You Didn't Have to Say It like That: Subliminal Learning from Faithful Paraphrases

Subliminal learning is a phenomenon where language models can transmit behavioral traits to other models through seemingly innocuous data (Cloud et al., 2025). In subliminal learning, a teacher model with a behavioral trait (e.g. obsession with cats) can transmit this cat obsession to a student model finetuned only on numerical sequences generated by the teacher. In this paper, we ask: how does this unexpected behavioral transmission occur? We show that subliminal learning is a LoRA artifact. When subliminal learning occurs, transmission has an inverted U-shaped relationship with LoRA rank; it also disappears with full finetuning. We show that subliminal learning is highly dependent on the context seen during finetuning and evaluation. For example, a Qwen model with the default system prompt during finetuning ("You are Qwen, created by Alibaba Cloud. You are a helpful assistant.") does not show subliminal learning during generation when no system prompt is included. We further demonstrate that subliminal behavior is localized to computation at tokens seen during both finetuning and evaluation (e.g. the model's default system prompt, the standard chat template tokens, etc.). Overall, subliminal learning seems to be a fragile artifact of LoRA hyperparameters and finetuning context, making it an unstable channel for behavioral transmission.

Knowledge distillation can transmit unintended behavioral traits from a teacher model to a student through training data that appear semantically unrelated to those traits, a phenomenon known as subliminal learning. Although recent work has established this effect, its training dynamics and mitigation remain underexplored. We study subliminal learning in open-weight language models ranging from 1.5B to 8B parameters, covering the Qwen, Gemma, and Llama families in number-sequence and chain-of-thought settings. Rather than evaluating only final models, we track trait-related probabilities throughout fine-tuning and find that subliminal acquisition can be highly non-monotonic, with transient spikes, reversals, and trait-specific failures of transfer. We then introduce liminal training, an annealed KL-regularized fine-tuning method that constrains early drift from the base model. Across our experiments, liminal training substantially reduces subliminal trait acquisition while largely preserving task gains, outperforming paraphrasing and layer freezing as mitigation strategies. The effect also extends beyond animal preferences: in a French-language response-style experiment, liminal training suppresses language transfer while retaining much of the GSM8K improvement. Finally, we show that KL timing matters: early regularization is more effective than late regularization, and sweeping the regularization strength reveals an empirical trade-off between task learning and trait suppression.

Language models are increasingly trained on the outputs of other models, forming chains that we call lineages, in which a trait present in one generation can pass to the next. Prior work on subliminal learning has shown that a teacher's trait can transmit to a student through filtered data carrying none of the trait's content. However, the evidence covers only a single training step. We study whether such a trait holds or fades across lineages. We instill the trait into three copies of Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct and iterate the training step to depth ten from each, reading every generation two ways on the same held-out prompts: a keyword screen that looks for expressions of the trait in the model's output, and an activation probe that projects each model's displacement from the base onto a direction built from the other lineages' teachers. We report two findings. First, the trait persists through ten generations across three lineages. The instilled models express it on every completion; the keyword-screen rate falls to 55.6% after the first step and to 21.1% by generation ten. The base itself matches the screen on none of its 300 completions. Second, the trait can be present internally while absent behaviorally. When the model's default system prompt is removed at evaluation, the generation-ten students' keyword-screen rate is zero on every prompt while the probe score stays positive on every prompt. Steering the untreated base with the displacement of a generation-ten student, which is trained and measured under the default system prompt, induces screened expression of the trait even with the system prompt removed, while that same student shows no expression of the trait with the system prompt removed.