Sensitivity-Guided Framework for Pruned and Quantized Reservoir Computing Accelerators

PQuantML is a new open-source, hardware-aware neural network model compression library tailored to end-to-end workflows. Motivated by the need to deploy performant models to environments with strict latency constraints, PQuantML simplifies training of compressed models by providing a unified interface to apply pruning and quantization, either jointly or individually. The library implements multiple pruning methods with different granularities, as well as fixed-point quantization with support for High-Granularity Quantization. We evaluate PQuantML on representative tasks such as the jet substructure classification, so-called jet tagging, an on-edge problem related to real-time LHC data processing. Using various pruning methods with fixed-point quantization, PQuantML achieves substantial parameter and bit-width reductions while maintaining accuracy. The resulting compression is further compared against existing tools, such as QKeras and HGQ.

Short-term load forecasting is essential for reliable energy management, but practical deployment on edge devices requires models that remain accurate under limited memory, finite measurement budgets, and hardware noise. This work proposes a hardware-efficient Quantum Reservoir Computing (QRC) framework for energy load forecasting, where a fixed quantum reservoir transforms temporal input windows into high-dimensional features and only a classical Elastic Net readout is trained. To reduce deployment cost, the trained readout is compressed using post-training fixed-point quantization at bit widths from 8 to 2 bits. The framework is evaluated on the Tetouan and Spain energy load datasets under exact statevector simulation, 512-shot finite sampling, and realistic hardware-noise models from IBM FakeTorino and IBM FakeMarrakesh. Results show that 6-bit readout precision preserves full-precision forecasting performance while reducing readout memory by 81.2%. Below this point, degradation becomes dataset dependent, with Tetouan showing stronger sensitivity and Spain degrading more gradually. Hardware-noise validation further shows that the trained readout transfers to noisy reservoir states without retraining. These findings support quantized QRC as a resource-aware forecasting approach for near-term quantum time-series applications.

Modern deep neural networks achieve strong performance, but their scale makes them costly and slow, especially on resource-constrained edge devices. Pruning and quantization address this, but rely on manual, expert choices and on algorithms that are hard to apply across architectures. Uniform settings also ignore how differently individual layers respond to compression, which costs accuracy. We introduce APQF, an agentic profiling-guided framework that combines structured pruning, mixed-precision quantization-aware training, and accuracy recovery in one automated pipeline. A profiling agent measures how cost is distributed across the model and how sensitive each part is to pruning, and this evidence drives per-layer pruning ratios, per-layer bit-widths, and the recovery strategy, all proposed by LLM planners and validated before execution. To our knowledge, APQF is the first framework to combine LLM-guided, profiling-grounded decisions with a fully training-aware pruning and quantization pipeline for both CNNs and vision transformers. We evaluate APQF on ResNet, VGG7, ViT, DeiT, and Swin using ImageNet-1k and CIFAR-10. On ImageNet it cuts compute to 5.6-7.7 percent of the original bit-operations, a 13-18x reduction, while keeping accuracy close to the baseline, and under a 200K-image budget it stays roughly 17 points higher in Top-1 than existing joint pruning and quantization methods. On CIFAR-10 it compresses further than that method on four of five architectures. On VGG7 it reaches 93.15 percent using only 0.41 percent of baseline bit-operations, the only method at that compression level to improve on its full-precision baseline. Ablations show that uniform compression loses the most accuracy at matched compute, and that withholding profiling data from the planner hurts every model. Six LLM planners, including free open-weight ones, all reach 97.4-97.9 percent on Swin-Tiny.