CONTACT: CONtact-aware TACTile Learning for Robotic Disassembly
Organizations: the Department of Industrial Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA · the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
Abstract
Robotic disassembly involves contact-rich interactions in which successful manipulation depends not only on geometric alignment but also on force-dependent state transitions. While vision-based policies perform well in structured settings, their reliability often degrades in tight-tolerance, contact-dominated, or deformable scenarios. In this work, we systematically investigate the role of tactile sensing in robotic disassembly through both simulation and real-world experiments. We construct five rigid-body disassembly tasks in simulation with increasing geometric constraints and extraction difficulty. We further design five real-world tasks, including three rigid and two deformable scenarios, to evaluate contact-dependent manipulation. Within a unified learning framework, we compare three sensing configurations: Vision Only, Vision + tactile RGB (TacRGB), and Vision + tactile force field (TacFF). Across both simulation and real-world experiments, TacFF-based policies consistently achieve the highest success rates, with particularly notable gains in contact-dependent and deformable settings. Notably, naive fusion of TacRGB and TacFF underperforms either modality alone, indicating that simple concatenation can dilute task-relevant force information. Our results show that tactile sensing plays a critical, task-dependent role in robotic disassembly, with structured force-field representations being particularly effective in contact-dominated scenarios.
Figures & tables
| Task S1 | Task S2 | Task S3 | Task S4 | Task S5 | |
| Modality | Vertical Pull, | Vertical Pull, | Loose Plug | Vertical Pull, | Vertical Pull |
| Loose Socket | Tight Socket | with Lid | Flat Barb | Spike Barb | |
| Vision Only | 81.7% | 36.9% | 50.0% | 74.6% | 59.5% |
| Vision + TacRGB | 84.4% | 37.2% | 51.4% | 75.1% | 57.8% |
| Vision + TacFF | 86.5% | 44.3% | 53.5% | 78.8% | 61.9% |
| Task R1 | Task R2 | Task R3 | Task R4 | Task R5 | |
| Modality | Vertical Pull, | Vertical Pull, | Loose Plug | Vertical | Vertical |
| Loose Socket | Tight Socket | with Lid | Push Tab | Clip | |
| Vision Only | 80.0% | 55.0% | 40.0% | 70.0% | 15.0% |
| Vision + TacRGB | 90.0% | 30.0% | 15.0% | 5.0% | 45.0% |
| Vision + TacFF | 95.0% | 70.0% | 45.0% | 75.0% | 55.0% |
| Task R1 | Task R2 | Task R3 | Task R4 | Task R5 | |
| Modality | Vertical Pull, | Vertical Pull, | Loose Plug | Vertical | Vertical |
| Loose Socket | Tight Socket | with Lid | Push Tab | Clip | |
| Vision Only | 21.1 s | 25.4 s | 51.4 s | 19.9 s | 28.3 s |
| Vision + TacRGB | 22.4 s | 30.2 s | 28.0 s | 19.0 s | 35.9 s |
| Vision + TacFF | 22.8 s | 22.5 s | 67.6 s | 18.3 s | 58.0 s |
| Task R1 | Task R5 | |||
| Modality | Vertical Pull, | Vertical Clip | ||
| loose socket | ||||
| Lighting | Normal | Dim | Normal | Dim |
| Vision Only | 80.0% | 25.0% | 15.0% | 0.0% |
| Vision + TacRGB | 90.0% | 10.0% | 45.0% | 40.0% |
| Vision + TacFF | 95.0% | 25.0% | 55.0% | 55.0% |
| Task R3 | Task R5 | |
| Modality | Loose Plug with Lid | Vertical Clip |
| Vision Only | 40.0% | 15.0% |
| Vision + TacRGB | 15.0% | 45.0% |
| Vision + TacFF | 45.0% | 55.0% |
| Vision + TacRGB + TacFF | 0.0% | 20.0% |
Robotic Manipulation
Robotic manipulation studies how robots perceive, plan, and control physical interactions to grasp, move, assemble, and use objects.
See all 1,671 papers