cs.LGMar 8, 2026

Step-Size Decay and Structural Stagnation in Greedy Sparse Learning

Authors: Pablo M. Berná

Organizations: Departamento de Matemáticas, CUNEF Universidad Madrid, Spain

Abstract

Greedy algorithms are central to sparse approximation and stage-wise learning methods such as matching pursuit and boosting. It is known that the Power-Relaxed Greedy Algorithm with step sizes m−αm^{-α} may fail to converge when α>1α>1 in general Hilbert spaces. In this work, we revisit this phenomenon from a sparse learning perspective. We study realizable regression problems with controlled feature coherence and derive explicit lower bounds on the residual norm, showing that over-decaying step-size schedules induce structural stagnation even in low-dimensional sparse settings. Numerical experiments confirm the theoretical predictions and illustrate the role of feature coherence. Our results provide insight into step-size design in greedy sparse learning.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

Feb 6, 2026

Optimal Learning Rate Schedules under Functional Scaling Laws: Power Decay and Warmup-Stable-Decay

We study optimal learning rate (LR) schedules under the functional scaling law (FSL) framework (Li et al., 2025), which decomposes training dynamics into signal learning and noise forgetting. In power-law kernel regression, these two components are governed by a source exponent s>0s>0 and a capacity exponent q>1q>1, respectively, with smaller ss corresponding to harder tasks. For a fixed training horizon NN, we characterize the schedules that minimize the final-step loss under a stability constraint and reveal a sharp phase transition. In the easy-task regime s>1−1/qs>1-1/q, the optimal schedule follows power decay from the beginning of training; in the hard-task regime s<1−1/qs<1-1/q, it becomes warmup-stable-decay (WSD)-like (Hu et al., 2024), staying at the largest admissible LR for most of training before a final decay. In both regimes, the decay exponent is 2q−12q-1: task difficulty determines when to decay, while model capacity determines how to decay. Beyond the exact optimum, we study fractional schedules, whose shape is defined over relative training progress. We show that precise tuning of the decay shape is often unnecessary: a broad class of profiles attains the optimal convergence rate, while overly slow terminal decay leads to schedule-induced capacity saturation. Finally, for one-pass SGD in kernel regression, FSL-motivated power-decay schedules achieve optimal last-iterate rates. Experiments support the theoretical predictions and the task-dependent transition between early and delayed decay.
Jun 6, 2024

On Regularization via Early Stopping for Least Squares Regression

A fundamental problem in machine learning is understanding the effect of early stopping on the parameters obtained and the generalization capabilities of the model. Even for linear models, the effect is not fully understood for arbitrary learning rates and data. In this paper, we analyze the dynamics of discrete full batch gradient descent for linear regression. With minimal distributional assumptions, we characterize the trajectory of the parameters and the expected excess risk. Using this characterization, we show that when training with any learning rate schedule and finite time horizon, the early stopped solution is equivalent to the minimum norm solution for a generalized ridge regression problem. We also prove that early stopping is beneficial for generic data with arbitrary spectrum and for a wide variety of learning rate schedules. We provide an estimate for the optimal stopping time and empirically demonstrate the accuracy of our estimate.
Oct 12, 2026

Asymptotic Risk of Learning-Rate Schedules for Least-Squares Regression with Discretely Distributed Features

We study the last iterate of stochastic gradient descent (SGD) on streaming least squares with discretely distributed features (Slock's model), which decouples the dynamics across eigendirections. Under power-law source and capacity conditions, we derive the exact finite-time risk and asymptotic equivalents of constant and Warmup-Stable-Decay (WSD) schedules. With a tuned base learning-rate, the resulting scaling law decays as Θ(T−q)Θ(T^{-q}), where TT is the horizon, and qq is independent of the cooldown length c∈(0,1]c \in (0,1] but is strictly smaller for the constant schedule: any cooldown of fixed relative length c>0c > 0, however short, improves the risk by a polynomial factor, while its length only affects the constant, which is minimized by linear decay (c=1c = 1). Finally, we show that the optimal risk depends on the batch size bb and horizon TT only through bTbT, up to a critical batch size.