of Technology · Beijing Institute of Technology · Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen
Although large vision-language models (LVLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities, they are prone to hallucinations in multi-image tasks. We attribute this issue to limitations in existing attention mechanisms and insufficient cross-image modeling. Inspired by this, we propose a structured hallucination mitigation framework involving Cross-Image Attention calibration and Preference Learning (CAPL). CAPL explicitly enhances inter-image interactions at the architectural level while reinforcing reliance on genuine cross-image evidence during training, thereby improving the model's perception and modeling of cross-image associations. Specifically, we (i) introduce a selectable image token interaction attention mechanism to establish fine-grained cross-image entity alignment and information flow; (ii) design a cross-image modeling-based preference optimization strategy that contrasts reasoning outcomes under full inter-image interaction and those obtained when images are mutually invisible, encouraging the model to ground its predictions in authentic visual evidence and mitigating erroneous inferences driven by textual priors. Experimental results demonstrate that CAPL consistently improves performance across multiple model architectures, achieving stable gains on both multi-image hallucination and general benchmarks. Notably, performance on single-image visual tasks remains stable or slightly improves, indicating strong generalization capability.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Overview of our training framework and evaluation. (a) Attention Calibration: Reactivates cross-image token attention on top of causal attention. (b) Attentive Preference Contrast: Generates positive and negative attention for preference learning via inter-image reconnection and truncation. (c) Multi-Image Task: Illustrates a consistency question; incorrect answers ignore inter-image distinctions while correct ones leverage key inter-image information. (d) Evaluation: Our framework perform well on multi-image hallucination and general tasks, while preserving single-image capabilities.
Figure 2: The overview of the CAPL framework. The pipeline consists of attention modification and preference learning. Image tokens are ranked to select key tokens, and the original causal mask is modified into enhanced cross-image attention (reactivating inter-image token interactions) and truncated cross-image attention (blocking inter-image interactions). The enhanced mask is used for inference and positive sample construction, while the truncated mask generates negative samples for DPO training.
Models
Params
Hallucination Eval
General Capability Eval
BLINK
MUIRB
NLVR2
QBench2
MIBench
MIRB
Idefics2
8B
45.24
29.85
56.81
38.6
49.28
37.56
Idefics3
8B
48.34
30.96
85.14
64.2
54.18
–
LLaVA-OV
7B
44.77
30.85
86.82
70.1
62.37
47.3
LLaVA-Next
7B
41.19
30.50
50.34
39.5
–
–
InternVL2
7B
50.34
45.61
77.68
69.8
59.37
53.15
Table 1: Performance comparison on hallucination and general capability evaluation in multi-image scenarios. BLINK and MUIRBench are hallucination tasks, which constitute the core evaluation of our method. “–” indicates results that cannot be measured.
Models
POPE ↑
CHAIRi ↓
CHAIRs ↓
MMB ↑
AMBER ↑
Idefics2
86.35
4.8
7.6
76.46
86.40
Idefics3
85.50
7.6
40.2
75.51
84.09
LLaVA-OV
89.15
8.7
34.0
81.70
83.99
LLaVA-Next
87.42
13.3
22.6
69.93
84.96
InternVL2
84.39
8.3
34.0
82.90
86.00
Qwen2VL
84.00
10.5
28.8
81.53
85.96
Table 2: Performance comparison on single-image benchmarks. ↑ indicates higher is better; ↓ indicates lower is better.
Qwen2.5-VL
InternVL2.5
GLM4.1VBase
BLINK
MUIRBench
BLINK
MUIRBench
BLINK
MUIRBench
Base
54.60
58.42
54.81
48.54
58.17
57.84
+Attn
55.34
58.96
55.02
49.07
58.23
58.07
Ours
57.76
62.00
55.76
52.12
61.33
60.57
Table 3: Ablation study on our framework components: we evaluate results by progressively adding our cross-image attention and attentive preference training.
Model
Overall
Action
Similarity
Cartoon
Counting
Diagram
Difference
Geographic
I-T Match
Ordering
Scene
Grounding
Retrieval
GLM4.1VBase
57.9
46.3
58.7
46.2
39.3
73.9
57.9
41.0
68.8
20.3
66.1
28.6
59.6
+Attn
58.1
47.0
56.6
46.2
40.2
74.9
57.4
41.0
68.8
23.4
65.6
28.6
61.0
⊕ Original DPO
59.5
46.3
62.8
47.4
40.6
75.6
58.5
44.0
73.3
20.3
69.4
31.0
55.8
⊕ Truncated DPO
60.6
48.2
59.7
48.7
42.7
76.9
60.3
48.0
72.6
21.9
70.4
31.0
59.6
Δ
+2.7
+1.8
+1.0
+2.6
+3.4
+3.0
+2.4
+7.0
+3.9
+1.6
+4.3
+2.4
+0.0
Table 4: Ablation on negative sample construction across all subsets of MUIRBench. We compare the Base Model of GLM4.1VBase, DPO with original negatives, and DPO with truncated negatives.
Figure 3: Comparison of three models’ accuracies on two types of negative samples: those generated by the original model structure (Original Negatives) and those generated using the truncated attention structure (Truncated Negatives). Lower accuracy indicates that the negative samples are more challenging.
Figure 4: Ablation results with respect to the Select Ratio ρ and the NLL Loss Ratio λ .
Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have achieved remarkable performance across diverse multimodal tasks, yet they continue to suffer from hallucinations, generating content that is inconsistent with the visual input. Prior work DHCP (Detecting Hallucinations by Cross-modal Attention Pattern) has explored hallucination detection from the perspective of cross-modal attention, but does not address hallucination mitigation. In this paper, we propose MHSA (Mitigating Hallucinations via Steered Attention), a lightweight framework that mitigates hallucinations by learning to correct cross-modal attention patterns in LVLMs. MHSA trains a simple three-layer MLP generator to produce corrected attention, guided by supervisory signals from the DHCP discriminator and the LVLM itself. During inference, MHSA mitigates both discriminative and generative hallucinations across various datasets and LVLMs by simply replacing the original cross-modal attention with the corrected one, without modifying any LVLM parameters. By extending cross-modal attention mechanisms from hallucination detection to hallucination mitigation, MHSA offers a novel perspective on hallucination research in LVLMs and helps enhance their reliability.
Wei Ding, Yilin Li, Yudong Zhang +4
Tsinghua University Beijing, China · Tsinghua University, Tencent Beijing, China · Tencent Beijing, China +2
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are critically hampered by hallucination, generating content inconsistent with the provided image. In this paper, we identify an internal signature of hallucination: progressive degradation of text-to-image cross-attention during generation, leading to specific failure patterns like unfocused or biased attention. Existing mitigation strategies are largely outcome-driven and do not explicitly target this failure mode. To address this problem, we propose ADAPT (Attention Dynamics Alignment with Preference Tuning), an attention-based framework that intervenes directly on text-to-image cross-attention dynamics. We propose ADAPT with three key contributions: a cross-attention visual anchor refined from early decoding to provide stable spatial grounding, an attention-supervised inference mechanism that detects and corrects attention drift online, and a Visual Attention Guidance DPO that aligns preferences toward visually grounded responses. Experiments show that each component of ADAPT contributes to hallucination reduction, and the full framework achieves new best results across multiple hallucination benchmarks, reducing hallucination rates by 40%-60% across mainstream backbones while preserving general multimodal capabilities. Our work provides an attention-based perspective on mitigating hallucinations by exploring the model's internal text-to-image cross-attention behaviors. Code is available at https://github.com/yao-ustc/ADAPT
Zhiyuan Yao, Zheren Fu, Zhixiao Zheng +3
University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China · State Key Laboratory of Communication Content Cognition, People’s Daily Online, China · Huawei Technologies Ltd., China
Large vision-language models (LVLMs) are increasingly being applied to multi-view image inputs captured from diverse viewpoints. Despite this growing use, current LVLMs often generate incorrect responses due to visual interference from non-target instances or viewpoints, a phenomenon we term multi-view hallucination (MVH). To systematically analyze this problem, we construct MVH-Bench, a benchmark comprising 4.8k question-answer pairs targeting two types of hallucination: cross-instance and cross-view. Empirical results show that MVH is prevalent across recent LVLMs. To address this issue, we propose Reference Shift Contrastive Decoding (RSCD), a training-free decoding technique that suppresses visual interference by generating negative logits through attention masking. Experiments on MVH-Bench with LLaVA-OneVision and Qwen2.5-VL demonstrate that RSCD improves performance by up to 25.7 and 94.8 points over existing hallucination mitigation methods, highlighting the effectiveness of RSCD.
Wooje Park, Insu Lee, Soohyun Kim +4
Seoul National University · Sungkyunkwan University