Addressing the challenges of fragmented task definitions and the heterogeneity of unstructured data in multimodal parsing, this paper proposes the Omni Parsing framework. This framework establishes a Unified Taxonomy covering documents, images, and audio-visual streams, introducing a progressive parsing paradigm that bridges perception and cognition. Specifically, the framework integrates three hierarchical levels: 1) Holistic Detection, which achieves precise spatial-temporal grounding of objects or events to establish a geometric baseline for perception; 2) Fine-grained Recognition, which performs symbolization (e.g., OCR/ASR) and attribute extraction on localized objects to complete structured entity parsing; and 3) Multi-level Interpreting, which constructs a reasoning chain from local semantics to global logic. A pivotal advantage of this framework is its evidence anchoring mechanism, which enforces a strict alignment between high-level semantic descriptions and low-level facts. This enables ``evidence-based'' logical induction, transforming unstructured signals into standardized knowledge that is locatable, enumerable, and traceable. Building on this foundation, we constructed a standardized dataset and released the Logics-Parsing-Omni model, which successfully converts complex audio-visual signals into machine-readable structured knowledge. Experiments demonstrate that fine-grained perception and high-level cognition are synergistic, effectively enhancing model reliability. Furthermore, to quantitatively evaluate these capabilities, we introduce OmniParsingBench. Code, models and the benchmark are released at https://github.com/alibaba/Logics-Parsing/tree/master/Logics-Parsing-Omni.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: OmniParsingBench performance of Logics-Parsing-Omni.
Figure 2: Showcase of the multifaceted capabilities of Logics-Parsing-Omni.
Figure 3: The construction of unified multi-modal parsing corpus and training pipeline of our proposed Logics-Parsing-Omni.
Figure 4: Overview of the Omni Parsing Framework. The framework transforms multimodal raw data into unified structured training data via three progressive stages: (1) L1-Holistic Detection: Performs spatio-temporal grounding and coarse classification; (2) L2-Fine-grained Recognition: Extracts detailed text, symbols, knowledge, attributes, and speech content; (3) L3-Multi-level Interpreting: Synthesizes local semantics with global logical reasoning. The final output is a standardized JSON format containing all parsing results from L1 to L3.
Domain
Data Category
Task
# Samples
Document
General Document
Parsing (Structure)
342K
Parsing (Structure&Semantic)
333K
Image
Natural Image
Caption (Single-Image)
360K
Parsing (Single-Image)
411K
Caption (Diff, Multi-Image)
354K
Parsing (Diff, Multi-Image)
212K
Table 1: Detailed statistics of the constructed corpus.
Model
Natural Image
Graphics
Document
Audio
Natural Video
Text-Rich Video
Ovr.
Perc.
Cog.
Ovr.
Perc.
Cog.
Perc.
Ovr.
Perc.
Cog.
Ovr.
Perc.
Cog.
Ovr.
Perc.
Cog.
Gemini-3-Pro
61.20
55.96
66.44
87.03
84.21
87.43
87.01
79.40
72.90
85.89
63.40
57.87
68.92
64.37
58.54
70.20
GPT-5.2
39.94
37.77
42.12
82.71
69.86
91.48
77.43
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
57.40
56.95
57.85
82.81
73.77
83.13
81.09
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
58.61
56.23
60.99
79.49
71.51
83.46
84.47
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B
50.92
48.91
52.94
73.25
65.71
79.36
78.94
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Table 2: Performance comparison of various models on OmniParsingBench.
Table 10: Comparisons with State-of-the-art methods on OmniDocBench-v1.5.
Model
Perception
Cognition
Precision ( ↑ )
Recall ( ↑ )
Precision ( ↑ )
Irre. ( ↓ )
Recall ( ↑ )
Gemini-3-Pro
0.417
0.349
0.573
0.331
0.460
GPT-5.2
0.123
0.169
0.671
0.414
0.490
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
0.383
0.328
0.621
0.376
0.461
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
0.356
0.293
0.653
0.339
0.518
Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B
0.242
0.315
0.496
0.402
0.365
Table 11: Evaluation results on the Natural-Image Difference Module of OmniParsingBench
Figure 7: Qualitative examples illustrating the natural image difference parsing capability of Logics-Parsing-Omni.
Model
Overall
Perception
Cognition
Diff Detection
Diff Identification
Accuracy
Plausibility
Positioning
Existence
Relation
Object
Operation
Logic
Halluc.
Coord.
Radius
Point
Line/Arc
Circle
Geo.
Quant.
Gemini-3-Pro
27.35
26.45
0.00
32.23
1.05
1.59
4.71
2.71
37.16
33.92
34.74
37.42
GPT-5.2
36.43
7.46
0.47
58.55
9.02
18.98
6.18
5.76
50.16
43.74
46.98
47.94
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
33.68
11.92
0.87
44.54
2.60
6.54
6.34
4.94
46.84
43.22
44.62
45.88
Table 12: Evaluation results on the Geo-Image Difference Module of OmniParsingBench.
Figure 8: Qualitative examples illustrating the graphic image difference parsing capability of Logics-Parsing-Omni.
Model
Overall
Chart
Geometry
OCR & Data
Visual Elements
Logical Reasoning
Avg.
Basic Elements
Geometric Relations
Quantitative Relations
Avg.
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B
79.55
82.33
86.51
73.97
81.40
80.16
71.67
80.41
77.70
+ Graphics (Caption Only)
79.70
81.80
87.91
68.04
80.10
84.10
70.65
75.26
79.30
+ Graphics (Parsing & Caption)
91.80
97.17
95.81
90.87
95.50
90.16
82.94
90.72
88.10
Table 13: Ablation results on the Graphics Cognition.
Appendix figures & tables14 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Model
Entity
Knowledge-Aware Entity
Text
Average
Loc. Recall
Sem. Acc. ∗
Score
Loc. Recall
Sem. Acc. ∗
Score
Loc. Recall
OCR Acc. ∗
Lang. Acc. ∗
Score
Gemini 3 Pro
75.90
97.35
73.89
88.01
59.44
52.32
59.09
74.49
88.46
41.67
55.96
GPT 5.2 †
58.30
93.08
54.26
-
-
-
47.52
49.25
86.57
21.28
37.77
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
73.54
97.60
71.77
89.30
51.80
46.26
83.10
74.58
84.70
52.82
56.95
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct
68.56
97.41
66.79
89.30
58.68
52.41
76.11
69.30
85.96
49.50
56.23
Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
63.08
97.65
61.60
83.15
44.77
37.23
88.03
64.80
83.20
47.89
48.91
Appendix
Table 14: Detailed Evaluation Results on the Natural Image module of OmniParsingBench - Perception
Model
Overall Metrics
Caption Length
Detailed Evaluation Metrics
Overall
Answerable
Precision
Theme
Emotion
Scene
Count
Attribute
Location
Text
Style
Composition
Direct Dense Caption
Gemini 3 Pro
86.38
93.40
92.48
1,613
95.43
86.27
87.54
80.55
90.06
83.87
90.16
84.72
77.55
GPT 5.2
73.52
81.83
89.86
1,726
89.12
49.02
79.44
63.64
75.22
73.94
59.39
78.12
68.54
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
82.48
90.32
91.33
1,060
95.23
88.24
86.20
71.50
86.72
80.07
79.19
80.06
74.10
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct
79.86
88.75
89.98
1,234
94.40
89.22
86.76
68.47
82.94
75.44
80.71
78.67
69.82
Appendix
Table 15: Detailed Evaluation Results on the Natural Image module of OmniParsingBench - Cognition.
Model
Overall
Perception
Cognition
Stat. Charts (F1)
Struct. Diagrams (Sim.)
Avg.
OCR & Data
Visual Elements
Logical Reasoning
Avg. Acc.
Gemini-3-Pro 13 13 footnotemark: 13
88.00
87.43
89.60
87.80
89.22
90.70
83.11
88.20
GPT-5.2 9 9 footnotemark: 9
88.28
79.63
87.49
83.56
94.88
87.21
93.95
93.00
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B 16 16 footnotemark: 16
87.41
92.28
90.12
91.91
83.57
90.23
73.97
82.90
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B Bai et al. (2025a)
86.05
84.51
81.46
83.99
89.22
91.63
81.74
88.10
Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B Bai et al. (2025a)
75.90
63.22
87.76
67.40
86.75
88.37
74.43
84.40
Appendix
Table 16: Detailed Evaluation Results on the Graphics Module of OmniParsingBench - Chart.
Model
Overall
Perception
Cognition
Positioning
Existence
Relation
Avg.
Basic Elements
Geometric Relations
Quantitative Relations
Avg.
Coord.
Radius
Point
Line/Arc
Circle
Geo.
Quant.
Gemini-3-Pro 13 13 footnotemark: 13
86.05
72.53
85.20
92.63
69.04
96.97
77.88
90.02
83.10
89.51
87.03
91.75
89.00
GPT-5.2 9 9 footnotemark: 9
77.13
5.26
85.98
89.63
62.93
97.33
58.45
75.49
65.46
91.48
81.91
92.78
88.80
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B 16 16 footnotemark: 16
78.21
7.30
85.66
88.87
61.17
96.40
68.95
80.15
68.41
88.85
84.64
92.78
88.00
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B Bai et al. (2025a)
72.92
16.75
88.37
89.89
62.91
96.80
50.77
81.79
67.24
82.13
67.58
89.69
78.60
Appendix
Table 17: Detailed evaluation results on the Graphics Module of OmniParsingBench - Geometrics.
Model
Overall
Perception
Cognition
Joint Acc.
L1 Acc.
L2 Acc.
Acc.
Gemini-3-Pro
38.37
34.81
65.19
34.81
41.92
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B
42.50
34.62
63.08
36.54
50.38
Logics-Parsing-Omni
67.12
65.58
88.65
65.58
68.65
Appendix
Table 18: Detailed evaluation results on the Natural Videos Module of OmniParsingBench - Camera.
Figure 9: Qualitative examples illustrating the natural image parsing capability of Logics-Parsing-Omni.
Figure 10: Qualitative examples illustrating the graphics image parsing capability of Logics-Parsing-Omni.
Figure 11: Qualitative examples illustrating the graphics image difference parsing capability of Logics-Parsing-Omni.
Figure 12: Qualitative examples illustrating the natural image difference parsing capability of Logics-Parsing-Omni.
Figure 13: Qualitative examples illustrating the natural video parsing capability of Logics-Parsing-Omni.
Figure 14: Qualitative example illustrating the comprehensive text-rich video parsing capability of Logics-Parsing-Omni.
Figure 15: Qualitative examples illustrating the text-rich video in-depth caption capability of Logics-Parsing-Omni.
Figure 16: Qualitative example illustrating the comprehensive document structure and semantic parsing capability of Logics-Parsing-Omni on the geometric illustration.
Figure 17: Qualitative example illustrating the comprehensive document structure and semantic parsing capability of Logics-Parsing-Omni on the graphics and natrual illustrations.
Document parsing has recently advanced with multimodal large language models (MLLMs) that directly map document images to structured outputs. Traditional cascaded pipelines depend on precise layout analysis and often fail under casually captured or non-standard conditions. Although end-to-end approaches mitigate this dependency, they still exhibit repetitive, hallucinated, and structurally inconsistent predictions - primarily due to the scarcity of large-scale, high-quality full-page (document-level) end-to-end parsing data and the lack of structure-aware training strategies. To address these challenges, we propose a data-training co-design framework for robust end-to-end document parsing. A Realistic Scene Synthesis strategy constructs large-scale, structurally diverse full-page end-to-end supervision by composing layout templates with rich document elements, while a Document-Aware Training Recipe introduces progressive learning and structure-token optimization to enhance structural fidelity and decoding stability. We further build Wild-OmniDocBench, a benchmark derived from real-world captured documents for robustness evaluation. Integrated into a 1B-parameter MLLM, our method achieves superior accuracy and robustness across both scanned/digital and real-world captured scenarios. All models, data synthesis pipelines, and benchmarks will be publicly released to advance future research in document understanding.
Gengluo Li, Pengyuan Lyu, Chengquan Zhang +7
Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences · University of Chinese Academy of Sciences · Tencent +2
General scene perception has progressed from object recognition toward open-vocabulary grounding, part localization, and affordance prediction. Yet these capabilities are often realized as isolated predictions that localize objects, parts, or interaction points without capturing the structured dependencies needed for interaction-oriented scene understanding. To address this gap, we introduce Hierarchical Scene Parsing, an interaction-oriented parsing task that represents physical scenes as explicit scene -> object -> part -> affordance hierarchies with cross-level bindings. We instantiate this task with SceneParser, a VLM-based parser trained for unified hierarchical generation with structural-completion pseudo labels and curriculum learning. To support training and evaluation, we construct SceneParser-Bench, a large-scale benchmark built with a scalable hierarchical data engine, containing 110K training images, a 5K validation split, 777K objects, 1.14M parts, 1.74M affordance annotations, and 1.74M valid object-part-affordance chain instances. We further introduce Level-1 to Level-3 conditional metrics and ParseRate to evaluate localization, cross-level binding, and hierarchical completeness. Experiments show that existing MLLMs and perception-stitching pipelines struggle with hierarchical parsing on our SceneParser-Bench, while SceneParser achieves stronger structure-aware performance. Besides, ablations, evaluations on COCO and AGD20K, and a downstream planning probe demonstrate that our SceneParser is compatible with conventional tasks and provides an actionable representation for visual understanding.
Pengxin Xu, Xincheng Lin, Luping Xiao +5
Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen · Zhongguancun Academy · Huazhong University of Science and Technology +4
We present Multimodal OCR (MOCR), a document parsing paradigm that jointly parses text and graphics into unified textual representations. Unlike conventional OCR systems that focus on text recognition and leave graphical regions as cropped pixels, our method, termed dots.mocr, treats visual elements such as charts, diagrams, tables, and icons as first-class parsing targets, enabling systems to parse documents while preserving semantic relationships across elements. It offers several advantages: (1) it reconstructs both text and graphics as structured outputs, enabling more faithful document reconstruction; (2) it supports end-to-end training over heterogeneous document elements, allowing models to exploit semantic relations between textual and visual components; and (3) it converts previously discarded graphics into reusable code-level supervision, unlocking multimodal supervision embedded in existing documents. To make this paradigm practical at scale, we build a comprehensive data engine from PDFs, rendered webpages, and native SVG assets, and train a compact 3B-parameter model through staged pretraining and supervised fine-tuning. We evaluate dots.mocr from two perspectives: document parsing and structured graphics parsing. On document parsing benchmarks, it ranks second only to Gemini 3 Pro on our OCR Arena Elo leaderboard, surpasses existing open-source document parsing systems, and sets a new state of the art of 83.9 on olmOCR Bench. On structured graphics parsing, our model achieves higher reconstruction quality than Gemini 3 Pro across image-to-SVG benchmarks, demonstrating strong performance on charts, UI layouts, scientific figures, and chemical diagrams. These results show a scalable path toward building large-scale image-to-code corpora for multimodal pretraining. Code and models are publicly available at https://github.com/rednote-hilab/dots.mocr.
Handong Zheng, Yumeng Li, Kaile Zhang +22
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · hi lab, Xiaohongshu Inc