Organizations: School of Computer Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China · Key Laboratory of New Generation Artificial Intelligence Technology and Its Interdisciplinary Applications (Southeast University), Ministry of Education, China
Transferring knowledge by fine-tuning large-scale pre-trained networks has become a standard paradigm for downstream tasks, yet the knowledge of a pre-trained model is tightly coupled with monolithic architecture, which restricts flexible reuse across models of varying scales. In response to this challenge, recent approaches typically resort to either parameter selection, which fails to capture the interdependent structure of this knowledge, or parameter prediction using generative models that depend on impractical access to large network collections. In this paper, we identify the low-frequency components of model weights as the concrete carrier of foundational, task-agnostic knowledge, its learngene", and validate this by demonstrating its efficient inheritance by downstream models and tasks. Based on this insight, we propose FRONT (FRequency dOmain kNowledge Transfer), a novel framework that uses the Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) to isolate the low-frequency learngene". This learngene can be seamlessly adapted to initialize models of arbitrary size via simple truncation or padding, a process that is entirely training-free. For enhanced performance, we propose an optional low-cost refinement process that introduces a spectral regularizer to further improve the learngene's transferability. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FRONT achieves the state-of-the-art performance, accelerates convergence by up to 15× in vision tasks, and reduces training FLOPs by an average of 40.5% in language tasks. Code is available at https://github.com/LUcy0505/FRONT.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: (a) Five different-scaled models initialized from the same DeiT are fine-tuned on the same downstream tasks. (b) A pre-trained DeiT is fine-tuned on five different downstream tasks. We plot the cosine similarity between the low-frequency components of the fine-tuned weights and their original pre-trained state over the training process. Each dashed line represents an individual fine-tuned model, while the solid line indicates their average.
Figure 2: The overview of FRONT and FRONT + . The learngenes are obtained from either FRONT via the open available pre-trained models or FRONT + using source models refined with our frequency regularization. The core process involves transforming weight modules via DCT to extract task-agnostic knowledge. Finally, these learngenes are used to initialize diverse target models through the IDCT, which flexibly accommodate varying architectures via zero-padding or truncation.
W192 (DeiT-Ti)
W384 (DeiT-S)
W768 (DeiT-B)
L4
L6
L8
L10
L12
L4
L6
L8
L10
L12
L4
L6
L8
L10
L12
Methods
Epoch
Para.
2.2
3.1
4.0
4.9
5.8
Para.
7.9
11.5
15.0
18.6
22.2
Para.
29.9
44.1
58.3
72.5
86.7
Direct
He-Init
0
0
34.7
40.6
43.7
46.8
48.3
0
42.2
49.4
52.1
53.7
55.5
0
47.9
53.1
54.4
55.0
56.7
Mimetic
0
0
35.1
40.2
43.2
46.3
48.1
0
43.3
49.1
53.0
54.1
55.6
0
50.2
54.3
56.5
58.5
58.6
Wt Select
0
3.9
46.1
52.3
55
56.8
58.9
15.0
50.1
56
57.5
61.9
63.3
58.2
56.7
61.1
63.6
64.8
65.9
Heur-LG
0
1.7
41.5
47.4
50.5
53.5
55.5
6.1
52.3
57.3
61.7
64.4
65.9
22.8
60.5
68.7
72.2
73.6
74.0
Table 1: Performance of models initialized with different depths on ImageNet-1K for 10 epochs. Para.(M) denotes the number of parameters, specified per model size (rows) and as the average transferred during initialization (columns). “Epoch” indicates the extra training epochs for knowledge merging or pre-training. “ / ” denotes failed initialization, and “N/A” indicates that the metric is not applicable. The best result in each column is highlighted in bold, while the second-best is underlined.
L6
W384
W576
W768
W1152
W1536
Methods
Epoch
Para.
11.5
25.1
44.1
98.0
173.1
Direct
He-Init
0
0
49.4
51.5
53.1
46.6
31.3
Mimetic
0
0
49.1
48.0
54.3
47.7
33.0
Wt Select
0
26.8
48.6
50.7
55.4
/
/
LiGO
0
10.0
63.6
63.1
69.5
70.0
73.7
Table 2: Performance of initializing models with variable widths on ImageNet-1K.
DeiT-Ti, 3.0M
DeiT-S, 11.3M
Methods
Para.
Flow.
CUB
Cars
C 10
C 100
Food
iNat.
Aver.
Para.
Flow.
CUB
Cars
C 10
C 100
Food
iNat.
Aver.
Direct
He-Init
0
53.9
26.1
19.9
92.4
68.3
68.4
52.3
54.5
0
57.2
27.3
23.8
94.0
66.5
70.6
54.0
56.2
Mimetic
0
52.1
35.0
20.5
88.9
63.4
66.9
49.0
53.7
0
57.4
39.6
34.2
91.6
65.7
67.1
52.2
58.3
Wt Select
2.9
55.0
34.4
21.7
92.5
67.0
67.4
51.2
55.6
11.0
58.3
33.1
28.1
94.1
68.1
69.0
54.2
57.8
Heur-LG
1.5
64.7
44.6
37.7
94.0
71.1
74.7
57.4
63.5
5.7
69.1
48.0
51.2
95.1
72.8
76.8
59.3
67.5
Cluster-LG
2.4
62.8
44.8
36.9
94.1
74.5
78.6
56.4
64.0
5.1
65.5
45.4
46.3
95.4
74.6
78.4
60.4
66.6
Table 3: Performance of models on downstream datasets. “Para.(M)” is the average parameter transferred during model initialization.
Figure 3: Comparison of different direct initialization methods during full training on DeiT-Ti and DeiT-S.
Task
Scratch
KD
FRONT
SST-2
78.97
77.75
82.44 ( ↑ 3.47)
MNLI
63.65
64.81
74.08 ( ↑ 9.27)
MRPC
66.42
64.14
68.46 ( ↑ 2.04)
CoLA
8.14
9.14
17.38 ( ↑ 8.24)
QNLI
57.21
58.00
70.86 ( ↑ 13.65)
QQP
81.50
80.07
84.93 ( ↑ 4.86)
Table 4: GLUE benchmark results on BERT-S.
ResNet50
ResNet152
Rand.
FRONT
Rand.
FRONT
Image.
74.1
76.1
↑ 2.0
76.8
77.2
↑ 0.4
Flow.
51.3
91.3
↑ 40.0
28.0
87.7
↑ 59.7
CUB
40.7
68.9
↑ 28.2
22.8
68.2
↑ 45.4
Cars
48.6
88.2
↑ 39.6
29.3
87.4
↑ 58.1
C10
94.8
95.6
↑ 0.8
95.6
95.7
↑ 0.1
Table 5: Performance comparison on ResNet50 and ResNet152.
Figure 4: Results of pretraining BRET-S, RoBERTa-S and GPT-S. FRONT can achieve the highest savings in FLOPs with 47.5% for BERT-S, 42.9% for RoBERTa-S, and 31.0% for GPT-S from the Scratch models.
γd∖r
0.33
0.50
0.67
0.83
1.00
–
60.63
62.74
64.79
65.06
66.19
\nicefrac116
66.61
66.64
66.65
66.58
66.60
\nicefrac18
66.97
67.22
67.02
67.11
67.13
\nicefrac14
67.08
67.58
68.02
67.92
67.88
\nicefrac12
66.74
66.92
66.00
66.72
66.94
1
66.57
66.76
66.60
66.69
66.75
Table 6: Top-1 accuracy (%) on ImageNet-1K as a function of r and γd . And ‘–’ corresponds to a direct application of FRONT without refinement.
Wqkv
Wo
Wmlp
norm
SST-2
MNLI
MRPC
CoLA
QNLI
QQP
STS-B
Avg
78.97
63.65
66.42
8.14
57.21
81.50
17.27
53.31
✓
82.11
72.14
68.62
4.63
66.95
84.71
43.19
60.34
✓
82.34
66.70
68.87
10.23
62.57
81.81
42.79
59.33
✓
80.73
67.29
69.61
12.34
60.97
78.78
36.85
58.08
✓
80.85
65.69
67.40
14.35
61.76
81.50
42.65
59.17
✓
✓
81.19
72.17
70.34
16.42
69.98
84.82
50.35
63.61
Table 7: Performance comparison of varying module configurations on BERT-B to BERT-S across GLUE benchmarks. The transferable low-frequency knowledge in language models is primarily concentrated in the self-attention weights ( Wqkv and Wo ).
Wqkv
Wo
Wmlp
norm
Acc (%)
34.7
✓
46.5
✓
46.6
✓
54.8
✓
47.7
✓
✓
50.1
Table 8: Module-level ablation study on DeiT-Ti (L12 to L4) evaluated on ImageNet-1K. The results indicate that transferable low-frequency knowledge is predominantly concentrated in the MLP weights for vision models.
Figure 5: (a)Achieving superior performance with efficient refinement. (b) Self-attention layer structural patterns illustrated. The figure displays matrices WqWkT (top) and WvWo (bottom) across three DeiT-T configurations: random initialization, pre-trained, and FRONT-initialized models. FRONT can inherit the diagonal property of self-attention layers that only exists in pre-trained ViTs.
Appendix figures & tables10 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Training Settings
Configuration
optimizer
AdamW
base learning rate
Ti: 5e-4 ∣ S: 2.5e-4 ∣ B: 1.25e-4
warmup learning rate
1e-6
weight decay
0.05
optimizer momentum
0.9
batch size
Ti: 512 ∣ S: 256 ∣ B: 128
Appendix
Table 9: Hyper-parameters for FRONT’s Retraining on ImageNet-1K.
Dataset
Batch Size
Epochs DeiT/ResNet
Learning Rate
Drop Last
Warmup Epochs
Droppath Rate
Color Jitter
Auto Augment
Random Erase
Mixup
Cutmix
Scheduler
Optimizer
Oxford Flowers
512
300/100
3e-4
False
0
0
0.4
rand-m9-mstd0.5-inc1
0.25
0
0
cosine
AdamW
CUB-200-2011
512
300/100
3e-4
False
0
0.1
0
0.25
0
0
cosine
AdamW
Stanford Cars
512
300/100
3e-4
False
0
0.1
0
0.25
0
0
cosine
AdamW
CIFAR10
512
300/100
5e-4
True
0
0.1
0.4
0.25
0
0
cosine
AdamW
CIFAR100
512
300/100
5e-4
True
0
0.1
0.4
0.25
0
0
cosine
AdamW
Food101
512
300/100
5e-4
True
0
0.1
0.4
0.25
0
0
cosine
AdamW
Appendix
Table 10: Hyperparameters for neural networks trained on downstream datasets.
Dataset
Classes
Total
Training
Testing
Oxford Flowers ( Nilsback & Zisserman, 2008 )
102
8,189
2,040
6,149
CUB-200-2011 ( Wah et al., 2011 )
200
11,788
5,994
5,794
Stanford Cars ( Gebru et al., 2017 )
196
16,185
8,144
8,041
CIFAR10 ( Krizhevsky & Hinton, 2009 )
10
60,000
50,000
10,000
CIFAR100 ( Krizhevsky & Hinton, 2009 )
100
60,000
50,000
10,000
Food101 ( Bossard et al., 2014 )
101
101,000
75,750
25,250
Appendix
Table 11: Characteristics of downstream datasets.
Methods
Scratch
FRONT
DFT
DWT
PCA
SVD
DeiT-Ti_L12 → DeiT-Ti_L6
40.6
63.3
60.8
62.0
57.9
53.0
DeiT-S_L6 → DeiT-Ti_L6
40.6
56.9
47.9
55.4
50.2
43.6
Appendix
Table 12: Comparison of different basis transforms for knowledge transfer on ImageNet-1K. Our DCT-based method (FRONT) achieves the highest top-1 accuracy (%) in both depth and width transfer tasks. This validates our design choice.
Transferring pre-trained knowledge from a source model to a target model of a different architectural size is a key challenge for flexible and efficient model scaling. However, current parameter-space methods treat Small-to-Large (S2L) and Large-to-Small (L2S) scaling as separate, incompatible problems, focusing on parameter synthesis and selection, respectively. This fragmented perspective has resulted in specialized tools, hindering a unified, bidirectional framework. In this paper, we propose BoT (Bidirectional knowledge Transfer), the first size-agnostic framework to unify S2L and L2S scaling. Our core insight is to treat model weights as continuous signals, where models of different sizes represent distinct discretizations of the transferable knowledge. This multi-resolution perspective directly casts S2L and L2S scaling as the signal processing operations of upsampling and downsampling, naturally leading to the adoption of the Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) and its Inverse (IDWT). BoT leverages the recursive nature of wavelets, using the decomposition level as a dynamic scaling factor to bridge disparate model sizes in a parameter-free and computationally efficient manner. Extensive experiments on DeiT, BERT, and GPT demonstrate significant pre-training FLOPs savings (up to 67.1% for S2L, 52.8% for L2S) and state-of-the-art performance on benchmarks like GLUE and SQuAD.
Jianlu Shen, Fu Feng, Jiaze Xu +3
School of Computer Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China · Key Laboratory of New Generation Artificial Intelligence Technology and Its Interdisciplinary Applications (Southeast University), Ministry of Education, China
Finetuning pretrained models occurs in a low-dimensional subspace of the full parameter space. Prior work has focused on characterizing this optimization subspace, but largely ignored the complementary question: why do certain directions remain unexplored during finetuning? Are these stable directions irrelevant to downstream tasks, or do they already encode task-relevant structure that requires no further adjustment? Answering this question is central to understanding how pretrained knowledge transfers. Through systematic spectral analysis across vision and language models, we show that the leading singular vectors of pretrained weight matrices remain highly stable under finetuning and are shared across unrelated downstream tasks, revealing that pretraining establishes a reusable spectral coordinate system. Models pretrained on larger datasets exhibit greater spectral stability under distribution shift or task change, directly linking pretraining scale to geometric transferability. Motivated by these findings, we propose a parameter-efficient method that freezes pretrained singular vectors and optimizes only leading spectral coefficients, achieving competitive performance on GLUE with 0.2% trainable parameters. Our results reveal that the stable directions encode transferable structure rather than irrelevant noise: successful pretraining discovers spectral bases that downstream tasks inherit and operate within.
Junjie Yu, Yue Wang, Zihan Deng +3
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology · Department of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong
Model families are trained size by size. Can a pretrained large model instead be converted into a smaller sibling? We study the 1.4B->410M conversion in Pythia end to end. Representations align strongly across sizes (ridge R^2=0.84); parameters align weakly. Dense weight projection is destructive; a bit-exact control places the fault in basis mixing, which breaks rotary, per-head, GELU, and LayerNorm structure. Residuals after the best-fit linear operator carry no learnable or transferable signal under shuffle controls, so conversion value lives in initialization. Matched-budget continued pre-training separates two independent levers: least-squares compensation (function lever, best zero-shot) and variance-preserving rescale (dynamics lever, best endpoints). Placement follows the architecture: compensation is well-posed exactly where no normalization sits between cut and read; norm-fronted paths take rescale. Compensation is a low-budget, token-efficiency win, not a universal one. At 30M tokens it beats the best subcloning variant on a width-reduced pair (84.0+-1.8 vs. 89.7+-3.7, 3/3 seeds) and a held-out depth-reduced pair (109.3 vs. 117.9, 3/3 seeds). Selection given the same activation statistics recovers under half of that gap (3/3 seeds): the gain is the re-fit, not the information. At 33x the budget the two reach parity (40.3+-0.3 vs. 40.3+-0.5, 3 seeds), both far ahead of from-scratch, which transfer always beats (up to 18x at low budget, narrowing at convergence and at the largest scale). At ~5x the donor scale (6.9B->1.4B) stacking both levers over-corrects, consistent with an ill-conditioned compensation solve at large width, pointing to dimension-aware regularization as a fix. The init also beats structured pruning plus distillation, the standard pipeline, at matched budget, and improves further combined with it. Code, checkpoints, and the frozen eval corpus are released.